Any listening test Stereo vs Joint stereo in mp3? |
Any listening test Stereo vs Joint stereo in mp3? |
 Jan 14 2005, 14:46
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 92 Joined: 9-July 04 Member No.: 15216  |
Hi all,
in many discussions I read about mp3 via Lame encoder the result is that the best solution is joint stereo. I believe in that as the developers who I highly esteem say so. But is this statement supported also by more independent listening tests? Especially I would be interested in comparison between --preset standard (joint stereo) and dtto with stereo mode. Can the result in general depend also on the Lame version? From the tests I could read usually still the old good Lame 3.90.3 comes out as the winner. Cheers, Crazyman |
 |
 
|
 |
|
Aug 4 2006, 19:20
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 4-August 06 Member No.: 33635 |
hey
this is an old article against Joint Stereo: http://harmsy.freeuk.com/mostync/ I don't know, where's the truth. ? |
|
|
|
crazyman Any listening test Stereo vs Joint stereo in mp3? Jan 14 2005, 14:46
beto This makes no sense, since joint stereo is just a ... Jan 14 2005, 14:51
mithrandir QUOTE (beto @ Jan 14 2005, 08:51 AM)This make... Jan 14 2005, 16:38 Otto42 QUOTE (mithrandir @ Jan 14 2005, 09:38 AM)No,... Jan 14 2005, 16:50 dev0 QUOTE (mithrandir @ Jan 14 2005, 04:38 PM)No,... Jan 14 2005, 18:42 Mark7 QUOTE (dev0 @ Jan 14 2005, 09:42 AM)QUOTE (mi... Jan 14 2005, 19:04 mithrandir QUOTE (dev0 @ Jan 14 2005, 12:42 PM)QUOTE (mi... Jan 14 2005, 22:44 Jojo QUOTE (mithrandir @ Jan 14 2005, 01:44 PM)If ... Jan 15 2005, 01:49 Busemann QUOTE (Jojo @ Jan 14 2005, 04:49 PM)QUOTE (mi... Jan 15 2005, 01:55 Jojo QUOTE (Busemann @ Jan 14 2005, 04:55 PM)QUOTE... Jan 15 2005, 02:03 SirGrey >>No, joint stereo is lossy.
Wrong.
joint-st... Jan 14 2005, 16:48 SirGrey Addenium:
Lots of the confusion goes from Fhg.
The... Jan 14 2005, 16:53 Gray_Wolf This is incredible
Many people in present mome... Jan 14 2005, 17:10 crazyman QUOTE (Gray_Wolf @ Jan 14 2005, 08:10 AM)This... Jan 19 2005, 09:30 Busemann QUOTE (crazyman @ Jan 19 2005, 12:30 AM)Quite... Jan 19 2005, 11:44 crazyman QUOTE (Busemann @ Jan 19 2005, 02:44 AM)QUOTE... Jan 20 2005, 11:29 Jojo The bottom line is that Joint-Stereo used in LAME ... Jan 14 2005, 17:53 2Bdecided The stereo to joint stereo (i.e. L+R>M+S) trans... Jan 17 2005, 16:34 crazyman QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Jan 17 2005, 07:34 AM)The ... Jan 19 2005, 09:25 mithrandir QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Jan 17 2005, 10:34 AM)The ... Jan 20 2005, 05:52 MugFunky guh, why has this myth never been dispelled?
it s... Jan 20 2005, 06:29 DreamTactix291 QUOTE (MugFunky @ Jan 19 2005, 11:29 PM)guh, ... Jan 20 2005, 06:56 Gabriel The M/S stereo transform itself is lossless.
Howev... Jan 20 2005, 09:13 2Bdecided Talk about things coming back to bite you...
I... Jan 21 2005, 12:10 Gabriel Well, in your case intensity stereo is a good thin... Jan 21 2005, 13:55 Bogalvator QUOTE (Gabriel @ Jan 21 2005, 04:55 AM)Well, ... Jan 22 2005, 04:49 2Bdecided QUOTE (Gabriel @ Jan 21 2005, 12:55 PM)Well, ... Jan 24 2005, 17:00 Gabriel QUOTE but the broadcasters have reportedly asked f... Jan 24 2005, 20:41 Ossie Hi, I just want to check if the following staement... May 21 2005, 10:57 Pio2001 It all depends if the psychoacoustic model can han... May 21 2005, 13:01 Pio2001 Oh, that's not all, you'll have to force m... May 21 2005, 13:07 Garf QUOTE (mjkng2 @ Aug 4 2006, 20:20) hey
t... Aug 5 2006, 09:44 stephanV It's not against JS... it just says that an al... Aug 4 2006, 20:16 Pio2001 I've performed two joint stereo listening test... Aug 4 2006, 22:52 haregoo This sample is ABXable(16/16) even with -V 0 becau... Aug 5 2006, 03:57 Gabriel QUOTE (haregoo @ Aug 5 2006, 04:57) This ... Aug 5 2006, 08:48 haregoo QUOTE (Gabriel @ Aug 5 2006, 16:48) Regar... Aug 5 2006, 14:14 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 02:17 |
