Discussion related to multiple format tests' resul, Split from AAC @ 128kbps listening test |
Discussion related to multiple format tests' resul, Split from AAC @ 128kbps listening test |
Feb 11 2004, 20:42
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 16 Joined: 11-February 04 Member No.: 11959 |
Split from here. This topic has been discussed to death in the threads related to the multiformat listening tests.
If you want to add something here, re-read these threads first. Only post here if you have something new to say, please - tigre ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- There is something else that I think would give all codecs a fairer chance. Even though using VBR whenever possible it would be helpfull trying to achieve similar filesizes. (I remember the multiformat 128kpbs test where Musepack was a winner but at the expense of files 11,7% larger than the close second QT AAC.) This post has been edited by tigre: Feb 12 2004, 21:06 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Feb 12 2004, 20:46
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 707 Joined: 20-July 03 From: Canada Member No.: 7895 |
QUOTE (duartix @ Feb 12 2004, 11:31 AM) My point is that the day such a codec like Quicktime AAC implements CQ (VBR) encoding, it will use a lower bitrate to achieve the same quality. Clear? Ah yes, very clear. Thank you very much for the clairification. QUOTE (duartix @ Feb 12 2004, 11:31 AM) This is a 128kbps test for sound quality, right? So let's isolate the bitrate and test for quality! Otherwise we'll all be encoding at --braindead because we don't need these tiresome ABX tests... What does this mean, though? -------------------- gentoo ~amd64 + layman | ncmpcpp/mpd | wavpack + vorbis + lame
|
|
|
|
duartix Discussion related to multiple format tests' resul Feb 11 2004, 20:42
schnofler QUOTE (duartix)I remember the multiformat 128kpbs ... Feb 11 2004, 21:49
music_man_mpc QUOTE (duartix @ Feb 11 2004, 11:42 AM)There ... Feb 11 2004, 22:02
rjamorim QUOTE (schnofler @ Feb 11 2004, 06:49 PM)Good... Feb 11 2004, 22:22
Continuum Yes, but then the set is not chosen optimally (bal... Feb 11 2004, 22:31
music_man_mpc QUOTE (Continuum @ Feb 11 2004, 01:31 PM)I... Feb 12 2004, 17:01
duartix QUOTE ARGH!! The Musepack files were only ... Feb 12 2004, 20:31
duartix It means that even though we are not as restricted... Feb 12 2004, 20:52
Continuum QUOTE (music_man_mpc @ Feb 12 2004, 05:01 PM)... Feb 12 2004, 22:55
rjamorim QUOTE (Continuum @ Feb 12 2004, 07:55 PM)Sadl... Feb 12 2004, 23:41
guruboolez QUOTE (Continuum @ Feb 12 2004, 10:55 PM)I di... Feb 14 2004, 21:22
Continuum QUOTE (guruboolez @ Feb 14 2004, 09:22 PM)I t... Feb 14 2004, 21:52
guruboolez QUOTE (Continuum @ Feb 14 2004, 09:52 PM)Mayb... Feb 14 2004, 22:05
Continuum I thought that's how it has been done? The ave... Feb 14 2004, 22:13
rjamorim QUOTE (Continuum @ Feb 14 2004, 07:13 PM)Mayb... Feb 14 2004, 22:23
guruboolez QUOTE (Continuum @ Feb 14 2004, 10:13 PM)My p... Feb 14 2004, 22:28
rjamorim QUOTE (guruboolez @ Feb 14 2004, 07:28 PM)I... Feb 14 2004, 22:36
guruboolez I like this sample
Did you try this another pian... Feb 14 2004, 22:45
spoon With Roberto's permission I am running backgro... Feb 15 2004, 00:19
rjamorim Yes, thank-you very much, Spoon Feb 15 2004, 00:20![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 02:54 |