same results?, quality and size |
  |
same results?, quality and size |
 Feb 10 2005, 05:32
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 10-February 05 Member No.: 19725  |
Hi guys, this might seem to be an odd question ( or maybe even a stupid one) but I just need to be sure, will there be any difference in terms of quality/size, when I encode the same CD track on let's say on a very low end machine like maybe a Cyrix 100 vs. let's say a Pentium Xeon?
|
 |
 
|
|
Feb 10 2005, 12:03
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 189 Joined: 9-July 02 Member No.: 2536 |
No. As long as you use the same software to encode of course.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 10 2005, 21:29
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 799 Joined: 12-September 03 Member No.: 8821 |
If encoder is optimized for using multimedia extensions like MMX, SSE, 3DNow, etc. and you'll use it on a CPU which doesn't support them, it can use native FPU operations for encoding. So, there may be some differences in resulting data, slower encoding speed, and few bytes smaller/bigger size, but they shouldn't affect quality.
This post has been edited by rutra80: Feb 10 2005, 21:33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 18:30 |
