320kbit: Blade vs. Lame, 44.1Khz and 48.0Khz Sampling |
  |
320kbit: Blade vs. Lame, 44.1Khz and 48.0Khz Sampling |
 Aug 29 2004, 06:21
Post
#26
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 761 Joined: 29-September 01 Member No.: 40  |
Looking at the Frequency spectrum won't tell you a thing about quality as you cannot see problems of the psychoacustic model you might hear.
Lossy compression is always about sounding as the CD not looking as it! This post has been edited by Benjamin Lebsanft: Aug 29 2004, 06:22 |
 |
 
|
|
Aug 29 2004, 06:55
Post
#27
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 9 Joined: 26-August 04 Member No.: 16544 |
QUOTE (Benjamin Lebsanft @ Aug 29 2004, 12:21 AM) Looking at the Frequency spectrum won't tell you a thing about quality as you cannot see problems of the psychoacustic model you might hear. Lossy compression is always about sounding as the CD not looking as it!  I see .... said the blind man  Roger that -
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 29 2004, 09:09
Post
#28
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 684 Joined: 15-December 01 From: Denmark Member No.: 655 |
looking at spectograms for quality determination is a usefull as playing back your jpegs as raw sound to hear the differences.
-------------------- Sven Bent - Denmark
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 09:16 |
