How good is AAC for archiving? (192 kb/s) |
  |
How good is AAC for archiving? (192 kb/s) |
 Jun 9 2002, 02:03
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 290 Joined: 5-April 02 From: Guadalajara, Jalisco Member No.: 1693  |
I use to archive my music using lastest lame at extreme vbr, but i wanna know how good is aac to archive music as well? 192 is the maximum i would use.
|
 |
 
|
|
Jun 9 2002, 05:14
Post
#2
|
|
 Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81 |
Using AACenc with -extreme profile, you will get bitrates around that and transparency on 99%+ of the musics.
Even with -normal you will get great quality. Regards; Roberto. -------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
|
|
|
|
Jun 11 2002, 04:30
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1394 Joined: 20-December 01 From: seattle Member No.: 693 |
yes, i would second that.
through some [non] intensive testing i still haven't been able to abx the source vs. extreme or archive. and ivan is the man, btw. later mike -------------------- RareWares/Debian :: http://www.rarewares.org/debian.html
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 11 2002, 06:39
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 684 Joined: 15-December 01 From: Denmark Member No.: 655 |
AAC iis better then mp3 at 192. even if you use dibroms tweakings
just be sure to use lates version of the psytell encoder -------------------- Sven Bent - Denmark
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 15:54 |
