LAME 4.0 alpha 13 CLI encoder for TESTING ONLY 20 |
LAME 4.0 alpha 13 CLI encoder for TESTING ONLY 20 |
 Feb 28 2005, 20:30
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 44 Joined: 9-January 02 Member No.: 963  |
I've notice something new on rarewares.
Just FYI, I'm doing some encoding now, only for testing purposes of course 
|
 |
 
|
 |
|
Feb 28 2005, 22:08
Post
#2
|
|
 xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
Some may recall that I posted alpha 12 a while back, and I've been updating this as Takehiro updated the CVS. As it's now gone to alpha 13, and therefore the old link is broken, I thought it better to hide it at the bottom of the mp3 page at Rarewares so that it was more readily available.
As Roberto has indicated, it wasn't intended to be announced, as such, it was just there for those who took the trouble to look. As stated many times before, this is NOT yet ready for user testing. Takehiro will ask for that when he's ready. It is just there for people to see what progress he's making and the direction it's going in. -------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2005, 14:07
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 22-February 05 Member No.: 20067 |
I tested this out last night and was suprised how quick it encoded an mp3. It was at least twice as fast as 3.90.3, possible more. Is it written with SSE CPU optimization code built it or it utilising a new compression engine?
The initial file output was much smaller but in comparison had a much lower bitrate for preset standard than 3.96.1. I'd like to know more info about this version so i know what to look out for. I'd like to start some hardcore testing 
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2005, 14:38
Post
#4
|
|
 Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 1336 Joined: 18-November 01 From: Celaya, Guanajuato Member No.: 478 |
QUOTE (OldSkoOL @ Mar 1 2005, 07:07 AM) I tested this out last night and was suprised how quick it encoded an mp3. It was at least twice as fast as 3.90.3, possible more. Is it written with SSE CPU optimization code built it or it utilising a new compression engine? The initial file output was much smaller but in comparison had a much lower bitrate for preset standard than 3.96.1. I'd like to know more info about this version so i know what to look out for. I'd like to start some hardcore testing  LAME 3.97 is already twice as fast as 3.90 in my computer. Might be useful in doing some testing, but I think we should concentrate on 3.97 until Takehiro gives us the "go!" sign. -------------------- I'm the one in the picture, sitting on a giant cabbage in Mexico, circa 1978.
Reseņas de Rock en Espaņol: www.estadogeneral.com |
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2005, 15:21
Post
#5
|
|
 Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81 |
QUOTE (AtaqueEG @ Mar 1 2005, 10:38 AM) Might be useful in doing some testing, but I think we should concentrate on 3.97 until Takehiro gives us the "go!" sign. Right. I remember Takehiro was mildly annoyed last time people jumped the gun and started madly speculating about lame 4. I hope people without any clue about LAME development won't go around announcing these pre-testing versions anymore. -------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2005, 21:09
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1361 Joined: 25-November 02 Member No.: 3873 |
QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 1 2005, 06:21 AM) QUOTE (AtaqueEG @ Mar 1 2005, 10:38 AM) Might be useful in doing some testing, but I think we should concentrate on 3.97 until Takehiro gives us the "go!" sign. Right. I remember Takehiro was mildly annoyed last time people jumped the gun and started madly speculating about lame 4. I hope people without any clue about LAME development won't go around announcing these pre-testing versions anymore. there should be a password protection for the archive...something like "FOR TESTING ONLY" would be good
-------------------- --alt-presets are there for a reason! These other switches DO NOT work better than it, trust me on this.
LAME + Joint Stereo doesn't destroy 'Stereo' |
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2005, 21:13
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 22-February 05 Member No.: 20067 |
Thing is there seems to be no documentation or build notes/change logs surrounding this build. Which makes it quite hard to test and what to look our for.
For a start i dont even know who built it. And i was suprised to see it leap frog alpha 7 build and thread. 
|
|
|
|
lithoc LAME 4.0 alpha 13 CLI encoder for TESTING ONLY 20 Feb 28 2005, 20:30
earphiler i can't find this on the rarewares. strange? Feb 28 2005, 21:40
rjamorim QUOTE (earphiler @ Feb 28 2005, 05:40 PM)i ca... Feb 28 2005, 21:56 Lyx QUOTE (rjamorim @ Feb 28 2005, 10:56 PM)QUOTE... Feb 28 2005, 22:07 earphiler sorry about that/ i never wouldn't looked towa... Feb 28 2005, 22:03 rjamorim QUOTE (OldSkoOL @ Mar 1 2005, 05:13 PM)Thing ... Mar 1 2005, 21:17 OldSkoOL QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 1 2005, 02:17 PM)Move o... Mar 1 2005, 21:22 robert QUOTE (OldSkoOL @ Mar 1 2005, 09:22 PM)QUOTE ... Mar 1 2005, 22:12 westgroveg I tested 4.0 against 3.90.3 & 3.96.1 on only 3... Mar 1 2005, 14:13 john33 I can't believe the fuss this has generated... Mar 1 2005, 22:17 uart QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 1 2005, 01:17 PM)I can... Mar 15 2005, 15:44 BoNeLeSS Move Along, citizens. There's Nothing to See H... Mar 1 2005, 23:05 henkersmahlzeit QUOTE (BoNeLeSS @ Mar 1 2005, 02:05 PM)Move A... Mar 2 2005, 00:23 IGOR][X QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 1 2005, 10:17 PM)I can... Mar 10 2005, 00:28 john33 Before there are any other comments, this is there... Mar 15 2005, 16:34 Lyx QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 15 2005, 05:34 PM)LAME 4.... Mar 16 2005, 15:54 jaybeee QUOTE (Lyx @ Mar 16 2005, 02:54 PM)QUOTE (joh... Mar 16 2005, 17:05 kindofblue QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 15 2005, 07:34 AM)LAME 4.... Mar 16 2005, 05:04 OldSkoOL At first its amazingly fast but then the fun ends. Mar 16 2005, 15:34 manuelator i tried the lame 4 alpha 14, and it's really f... Aug 18 2005, 01:37 Roobar I decided to use Lame4.0a14 to re-rip and encode G... Apr 10 2006, 00:16 skelly831 QUOTE (Roobar @ Apr 9 2006, 04:16 PM) I d... Apr 10 2006, 00:27 Roobar QUOTE (skelly831 @ Apr 10 2006, 09:27 AM)... Apr 10 2006, 05:45 odyssey Does anyone have en idea of when lame 4.0 MIGHT be... Apr 10 2006, 13:18 DigitalDictator QUOTE Not entirely happy with the 3.97b2 encode us... Apr 10 2006, 13:37 AtaqueEG QUOTE (DigitalDictator @ Apr 10 2006, 06... Apr 10 2006, 13:49 Roobar QUOTE (DigitalDictator @ Apr 10 2006, 10... Apr 10 2006, 14:57 guruboolez It would be nice to have more details. You said th... Apr 10 2006, 13:50 dev0 It's not a matter of being mean, but of provin... Apr 10 2006, 15:15 woody_woodward QUOTE (dev0 @ Apr 10 2006, 06:15 AM) It... Apr 10 2006, 17:30 Jebus QUOTE (woody_woodward @ Apr 10 2006, 08:3... Apr 10 2006, 17:59 woody_woodward QUOTE (Jebus @ Apr 10 2006, 08:59 AM) QUO... Apr 10 2006, 20:13 AtaqueEG QUOTE (woody_woodward @ Apr 10 2006, 01:1... Apr 11 2006, 04:15 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th May 2013 - 04:04 |
