[OFFENSIVE] brucewillis anti real rant + responses, split from 'Choice of AAC for test' Poll |
- No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service
[OFFENSIVE] brucewillis anti real rant + responses, split from 'Choice of AAC for test' Poll |
Feb 9 2004, 15:18
Post
#1
|
|
|
Troll Group: Banned Posts: 2 Joined: 9-February 04 Member No.: 11889 |
i would like to see the compaact codec tested because its audio quality is superior to most of the other aac encoders suggested here, anyway (and "real" in particular). besides it offers some important audio preprocessing features.
oh, i forgot something... "real" r e a l l y sucks! |
|
|
|
brucewillis [OFFENSIVE] brucewillis anti real rant + responses Feb 9 2004, 15:18
brucewillis still got one comment left: this one goes out to m... Feb 9 2004, 15:34
rjamorim QUOTE (brucewillis @ Feb 9 2004, 12:34 PM)it ... Feb 9 2004, 15:47
karl_lillevold QUOTE (brucewillis @ Feb 9 2004, 06:34 AM)ran... Feb 9 2004, 16:17![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 10:25 |