Choice of AAC codecs for listening test |
- No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service
Choice of AAC codecs for listening test |
Feb 9 2004, 04:49
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81 |
Hello.
I'm creating this poll so users can choose what codecs to be features at the AAC test. Three codecs are already decided: iTunes, Nero and Faac. So, please vote on the remaining two AAC codecs. The anchor will be decided in another poll. Thank-you. Regards; Roberto. -------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
|
|
|
![]() |
Feb 9 2004, 17:35
Post
#2
|
|
|
Moderator Group: Members Posts: 1434 Joined: 26-November 02 Member No.: 3890 |
ABC/HR results
QUOTE ABC/HR Version 0.9b, 30 August 2002 Testname: DaFunk 1L = N:\DaFunk_1.wav 2R = N:\DaFunk_2.wav --------------------------------------- General Comments: --------------------------------------- 1L File: N:\DaFunk_1.wav 1L Rating: 3.5 1L Comment: 0.0-3.3: flanging, clackling noise, difference gets easily lost during quick ABXing 3.3-16.0: differences less obvious/annoying 16.0-20.6: differences similar to the beginning --------------------------------------- 2R File: N:\DaFunk_2.wav 2R Rating: 2.5 2R Comment: 0.0-3.3: flanging, 'airy' bumping noises added, very obvious, annoying 3.3-16.0: differences less obvious/annoying 16.0-20.6: differences similar to the beginning --------------------------------------- ABX Results: Original vs N:\DaFunk_1.wav 11 out of 15, pval = 0.059 Original vs N:\DaFunk_2.wav 6 out of 6, pval = 0.016 N:\DaFunk_1.wav vs N:\DaFunk_2.wav 6 out of 6, pval = 0.016 QUOTE ABC/HR Version 0.9b, 30 August 2002
Testname: Gone 1L = N:\gone_2.wav 2L = N:\gone_1.wav --------------------------------------- General Comments: --------------------------------------- 1L File: N:\gone_2.wav 1L Rating: 3.0 1L Comment: 2.5-5.0: background noise brighter + changed (bumping) --------------------------------------- 2L File: N:\gone_1.wav 2L Rating: 3.0 2L Comment: 2.5-5.0: similar to 1, there seems to be a difference, but hard to tell which is better starting at 9.0 there's flanging (cymbal sounds), again different between 1 and 2 but impossible to tell which is better for me. --------------------------------------- ABX Results: Original vs N:\gone_2.wav 6 out of 6, pval = 0.016 Original vs N:\gone_1.wav 12 out of 16, pval = 0.038 N:\gone_2.wav vs N:\gone_1.wav 6 out of 6, pval = 0.016 -------------------- Let's suppose that rain washes out a picnic. Who is feeling negative? The rain? Or YOU? What's causing the negative feeling? The rain or your reaction? - Anthony De Mello
|
|
|
|
rjamorim Choice of AAC codecs for listening test Feb 9 2004, 04:49
Cey I vote for Winamp because it is *very* widely avai... Feb 9 2004, 04:59
mdmuir Winamp and Real, only because of pervasive availab... Feb 9 2004, 05:01
guest0101 Agree with mdmuir, WinAmp and Real to represent th... Feb 9 2004, 05:05
MGuti compaact and winamp: AFAIK real aac can't real... Feb 9 2004, 05:09
kl33per compaact, because (As far as I know) it's comp... Feb 9 2004, 05:11
harashin I'd like to see a FhG's encoder in the tes... Feb 9 2004, 05:20
rjamorim Something worth mentioning (so that later people d... Feb 9 2004, 05:50
Mike Giacomelli What is winamp's decoder? Completely new or b... Feb 9 2004, 06:02
bond looks like people want winamp in either way and th... Feb 9 2004, 10:13
WEST Rjamorim, please test Nero AAC Encoder 2.6.1.9 Feb 9 2004, 10:45
blessingx Real because I think it could have a greater impac... Feb 9 2004, 11:18
tigre Winamp, Real and Compaact, no anchor instead.
The... Feb 9 2004, 11:21
unmake Is it more important to test encoders which might ... Feb 9 2004, 11:27
kotrtim Null Vote
I suggest testing all the widely availab... Feb 9 2004, 13:14
p0l1m0rph1c I'd choose FhG's codec and compaact. Hence... Feb 9 2004, 13:25
rjamorim Hello. Menno just shouted at me on ICQ:
QUOTE m... Feb 9 2004, 14:55
bond maybe someone who has a clue about that should tes... Feb 9 2004, 15:01
rjamorim I'm creating two test sets, one with AAC files... Feb 9 2004, 15:06
rjamorim OK, I created a package. Samples are encoded with ... Feb 9 2004, 16:07
tigre Posts by brucewillis violating TOS #2 and #8 are s... Feb 9 2004, 16:34
Alexander Lerch QUOTE (rjamorim @ Feb 9 2004, 04:07 PM)No nee... Feb 9 2004, 16:42
john33 You don't ask for scientific evaluation, so, 2... Feb 9 2004, 17:13
JohnV We had a problem with a troll registering lots of ... Feb 9 2004, 17:48
Alexander Lerch QUOTE (JohnV @ Feb 9 2004, 05:48 PM)We had a ... Feb 9 2004, 18:02
JohnV QUOTE (Alexander Lerch @ Feb 9 2004, 07:02 PM... Feb 9 2004, 18:09
bond QUOTE (JohnV @ Feb 9 2004, 06:09 PM)what tigr... Feb 9 2004, 18:30
kwanbis QUOTE (JohnV @ Feb 9 2004, 05:09 PM)My opinio... Feb 9 2004, 18:40
kwanbis QUOTE (bond @ Feb 9 2004, 05:30 PM)QUOTE (Joh... Feb 9 2004, 18:44
Peter QUOTE (JohnV @ Feb 9 2004, 07:48 PM)Edit. Thi... Feb 9 2004, 18:44
netnichols QUOTE (zZzZzZz @ Feb 9 2004, 09:44 AM)Their e... Feb 9 2004, 18:54
menno About this Winamp issue:
It is not clipping.
And... Feb 9 2004, 18:59
Alexander Lerch QUOTE (zZzZzZz @ Feb 9 2004, 06:44 PM)Their e... Feb 9 2004, 19:24
tigre QUOTE (Alexander Lerch @ Feb 9 2004, 08:24 PM... Feb 9 2004, 19:38
JohnV QUOTE (Alexander Lerch @ Feb 9 2004, 08:24 PM... Feb 9 2004, 19:38
Peter I don't personally care which codecs are inclu... Feb 9 2004, 19:40
JohnV QUOTE (tigre @ Feb 9 2004, 08:38 PM)If one of... Feb 9 2004, 19:45
rjamorim QUOTE (tigre @ Feb 9 2004, 04:38 PM)If one of... Feb 9 2004, 19:56![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 11:42 |