[USELESS] Is Ogg Vorbis aoTuV b2 Q=4,44, transparent for you? |
Hydrogenaudio Forum Rules - No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service
[USELESS] Is Ogg Vorbis aoTuV b2 Q=4,44, transparent for you? |
  Jul 11 2004, 20:18
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Banned Posts: 27 Joined: 8-July 04 Member No.: 15155  |
Is Ogg Vorbis aoTuV b2 Q=4,44 transparent for you?
I mean YOUR music, not special killer samples. If it is not transparent, please tell me in what? |
 |
 
|
 |
|
Jul 11 2004, 21:32
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Super Moderator Posts: 1813 Joined: 24-July 02 Member No.: 2776 |
8 people have voted so far, which would mean that 8 people are actually using 4.44 or have at least verified their claims in various blind tests. Now, how realistic is that? I rather smell eight TOS#8 violations.
-------------------- foobar2000.audiohq.de
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2004, 21:35
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 3474 Joined: 7-November 01 From: Strasbourg (France) Member No.: 420 |
QUOTE (Frank_Bicking @ Jul 11 2004, 09:32 PM) I rather smell eight TOS#8 violations.  Seven. I've voted for "never transparent". The results of a listening test including Megamix on "usual" samples will follow in the next hours. 
|
|
|
|
Celsus [USELESS] Is Ogg Vorbis aoTuV b2 Q=4,44 Jul 11 2004, 20:18
Latexxx Why q 4,44? Jul 11 2004, 20:20
Celsus QUOTE (Latexxx @ Jul 11 2004, 10:20 PM)Why q ... Jul 11 2004, 20:23 Dibrom QUOTE (Celsus @ Jul 11 2004, 11:23 AM)QUOTE (... Jul 11 2004, 20:56 Celsus QUOTE (Dibrom @ Jul 11 2004, 10:56 PM)QUOTE (... Jul 11 2004, 21:02 DreamTactix291 I suppose aoTuV b2 at 4.44 would be transparent en... Jul 11 2004, 21:06 analogy For portable use, I'll encode at Q0 to save sp... Jul 11 2004, 21:08 Latexxx What bitrate does q 4,44 represent? Jul 11 2004, 21:14 DreamTactix291 Nominal of 142.1kbps. Jul 11 2004, 21:15 Celsus QUOTE (DreamTactix291 @ Jul 11 2004, 11:15 PM... Jul 11 2004, 21:17 Latexxx Why q 4.44 why not 4, 4.5 or 5? Jul 11 2004, 21:21 Celsus QUOTE (Latexxx @ Jul 11 2004, 11:21 PM)Why q ... Jul 11 2004, 21:28 Celsus QUOTE (Frank_Bicking @ Jul 11 2004, 11:32 PM)... Jul 11 2004, 21:56 guruboolez QUOTE (Celsus @ Jul 11 2004, 09:56 PM)QUOTE (... Jul 11 2004, 22:00 Celsus QUOTE (guruboolez @ Jul 12 2004, 12:00 AM)QUO... Jul 11 2004, 22:06 guruboolez QUOTE (Celsus @ Jul 11 2004, 10:06 PM)but ... Jul 11 2004, 22:15 DeeZi A few preecho optimations should be done.
Like in ... Jul 11 2004, 21:33 eagleray 4.99 would make more sense to me as that is the cu... Jul 11 2004, 22:11 Celsus Ok, so we advice all people to do ABX But poll is... Jul 11 2004, 22:30 guruboolez QUOTE (Celsus @ Jul 11 2004, 10:30 PM)Ok, so ... Jul 11 2004, 22:34 Celsus I think that problem is on reader side. If poll is... Jul 11 2004, 22:51 indybrett QUOTE (Celsus @ Jul 11 2004, 04:51 PM)I don... Jul 11 2004, 23:26 Atlantis QUOTE (indybrett @ Jul 12 2004, 12:26 AM)QUOT... Jul 12 2004, 07:54 Celsus Well, everyone here has right to have his opinion.... Jul 12 2004, 09:25 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 18:53 |
