[USELESS] Is Ogg Vorbis aoTuV b2 Q=4,44, transparent for you? |
Hydrogenaudio Forum Rules - No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service
[USELESS] Is Ogg Vorbis aoTuV b2 Q=4,44, transparent for you? |
  Jul 11 2004, 20:18
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Banned Posts: 27 Joined: 8-July 04 Member No.: 15155  |
Is Ogg Vorbis aoTuV b2 Q=4,44 transparent for you?
I mean YOUR music, not special killer samples. If it is not transparent, please tell me in what? |
 |
 
|
 |
|
Jul 11 2004, 20:20
Post
#2
|
|
|
A/V Moderator Group: Members Posts: 858 Joined: 12-May 03 From: Finland Member No.: 6557 |
Why q 4,44?
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2004, 20:23
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 27 Joined: 8-July 04 Member No.: 15155 |
QUOTE (Latexxx @ Jul 11 2004, 10:20 PM) Why q 4,44?  Well, I have to choose - codec itself is not transparent or not transparent - we can choose option in such poll only for certain bitrate. PLEASE SELECT CLOSEST ANSWER - so if you use Q=5 and it is transparent, select first option etc. |
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2004, 20:56
Post
#4
|
|
|
Founder Group: Admin Posts: 2958 Joined: 26-August 02 From: Nottingham, UK Member No.: 1 |
QUOTE (Celsus @ Jul 11 2004, 11:23 AM) QUOTE (Latexxx @ Jul 11 2004, 10:20 PM) Why q 4,44? Well, I have to choose - codec itself is not transparent or not transparent - we can choose option in such poll only for certain bitrate. PLEASE SELECT CLOSEST ANSWER - so if you use Q=5 and it is transparent, select first option etc. Umm.. if this is for yourself, why don't you do your own listening tests and determine that? It doesn't seem to make much sense to ask this kind of question, especially if you're asking people to listen "with their own music and not killer samples." |
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2004, 21:02
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 27 Joined: 8-July 04 Member No.: 15155 |
QUOTE (Dibrom @ Jul 11 2004, 10:56 PM) QUOTE (Celsus @ Jul 11 2004, 11:23 AM) QUOTE (Latexxx @ Jul 11 2004, 10:20 PM) Why q 4,44? Well, I have to choose - codec itself is not transparent or not transparent - we can choose option in such poll only for certain bitrate. PLEASE SELECT CLOSEST ANSWER - so if you use Q=5 and it is transparent, select first option etc. Umm.. if this is for yourself, why don't you do your own listening tests and determine that? It doesn't seem to make much sense to ask this kind of question, especially if you're asking people to listen "with their own music and not killer samples." I mean not "labolatory" environment, but how Ogg Vorbis aoTuV b2 Q=4,44 do its job in normal, everyday purposes. My music on my sennheiser headphones is transparent for me, no need to make "listening test" with killer samples - question is how it works for each user in his music. |
|
|
|
Celsus [USELESS] Is Ogg Vorbis aoTuV b2 Q=4,44 Jul 11 2004, 20:18
DreamTactix291 I suppose aoTuV b2 at 4.44 would be transparent en... Jul 11 2004, 21:06 analogy For portable use, I'll encode at Q0 to save sp... Jul 11 2004, 21:08 Latexxx What bitrate does q 4,44 represent? Jul 11 2004, 21:14 DreamTactix291 Nominal of 142.1kbps. Jul 11 2004, 21:15
Celsus QUOTE (DreamTactix291 @ Jul 11 2004, 11:15 PM... Jul 11 2004, 21:17 Latexxx Why q 4.44 why not 4, 4.5 or 5? Jul 11 2004, 21:21 Celsus QUOTE (Latexxx @ Jul 11 2004, 11:21 PM)Why q ... Jul 11 2004, 21:28 Frank_Bicking 8 people have voted so far, which would mean that ... Jul 11 2004, 21:32 guruboolez QUOTE (Frank_Bicking @ Jul 11 2004, 09:32 PM)... Jul 11 2004, 21:35 Celsus QUOTE (Frank_Bicking @ Jul 11 2004, 11:32 PM)... Jul 11 2004, 21:56 guruboolez QUOTE (Celsus @ Jul 11 2004, 09:56 PM)QUOTE (... Jul 11 2004, 22:00 Celsus QUOTE (guruboolez @ Jul 12 2004, 12:00 AM)QUO... Jul 11 2004, 22:06 guruboolez QUOTE (Celsus @ Jul 11 2004, 10:06 PM)but ... Jul 11 2004, 22:15 DeeZi A few preecho optimations should be done.
Like in ... Jul 11 2004, 21:33 eagleray 4.99 would make more sense to me as that is the cu... Jul 11 2004, 22:11 Celsus Ok, so we advice all people to do ABX But poll is... Jul 11 2004, 22:30 guruboolez QUOTE (Celsus @ Jul 11 2004, 10:30 PM)Ok, so ... Jul 11 2004, 22:34 Celsus I think that problem is on reader side. If poll is... Jul 11 2004, 22:51 indybrett QUOTE (Celsus @ Jul 11 2004, 04:51 PM)I don... Jul 11 2004, 23:26 Atlantis QUOTE (indybrett @ Jul 12 2004, 12:26 AM)QUOT... Jul 12 2004, 07:54 Celsus Well, everyone here has right to have his opinion.... Jul 12 2004, 09:25 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 19:09 |
