add "MP3+V" to the title of this forum |
add "MP3+V" to the title of this forum |
Oct 17 2001, 20:03
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 30-September 01 Member No.: 82 |
so the board name will be "MP3/MP3Pro/MP3+V"
There's a new technology out there. It's called Plus-V (or MP3+V). It follows a similar approach than MP3 Pro. It creates an MP3-compatible baselayer bitstream and adds another layer of proprietary high frequency coding. Of course this is NOT high quality. What they do is a parametric approach to encode noise power in high frequency subbands and separately encoding additional harmonics. I'd love to hear how it will sound. Check out their website. http://www.plusv.org/intro.php Unfortunately, they got patents on this. [ This is a double-posting and also appeared on r3mix.net ;-) ] |
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 19 2001, 16:32
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 18-October 01 Member No.: 315 |
>It's definitely nice to have a Plus-V developer
>here! I hope you don't mind if we discuss the >here. ;-) This board was meant to be a place for >discussing a variety of audio formats. No, I don't mind at all. Just notice that I have _tons_ of things to do and it may very well be that I don't see all the questions I might be able to help with. >Someone on the OGG-Vorbis mailinglist criticized >that your library links to FFTW - which is GPL'ed >software. That someone was right, and I am to blame. The download packages were removed immediately when I found out of the problem this morning. Now the packages are there again, but FFTW is replaced with a general, vanilla 512-point FFT. I had a little e-mail conversation with FFTW guys Steven G. Johnson and Matteo Frigo, and I must say that they were real gentlemen when it came to solving the issue. In addition to that, they gave me some invaluable advice regarding patents and licenses. Thanks to them, I believe that we are going to be able to define our official "legalese" license policy by the end of the next week. Meanwhile: all free software developers will for certain be allowed to use the source codes and the format freely, as long as they don't intentionally break it ( = make it incompatible with itself). Kind regards, - Leopold |
|
|
|
cbuchner1 add "MP3+V" to the title of this forum Oct 17 2001, 20:03
TrNSZ What seems interesting is that the tools are imple... Oct 17 2001, 21:31
Garf I had a little listen. It doesn't have the metalli... Oct 18 2001, 11:30
TrNSZ Also, at this point, I'm really unimpressed with t... Oct 18 2001, 11:34
Garf QUOTE Originally posted by TrNSZ
Also, at this po... Oct 18 2001, 12:39
TrNSZ Yeah, so to playback the file, I wonder if the +V ... Oct 18 2001, 12:51
leopold PlusV doesn't require decoding the full bitstream ... Oct 18 2001, 13:23
YouriP I think this is an amiable effort in reproducing S... Oct 18 2001, 16:48
cbuchner1 QUOTE Originally posted by leopold
If you have an... Oct 18 2001, 17:58
leopold >I think this is an amiable effort in reproduci... Oct 19 2001, 16:39
Ivan Dimkovic Menno (FAAD) and I thought about AAC implementatio... Oct 19 2001, 21:13
cbuchner1 The WinAmp plugin V1.01 for Plus-V is here.
http:... Oct 20 2001, 06:49
ff123 The plusv winamp plugin and other downloads can be... Oct 20 2001, 07:16
cbuchner1 QUOTE Originally posted by ff123
The plusv winamp... Oct 20 2001, 09:06
ff123 QUOTE Nope. After using the DiskWriter plugin with... Oct 20 2001, 12:42
Wish http://mbnet.fi/~gridle/in_plusv.zip
The other pl... Oct 20 2001, 23:57
cbuchner1 QUOTE Originally posted by Wish
The other plugi... Oct 21 2001, 03:05
YouriP Well, these are probably just some growing pains t... Oct 21 2001, 19:28
xiphmont I visited the www.plusv.org forums because I had s... Oct 22 2001, 01:20
jianxin yan hi.
you'd better register at first. than you will ... Oct 22 2001, 14:09
xiphmont QUOTE Originally posted by jianxin yan
hi.
you'd ... Oct 26 2001, 06:30![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 14:56 |