various oggenc |
  |
various oggenc |
 Apr 27 2004, 21:14
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 92 Joined: 13-December 03 Member No.: 10415  |
With so many versions of oggenc floating around, i thought of putting together a list of some of them.
encoder: aoTuV beta 2 vendor : AO; aoTuV b2 [20040420] (based on Xiph.Org's 1.0.1) remarks: tuning done by aoyumi for all bitrates aoyumi's encoders encoder: aoTuV pre beta 2 vendor : AO; aoTuV b2 test [20040402] (based on Xiph.Org's 1.0.1) remarks: tuning done by aoyumi for all bitrates aoyumi's encoders encoder: aoTuV pre beta 2 + QK 3.2 vendor : AO; aoTuV b2 test [20040402]+QKTune beta 3.2 (based on Xiph.Org's 1.0.1) remarks: merge of tuning by aoyumi and Quantum Knot (w/o HFR) Quantum Knot's encoders encoder: GT3b1 vendor : Xiph.Org/Sjeng.Org libVorbis I 20020717 (GTune 3, beta 1) remarks: tunings by Garf for high bitrates (q >= 5), based on vorbis 1.0 Garf's encoder encoder: GT3b2 vendor : Xiph.Org/Sjeng.Org libVorbis I 20031230 (GTune 3 beta 2) remarks: tunings by Garf for high bitrates (q >= 5), based on vorbis 1.0.1 GT3b2 Encoder encoder: GT3b2 + HFR vendor : Xiph.Org/Sjeng.Org libVorbis I 20031230 (GTune 3 beta 2 with HF Reduction) remarks: Garf's tuning merged with Quantum Knot's HFR Quantum Knot's encoders encoder: QKTune beta 3.2 vendor : Xiph.Org libVorbis I 20031230 (QKTune beta 3.2) EXPERIMENTAL remarks: tuning for pre echo and high freq reduction by Quantum Knot Quantum Knot's encoders As of now it is recomended to use GT3b2 for encoding with q >= 5 For q <= 4 it is recomended to use aoTuV beta 2 Let me know if i missed some encoder or information is incorrect / inaccurate. [edit: links added] This post has been edited by phoolgobi: Apr 27 2004, 22:44 |
 |
 
|
|
Apr 27 2004, 21:35
Post
#2
|
|
 Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81 |
I recommend you add links.
-------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
|
|
|
|
Apr 27 2004, 22:45
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 92 Joined: 13-December 03 Member No.: 10415 |
QUOTE (rjamorim @ Apr 27 2004, 12:35 PM) I recommend you add links. done 
This post has been edited by phoolgobi: Apr 27 2004, 22:46 |
|
|
|
|
Apr 27 2004, 23:13
Post
#4
|
|
|
Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81 |
Nice.
You are missing Nyaochi's Modest Tuning: http://nyaochi.cocolog-nifty.com/audio/200...c_modest_t.html -------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
|
|
|
|
May 13 2004, 19:02
Post
#5
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 346 Joined: 7-July 03 From: 15 & Ryan Member No.: 7619 |
This thread should be stickied.
-------------------- I am *expanding!* It is so much *squishy* to *smell* you! *Campers* are the best! I have *anticipation* and then what? Better parties in *the middle* for sure.
http://www.phong.org/ |
|
|
|
|
May 13 2004, 21:29
Post
#6
|
|
 Group: Developer Posts: 1679 Joined: 23-December 01 From: Germany Member No.: 731 |
Not sure about that, since some of these are just ment for testing and not recommendable for general usage yet.
I'd rather add more information to the Recommended Encoder Versions and Settings thread once some of the forks have 'stabelized' and are ready for general purpose usage. rjamorim's test will hopefully produce some meaningful results. -------------------- "To understand me, you'll have to swallow a world." Or maybe your words.
|
|
|
|
| Guest_OggZealot_* |
May 13 2004, 22:24
Post
#7
|
|
Guests |
I agree with devO I don't think all these experimental encoders should be sticky ... I think actually making listening tests in order to know if AOb2 is superior GT3b2 at all bitrate & in order to see if AOb2 should be the new overall HA recommended encoder would be much more clever than blindly adding every fork that exists ...
... not everyone even agree with GT3b2 being worth the bitrate jump so if all this forks get added that will become an even bigger mess ... my personnal feeling is that V1.01 should be the recommended oggenc for newbies & AOb2 the recommended fork for advanced users (... with advanced earing) |
|
|
|
|
May 16 2004, 21:31
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 4-June 03 Member No.: 6995 |
The GT3b1 encoder also has Garf's "Floggy" tuning. To enable it use files with 8KHz or 6KHz sample rates at q's -1 through -2 (yes, the Floggy tuning has a -2 q). I've found that below q -1, mono files have very loud screeching artifacts while stereo files have no problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 00:28 |
