foo_infobox, a substitute for buildin file info box |
![]() ![]() |
foo_infobox, a substitute for buildin file info box |
Dec 5 2003, 02:09
Post
#76
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 86 Joined: 21-October 03 Member No.: 9406 |
QUOTE (atici @ Dec 4 2003, 07:40 AM) Is it possible that I could now erase the original "Show File Info". Is there a .dll corresponding to it, so that when I delete it it'll be gone? Edit: Aha I did it through the Prefs You can move it to the right box in "Context menu items" ,and move the (Specail) to top:D |
|
|
|
Dec 8 2003, 17:36
Post
#77
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 109 Joined: 25-March 03 Member No.: 5661 |
v1.3.3
Added copy command button.It is independent of title formatting string,and has its own formatting string in config page. download link:foo_infobox.dll mirror:foo_infobox.zip edit: added a mirror download link This post has been edited by /\/irana: Dec 9 2003, 15:32 |
|
|
|
Dec 10 2003, 04:29
Post
#78
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 193 Joined: 22-December 02 Member No.: 4193 |
I love this plug-in!
BTW, the dll from the main download link fails to load, giving a bad Windows image error. The zipped & mirrored dll loads fine. -------------------- That's so plausible, I can't believe it.
|
|
|
|
Dec 10 2003, 04:39
Post
#79
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 489 Joined: 13-June 02 Member No.: 2290 |
Ah, thank you.
This really should be considered as a candidate for being the default infobox in Foobar. |
|
|
|
Dec 10 2003, 10:24
Post
#80
|
|
![]() Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 345 Joined: 26-February 03 From: Norwich, UK Member No.: 5189 |
QUOTE (DustMagnet @ Dec 10 2003, 04:29 AM) BTW, the dll from the main download link fails to load, giving a bad Windows image error. The zipped & mirrored dll loads fine. No problems for me downloading from the either of the download links. |
|
|
|
Dec 11 2003, 03:38
Post
#81
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 193 Joined: 22-December 02 Member No.: 4193 |
QUOTE (phwip @ Dec 10 2003, 01:24 AM) QUOTE (DustMagnet @ Dec 10 2003, 04:29 AM) BTW, the dll from the main download link fails to load, giving a bad Windows image error. The zipped & mirrored dll loads fine. No problems for me downloading from the either of the download links. Sorry, I was unclear. It downloads okay. But when I copy the dll over to the components folder and start Foobar, I get a "foobar_inbox.dll is not a valid Windows image" system error, and it doesn't load in Foobar. I just tried it again and get the same error. The zipped dll does work for me. -------------------- That's so plausible, I can't believe it.
|
|
|
|
Dec 11 2003, 09:34
Post
#82
|
|
![]() Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 345 Joined: 26-February 03 From: Norwich, UK Member No.: 5189 |
I did understand what you meant first time, just didn't explain properly in my response. For me, both downloads work fine AND when either downloaded file is copied into my components folder foobar2000 starts successfully and the infobox displays correctly.
So the actual file must be OK, but getting corrupted on download for you. Unless there is something about the file that fails on your OS or with your version of fb2k but works correctly on mine (Windows 2000 Server, fb2k 0.75 beta 1) |
|
|
|
Dec 11 2003, 11:42
Post
#83
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 109 Joined: 25-March 03 Member No.: 5661 |
QUOTE (DustMagnet @ Dec 10 2003, 06:38 PM) QUOTE (phwip @ Dec 10 2003, 01:24 AM) QUOTE (DustMagnet @ Dec 10 2003, 04:29 AM) BTW, the dll from the main download link fails to load, giving a bad Windows image error. The zipped & mirrored dll loads fine. No problems for me downloading from the either of the download links. Sorry, I was unclear. It downloads okay. But when I copy the dll over to the components folder and start Foobar, I get a "foobar_inbox.dll is not a valid Windows image" system error, and it doesn't load in Foobar. I just tried it again and get the same error. The zipped dll does work for me. Thanks for reporting It seem the dll link doesn't work for somebody.This had been reported before(here) I don't know why. The zip link works for you at least.It is lukey |
|
|
|
Dec 11 2003, 18:19
Post
#84
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 319 Joined: 9-October 03 Member No.: 9218 |
There seems to be a bug in 1.3.3. You can no longer double-click a field in the 'Other meta fields' section to edit it. Don't know if this was intentional or not. Thanks.
-------------------- f to c to f to c
|
|
|
|
Dec 12 2003, 11:13
Post
#85
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 109 Joined: 25-March 03 Member No.: 5661 |
QUOTE (Silverbolt @ Dec 11 2003, 09:19 AM) There seems to be a bug in 1.3.3. You can no longer double-click a field in the 'Other meta fields' section to edit it. Don't know if this was intentional or not. Thanks. Thanks fixed in 1.3.3b 1.3.3b download link:foo_infobox.dll I'll update zip mirror link to new version later. |
|
|
|
Dec 12 2003, 13:49
Post
#86
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 109 Joined: 25-March 03 Member No.: 5661 |
updated dll download link to v1.3.3c
Now you can press "enter" to open details info dialog in other meta fields list box Edit: updated zip mirror link to v1.3.3c This post has been edited by /\/irana: Dec 12 2003, 15:38 |
|
|
|
Dec 12 2003, 16:36
Post
#87
|
|
![]() Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 1180 Joined: 21-February 02 From: Chicago Member No.: 1367 |
Sorry. Latest link seems to be dead.
-------------------- The object of mankind lies in its highest individuals.
One must have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star. |
|
|
|
Dec 12 2003, 16:41
Post
#88
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 599 Joined: 9-October 03 From: ZZ 9 Plural Z Alpha Member No.: 9230 |
QUOTE (atici @ Dec 12 2003, 05:36 PM) Sorry. Latest link seems to be dead. No, it ain't - for me -------------------- Life is Real...
(But not in audio :) ) |
|
|
|
Dec 18 2003, 01:25
Post
#89
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 319 Joined: 9-October 03 Member No.: 9218 |
Found a very small bug (nitpicking really). Standard meta fields (Title, Artist, Album, etc.) have their field names saved in lowercase instead of uppercase. For example, if you view the tags in the default infobox, you'll see the Title field as "title" instead of "TITLE" (you'll need to double-click the field). This should be quite easy to fix (in fact, can even be done w/ a hex editor).
Also, how hard would it be to sort the technical info as well as the metadata fields? (Not really neccessary, I know, but just curious.) Thanks! :] -------------------- f to c to f to c
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2003, 02:10
Post
#90
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 31 Joined: 15-December 03 Member No.: 10457 |
awesome plugin. thanks!
haven't found any problems no really |
|
|
|
Dec 18 2003, 18:09
Post
#91
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 109 Joined: 25-March 03 Member No.: 5661 |
QUOTE (Silverbolt @ Dec 17 2003, 04:25 PM) Found a very small bug (nitpicking really). Standard meta fields (Title, Artist, Album, etc.) have their field names saved in lowercase instead of uppercase. For example, if you view the tags in the default infobox, you'll see the Title field as "title" instead of "TITLE" (you'll need to double-click the field). This should be quite easy to fix (in fact, can even be done w/ a hex editor). Also, how hard would it be to sort the technical info as well as the metadata fields? (Not really neccessary, I know, but just curious.) Thanks! :] ok,v1.3.4 uploaded -fixed bug of standard fields name saved in lowercase -added sort technical info option You can download it from new dynmic 3rd party foobar2000 components direct download link:foo_infobox.zip |
|
|
|
Dec 20 2003, 00:35
Post
#92
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 244 Joined: 1-September 03 Member No.: 8630 |
/\/irana:
are there any plans to make infobox support multiple items selected? if it did this, i could remove the standard foobar file info from my context menu it could be done the same way the standard one does it -- fields with the same info would show the data, fields with different info would say (info varies) or whatever. |
|
|
|
Dec 20 2003, 01:01
Post
#93
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 319 Joined: 9-October 03 Member No.: 9218 |
aron: it already does :]
select the multiple items > right-click > Show file info (special) > Multi-edit Multi-edit is to the left of the Update and Close buttons -------------------- f to c to f to c
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2003, 04:09
Post
#94
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 27 Joined: 11-July 02 From: Magrathea Member No.: 2554 |
I think aron means that he want's it to automatically take you to the multi-edit dialog when you select multiple files. That's something I'd like to see too.
-------------------- RedawgTS
King of all the little people with really big swords. |
|
|
|
Dec 20 2003, 08:29
Post
#95
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 109 Joined: 25-March 03 Member No.: 5661 |
QUOTE (RedawgTS @ Dec 19 2003, 07:09 PM) I think aron means that he want's it to automatically take you to the multi-edit dialog when you select multiple files. That's something I'd like to see too. Hm..Try v1.3.5 Added a "multiple edit" context menu item when you select multiple files |
|
|
|
Dec 20 2003, 11:04
Post
#96
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 244 Joined: 1-September 03 Member No.: 8630 |
QUOTE (RedawgTS @ Dec 19 2003, 07:09 PM) I think aron means that he want's it to automatically take you to the multi-edit dialog when you select multiple files. That's something I'd like to see too. im thinking that it would make a lot more sense and be a lot easier to use if there was only one context menu entry, like foobar default, that simply changed when multiple items were selected. like this: http://shovelbeating.org/~nirvana/newbox.jpg what do you think? (i think this would be great/perfect) (hope i didnt leave anything out in that image.) edit: also, notice how instead of just 'technical info' it says 'common technical info,' as well as the changed titlebar. This post has been edited by aron: Dec 20 2003, 11:05 |
|
|
|
Dec 20 2003, 11:52
Post
#97
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 84 Joined: 19-June 03 Member No.: 7279 |
I love the way it works now. That is to say you can only browse the selected files with previous/next when several files are selected. Your proposal would break this feature, unless it comes in another menu entry.
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2003, 12:20
Post
#98
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 244 Joined: 1-September 03 Member No.: 8630 |
QUOTE (zegilles @ Dec 20 2003, 02:52 AM) I love the way it works now. That is to say you can only browse the selected files with previous/next when several files are selected. Your proposal would break this feature, unless it comes in another menu entry. dude. previous/next works without highlighting anything. so it would leave this functionality intact., and wouldnt break anything |
|
|
|
Dec 20 2003, 12:37
Post
#99
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 84 Joined: 19-June 03 Member No.: 7279 |
QUOTE (aron @ Dec 20 2003, 12:20 PM) QUOTE (zegilles @ Dec 20 2003, 02:52 AM) I love the way it works now. That is to say you can only browse the selected files with previous/next when several files are selected. Your proposal would break this feature, unless it comes in another menu entry. dude. previous/next works without highlighting anything. so it would leave this functionality intact., and wouldnt break anything k, I say it again: the prev/next browsing is limited to the selected files when you select more than one file. |
|
|
|
Dec 20 2003, 12:40
Post
#100
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 244 Joined: 1-September 03 Member No.: 8630 |
QUOTE (zegilles @ Dec 20 2003, 03:37 AM) QUOTE (aron @ Dec 20 2003, 12:20 PM) QUOTE (zegilles @ Dec 20 2003, 02:52 AM) I love the way it works now. That is to say you can only browse the selected files with previous/next when several files are selected. Your proposal would break this feature, unless it comes in another menu entry. dude. previous/next works without highlighting anything. so it would leave this functionality intact., and wouldnt break anything k, I say it again: the prev/next browsing is limited to the selected files when you select more than one file. there are easy ways around this issue. for example, a simple option in the preferences. "view multiple highlighted items together, or one by one (limits scope of previous/next)" |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 19:38 |