so when to work on new presets?, hold old is 3.90.3? 3 years? |
![]() ![]() |
so when to work on new presets?, hold old is 3.90.3? 3 years? |
Dec 19 2004, 14:17
Post
#26
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 723 Joined: 29-November 01 Member No.: 563 |
QUOTE (w00b3r @ Dec 17 2004, 06:28 PM) haha, there goes the purpose of ubernet (maybe).. they use alt-preset standard as if their life kinda depends on it you know.. so they are going to have to change the "uberstandard" and all that.. I know where that line came from. It's hilarious. Well, at least the dolts who thought it up tell people that it's *just what they think sounds best*.while we are at the topic of switches.. what is the best non-preset switch to use that will compare very well with cd quality, for the highest percentage of CD's? someone recommended this: -V 2 --vbr-new -q 0 --lowpass 19.7 --cwlimit 10.7 --scale 0.99 -b 96 --athaa-sensitivity 1 any other suggestions would be appreciated. =) btw im using 3.96.1 stable right now You see, the one thing which shows better than anything else how little these guys know about writing commandlines is the "--lowpass 19.7" Lame only lowpasses in increments of 0.5kHz, so telling it to lowpass at 19.7 kHz is nonsense. You ought to tell it to lowpass at 19.5kHz or 20kHz, to be certain that it's doing what it ought to be. |
|
|
|
Dec 19 2004, 15:18
Post
#27
|
|
![]() LAME developer Group: Developer Posts: 2950 Joined: 1-October 01 From: Nanterre, France Member No.: 138 |
I'd like to know where does this come from...
An interesting parameter is cwlimit, which simply does nothing since 3.94 |
|
|
|
Dec 19 2004, 20:41
Post
#28
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 423 Joined: 3-February 04 Member No.: 11743 |
Why does this thread exist? There's nothing here that is helping anybody.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 21:45 |