DivX 5.11 released, mainly speed improvements |
![]() ![]() |
DivX 5.11 released, mainly speed improvements |
Nov 20 2003, 10:16
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1046 Joined: 28-June 03 From: on the dock of the bay Member No.: 7423 |
divx / pro 5.11 has just been released. it isn't yet anounced at the main page, but alreaedy can be downloaded at divx.com :
gainbundle: http://www.divx.com/divx/?src=toptab_divx_/index.php pro: http://www.divx.com/divx/pro/upgrade.php what's new: http://www.divx.com/divx/divxpro/versions.php cheers, Digga This post has been edited by Digga: Nov 20 2003, 10:17 -------------------- Nothing but a Heartache - Since I found my Baby ;)
|
|
|
|
Nov 20 2003, 10:44
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1234 Joined: 5-October 01 Member No.: 220 |
QUOTE DivX 5.1.1 encoder is up to 112% faster (standard mode) than 5.1 (up to 30% faster than 5.05). 30% sounds like alot but if I'm not mistaken 30% means that if 5.05 was encoding 1 fps 5.11 will produce 1.3 fps |
|
|
|
Nov 20 2003, 11:02
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1046 Joined: 28-June 03 From: on the dock of the bay Member No.: 7423 |
QUOTE (westgroveg @ Nov 20 2003, 10:44 AM) QUOTE DivX 5.1.1 encoder is up to 112% faster (standard mode) than 5.1 (up to 30% faster than 5.05). 30% sounds like alot but if I'm not mistaken 30% means that if 5.05 was encoding 1 fps 5.11 will produce 1.3 fps yes *education mode on* but keep in mind that with 5.05 slow mode you get more something like up from 10 fps, so the speed improvements are more visible; and that 5.1 standard is equal to 5.05 slow(est) *education mode off* happy encoding everyone! This post has been edited by Digga: Nov 20 2003, 11:02 -------------------- Nothing but a Heartache - Since I found my Baby ;)
|
|
|
|
Nov 20 2003, 12:15
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 75 Joined: 11-November 03 Member No.: 9773 |
Are these speed improvements due to usage of cpu instructions in newer processors and therefore non-existent on older computers?
|
|
|
|
Nov 20 2003, 13:34
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1046 Joined: 28-June 03 From: on the dock of the bay Member No.: 7423 |
QUOTE (cheerow @ Nov 20 2003, 12:15 PM) Are these speed improvements due to usage of cpu instructions in newer processors and therefore non-existent on older computers? IIRC the speed improvements happen on all systems, so with a pII 400mhz you should get similar 'boosts' than with a p4 2.0ghz. anyway, why don't you try it on your machine and post fps (and mybe time of encoding) together with your settings here? -------------------- Nothing but a Heartache - Since I found my Baby ;)
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2004, 23:07
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 82 Joined: 8-June 03 Member No.: 7052 |
I got pen4 3.0c 800 fsb
1gb ram and im using vidomi to backup dvd @ slowest mode...6 frame/s normal mode : real time: 40 f/s so the normal mode is the slowest mode in divx 505? -------------------- My Favorite Lame Preset
--alt-preset fast insane |
|
|
|
Jan 10 2004, 23:15
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 23 Joined: 13-December 01 Member No.: 633 |
Which version is which? Meaning I understand that one of the versions has spyware in it if what I am told is true.
TIA. This post has been edited by TWPD: Jan 10 2004, 23:27 |
|
|
|
Jan 11 2004, 00:15
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 50 Joined: 9-December 03 From: China Member No.: 10315 |
DivX 5.1.1 only is completely free.
DivX 5.1.1 PRO has spyware (the downloadable version) There's also DivX 5.1.1 pro, with no spyware, if you want to pay for it. |
|
|
|
Jan 12 2004, 06:19
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 15-August 02 From: Darwin Member No.: 3061 |
It's hardly spyware as it installs nothing without your consent.
In case anyone doesn't know the totally free non-pro version will decode all pro encoded content. The standard mode in 5.1.1 is roughly equivalent to the slowest mode in 5.0.5. -------------------- Watch out where the huskies go,
Don't you eat that yellow snow |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2004, 20:50
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1046 Joined: 28-June 03 From: on the dock of the bay Member No.: 7423 |
... to avoid any confusion on the use of divx and spyware ...
read this: http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?threadid=19583 QUOTE One lousy registry keys is all there is to it
-------------------- Nothing but a Heartache - Since I found my Baby ;)
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2004, 02:08
Post
#11
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 568 Joined: 10-July 03 From: Australia Member No.: 7693 |
Hi Digga,
PCMark04 P4 3.00 1GB DDR400 DivX 5.1.1 Pro Compression 59.3 ~ 60.0 fps I too believe it is faster although some don't seem to like the latest build and like the 5.05 better. This post has been edited by ~*McoreD*~: Jan 27 2004, 02:10 |
|
|
|
Jan 27 2004, 02:15
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1046 Joined: 28-June 03 From: on the dock of the bay Member No.: 7423 |
QUOTE (~*McoreD*~ @ Jan 27 2004, 02:08 AM) Hi Digga, PCMark04 P4 3.00 1GB DDR400 DivX 5.1.1 Pro 59.3 ~ 60.0 fps hi 1. pc-mark - uhm, so what? what is this info for? 2. whoa, 60 fps is not bad at all! never experienced something like that, but I run a XP 1800 on my encoding machine. are you sure about that values, especially with divx 5.1.1?! though fps are quite useless, if you don't post the settings you used... edit: ah, sorry, just checked. in contrast to pcmark02, v04 now features divx benchmarking. though I doubt this is a usefull reference without knowing the settings. This post has been edited by Digga: Jan 27 2004, 04:11 -------------------- Nothing but a Heartache - Since I found my Baby ;)
|
|
|
|
Mar 16 2004, 22:47
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 723 Joined: 29-November 01 Member No.: 563 |
It's good that they're somewhat ironed out the DVD-quality range bug - on my PIII-733, anything I encoded at 640×480 would have the audio and video completely out of sync. I thought this was just because the programming in DivX for playback was just pisspoor, but the sync problem was still present when I played these videos on my Celeron 2.6 GHz.
Material encoded with 5.11 and played back on the Celeron only has minimal sync issues, which are present when there is significant CPU load anyway. Nothing can be done about that. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 07:02 |