IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
DivX 5.11 released, mainly speed improvements
Digga
post Nov 20 2003, 10:16
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 1046
Joined: 28-June 03
From: on the dock of the bay
Member No.: 7423



divx / pro 5.11 has just been released. it isn't yet anounced at the main page, but alreaedy can be downloaded at divx.com :
gainbundle: http://www.divx.com/divx/?src=toptab_divx_/index.php
pro: http://www.divx.com/divx/pro/upgrade.php

what's new: http://www.divx.com/divx/divxpro/versions.php

cheers,
Digga

This post has been edited by Digga: Nov 20 2003, 10:17


--------------------
Nothing but a Heartache - Since I found my Baby ;)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
westgroveg
post Nov 20 2003, 10:44
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 1235
Joined: 5-October 01
Member No.: 220



QUOTE
DivX 5.1.1 encoder is up to 112% faster (standard mode) than 5.1 (up to 30% faster than 5.05).

30% sounds like alot but if I'm not mistaken 30% means that if 5.05 was encoding 1 fps 5.11 will produce 1.3 fps wink.gif .
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Digga
post Nov 20 2003, 11:02
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 1046
Joined: 28-June 03
From: on the dock of the bay
Member No.: 7423



QUOTE (westgroveg @ Nov 20 2003, 10:44 AM)
QUOTE
DivX 5.1.1 encoder is up to 112% faster (standard mode) than 5.1 (up to 30% faster than 5.05).

30% sounds like alot but if I'm not mistaken 30% means that if 5.05 was encoding 1 fps 5.11 will produce 1.3 fps wink.gif .

yes laugh.gif
*education mode on* but keep in mind that with 5.05 slow mode you get more something like up from 10 fps, so the speed improvements are more visible; and that 5.1 standard is equal to 5.05 slow(est) *education mode off* wink.gif

happy encoding everyone!

This post has been edited by Digga: Nov 20 2003, 11:02


--------------------
Nothing but a Heartache - Since I found my Baby ;)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cheerow
post Nov 20 2003, 12:15
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 75
Joined: 11-November 03
Member No.: 9773



Are these speed improvements due to usage of cpu instructions in newer processors and therefore non-existent on older computers?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Digga
post Nov 20 2003, 13:34
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 1046
Joined: 28-June 03
From: on the dock of the bay
Member No.: 7423



QUOTE (cheerow @ Nov 20 2003, 12:15 PM)
Are these speed improvements due to usage of cpu instructions in newer processors and therefore non-existent on older computers?

IIRC the speed improvements happen on all systems, so with a pII 400mhz you should get similar 'boosts' than with a p4 2.0ghz.
anyway, why don't you try it on your machine and post fps (and mybe time of encoding) together with your settings here?


--------------------
Nothing but a Heartache - Since I found my Baby ;)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Opeth
post Jan 10 2004, 23:07
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 82
Joined: 8-June 03
Member No.: 7052



I got pen4 3.0c 800 fsb

1gb ram

and im using vidomi to backup dvd @ slowest mode...6 frame/s

normal mode : real time: 40 f/s

so the normal mode is the slowest mode in divx 505?


--------------------
My Favorite Lame Preset

--alt-preset fast insane
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TWPD
post Jan 10 2004, 23:15
Post #7





Group: Banned
Posts: 23
Joined: 13-December 01
Member No.: 633



Which version is which? Meaning I understand that one of the versions has spyware in it if what I am told is true.

TIA.

This post has been edited by TWPD: Jan 10 2004, 23:27
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
p0l1m0rph1c
post Jan 11 2004, 00:15
Post #8





Group: Members
Posts: 50
Joined: 9-December 03
From: China
Member No.: 10315



DivX 5.1.1 only is completely free.
DivX 5.1.1 PRO has spyware (the downloadable version)

There's also DivX 5.1.1 pro, with no spyware, if you want to pay for it.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dTb
post Jan 12 2004, 06:19
Post #9





Group: Members
Posts: 36
Joined: 15-August 02
From: Darwin
Member No.: 3061



It's hardly spyware as it installs nothing without your consent.

In case anyone doesn't know the totally free non-pro version will decode all pro encoded content.

The standard mode in 5.1.1 is roughly equivalent to the slowest mode in 5.0.5.


--------------------
Watch out where the huskies go,
Don't you eat that yellow snow
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Digga
post Jan 26 2004, 20:50
Post #10





Group: Members
Posts: 1046
Joined: 28-June 03
From: on the dock of the bay
Member No.: 7423



... to avoid any confusion on the use of divx and spyware ...
read this:
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?threadid=19583
QUOTE
One lousy registry keys is all there is to it


--------------------
Nothing but a Heartache - Since I found my Baby ;)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
~*McoreD*~
post Jan 27 2004, 02:08
Post #11





Group: Members
Posts: 568
Joined: 10-July 03
From: Australia
Member No.: 7693



Hi Digga,

PCMark04

P4 3.00
1GB DDR400

DivX 5.1.1 Pro Compression
59.3 ~ 60.0 fps

I too believe it is faster although some don't seem to like the latest build and like the 5.05 better.

This post has been edited by ~*McoreD*~: Jan 27 2004, 02:10
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Digga
post Jan 27 2004, 02:15
Post #12





Group: Members
Posts: 1046
Joined: 28-June 03
From: on the dock of the bay
Member No.: 7423



QUOTE (~*McoreD*~ @ Jan 27 2004, 02:08 AM)
Hi Digga,
PCMark04
P4 3.00
1GB DDR400
DivX 5.1.1 Pro
59.3 ~ 60.0 fps

hi smile.gif
1. pc-mark - uhm, so what? what is this info for?
2. whoa, 60 fps is not bad at all! never experienced something like that, but I run a XP 1800 on my encoding machine. are you sure about that values, especially with divx 5.1.1?!
though fps are quite useless, if you don't post the settings you used...

edit: ah, sorry, just checked. in contrast to pcmark02, v04 now features divx benchmarking. though I doubt this is a usefull reference without knowing the settings.

This post has been edited by Digga: Jan 27 2004, 04:11


--------------------
Nothing but a Heartache - Since I found my Baby ;)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
NeoRenegade
post Mar 16 2004, 22:47
Post #13





Group: Members
Posts: 723
Joined: 29-November 01
Member No.: 563



It's good that they're somewhat ironed out the DVD-quality range bug - on my PIII-733, anything I encoded at 640480 would have the audio and video completely out of sync. I thought this was just because the programming in DivX for playback was just pisspoor, but the sync problem was still present when I played these videos on my Celeron 2.6 GHz.

Material encoded with 5.11 and played back on the Celeron only has minimal sync issues, which are present when there is significant CPU load anyway. Nothing can be done about that. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th April 2014 - 11:41