GT3b2 with HF Reduction, Proof of concept |
GT3b2 with HF Reduction, Proof of concept |
Feb 27 2004, 02:37
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 1245 Joined: 16-December 02 From: Australia Member No.: 4097 |
I've included the HF boost reduction technique I used in QKTune beta 3.2 into the current GT3b2, as a proof of concept.
You can download the binary here: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....ndpost&p=188227 The nice pre-echo handling of the original GT3b2 may be slightly worse. Start at -q 5 and compare this with the original GT3b1/GT3b2 and see whether the HF boost is there or not. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Feb 27 2004, 03:52
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 1245 Joined: 16-December 02 From: Australia Member No.: 4097 |
QUOTE (guruboolez @ Feb 27 2004, 12:43 PM) The second one. When you said 'start at -q5', does it mean that we have to follow the test with -q6, -q7..., or with -q4, -q3...? (sorry if it sounds stupid, but I didn't follow HA during a whole week, and I probably miss some important informations). That's ok. Theoretically, these changes should reduce HF boost in all quality ranges, even though when I tuned it in QKTune beta 3.2, I used q 4. This is because the changes are not quality-dependent. I suggested people start with q 5 because that is where the benefits of Garf's tunings start to occur so we have (hopefully) a combination of good pre-echo handling and low HF boost. I want to see if this technique can improve other tuned encoders as well, not just my own. But yeah, my feeling is that it will work on all quality levels that use lossy stereo coupling (q < 6). So feel free to try it on q 1,2,3,4, which is the 1.0.1 tuning range (ie. poor pre-echo handling). This post has been edited by QuantumKnot: Feb 27 2004, 04:01 |
|
|
|
QuantumKnot GT3b2 with HF Reduction Feb 27 2004, 02:37
guruboolez I can't test it for the moment, but could you ... Feb 27 2004, 03:31
QuantumKnot QUOTE (guruboolez @ Feb 27 2004, 12:31 PM)I c... Feb 27 2004, 03:40
guruboolez
The second one.
When you said 'start at -q5... Feb 27 2004, 03:43
music_man_mpc QUOTE (guruboolez @ Feb 26 2004, 06:43 PM)Whe... Feb 27 2004, 03:51
QuantumKnot QUOTE (music_man_mpc @ Feb 27 2004, 12:51 PM)... Feb 27 2004, 03:57
harashin Some results of mine.
hustlejet at q5 castanets a... Feb 27 2004, 05:20
QuantumKnot Many thanks. Looks like GT3b2 is benefitting fro... Feb 27 2004, 06:38
harashin Megrim disappears now... Well, these ones include ... Feb 27 2004, 08:11
QuantumKnot Those are very encouraging results Did you hear... Feb 27 2004, 11:34
harashin QUOTE (QuantumKnot @ Feb 27 2004, 07:34 PM)Th... Feb 27 2004, 12:28
QuantumKnot Many thanks for your invaluable tests.
Well, my s... Feb 27 2004, 12:46
Cobra Just make sure that Monty see this code (inform hi... Feb 27 2004, 13:23
guruboolez I’m in holidays, and I don’t have access to my mai... Feb 27 2004, 14:45
Big_Berny QuantumKnot, I only want to thank you for all your... Feb 27 2004, 21:28
QuantumKnot Many thanks to guruboolez for his listening tests.... Feb 28 2004, 02:43
QuantumKnot btw. Has anyone heard any change when raising the ... Feb 28 2004, 09:33
nyaochi QUOTE (QuantumKnot @ Feb 28 2004, 05:33 PM)bt... Feb 28 2004, 11:07
harashin As guys said, Brahms3 isn't hard to ABX to me,... Feb 28 2004, 11:27
QuantumKnot It's a very quiet sample and I started getting... Feb 28 2004, 11:43
Biont QuantumKnot, after all this testing, is your versi... Mar 22 2004, 16:34
QuantumKnot QUOTE (Biont @ Mar 23 2004, 01:34 AM)QuantumK... Mar 23 2004, 00:45![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th June 2013 - 05:58 |