LAME 4.0 alpha 13 CLI encoder for TESTING ONLY 20 |
LAME 4.0 alpha 13 CLI encoder for TESTING ONLY 20 |
 Feb 28 2005, 20:30
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 44 Joined: 9-January 02 Member No.: 963  |
I've notice something new on rarewares.
Just FYI, I'm doing some encoding now, only for testing purposes of course 
|
 |
 
|
 |
|
Mar 15 2005, 16:34
Post
#2
|
|
 xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3713 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
Before there are any other comments, this is there for your own appreciation only. Neither Takehiro, nor any of the other lame-devs, is directly interested in any testing you may do at this time.
There is no Change Log, or any other relevant documentation. LAME 4.0 is virtually a total rewrite, so little if any of the work done on 3.9x will go forward. So, have some fun with it, but don't even consider using it for any other purpose.
-------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
|
Mar 16 2005, 15:54
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 3353 Joined: 6-July 03 From: Sachsen (DE) Member No.: 7609 |
QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 15 2005, 05:34 PM) LAME 4.0 is virtually a total rewrite, so little if any of the work done on 3.9x will go forward. If thats the case, then i wonder: Looking at the promising test-results of the upcoming 3.97, wouldn't it make sense - after 3.97 got finished - to say "okay, thats it - the 3.9x series reached its limits - now lets focus all efforts on lame4" ? I mean, if 3.97 turns out as good as it seems, then we would have a tuned, stable and good 3.97 - a perfect point to abandon the 3.9x series (except of possible bugfixes) and focus all energy on lame4 because all work on the 3.9x series cannot be "ported" to the future of lame(4). I'm kinda curious on whats the strategy of the lame-devs on this matter. - Lyx This post has been edited by Lyx: Mar 16 2005, 15:54 -------------------- I am arrogant and I can afford it because I deliver.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 16 2005, 17:05
Post
#4
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 410 Joined: 20-October 04 From: UK Member No.: 17750 |
QUOTE (Lyx @ Mar 16 2005, 02:54 PM) QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 15 2005, 05:34 PM) LAME 4.0 is virtually a total rewrite, so little if any of the work done on 3.9x will go forward. If thats the case, then i wonder: Looking at the promising test-results of the upcoming 3.97, wouldn't it make sense - after 3.97 got finished - to say "okay, thats it - the 3.9x series reached its limits - now lets focus all efforts on lame4" ? I mean, if 3.97 turns out as good as it seems, then we would have a tuned, stable and good 3.97 - a perfect point to abandon the 3.9x series (except of possible bugfixes) and focus all energy on lame4 because all work on the 3.9x series cannot be "ported" to the future of lame(4). I'm kinda curious on whats the strategy of the lame-devs on this matter. - Lyx  Lyx - see this thread. I asked the very same thing. -------------------- http://www.health4ni.com/
|
|
|
|
lithoc LAME 4.0 alpha 13 CLI encoder for TESTING ONLY 20 Feb 28 2005, 20:30
earphiler i can't find this on the rarewares. strange? Feb 28 2005, 21:40
rjamorim QUOTE (earphiler @ Feb 28 2005, 05:40 PM)i ca... Feb 28 2005, 21:56 Lyx QUOTE (rjamorim @ Feb 28 2005, 10:56 PM)QUOTE... Feb 28 2005, 22:07 earphiler sorry about that/ i never wouldn't looked towa... Feb 28 2005, 22:03 john33 Some may recall that I posted alpha 12 a while bac... Feb 28 2005, 22:08 OldSkoOL I tested this out last night and was suprised how ... Mar 1 2005, 14:07 AtaqueEG QUOTE (OldSkoOL @ Mar 1 2005, 07:07 AM)I test... Mar 1 2005, 14:38 rjamorim QUOTE (AtaqueEG @ Mar 1 2005, 10:38 AM)Might ... Mar 1 2005, 15:21 Jojo QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 1 2005, 06:21 AM)QUOTE ... Mar 1 2005, 21:09 OldSkoOL Thing is there seems to be no documentation or bui... Mar 1 2005, 21:13 rjamorim QUOTE (OldSkoOL @ Mar 1 2005, 05:13 PM)Thing ... Mar 1 2005, 21:17 OldSkoOL QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 1 2005, 02:17 PM)Move o... Mar 1 2005, 21:22 robert QUOTE (OldSkoOL @ Mar 1 2005, 09:22 PM)QUOTE ... Mar 1 2005, 22:12 westgroveg I tested 4.0 against 3.90.3 & 3.96.1 on only 3... Mar 1 2005, 14:13 john33 I can't believe the fuss this has generated... Mar 1 2005, 22:17 uart QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 1 2005, 01:17 PM)I can... Mar 15 2005, 15:44 BoNeLeSS Move Along, citizens. There's Nothing to See H... Mar 1 2005, 23:05 henkersmahlzeit QUOTE (BoNeLeSS @ Mar 1 2005, 02:05 PM)Move A... Mar 2 2005, 00:23 IGOR][X QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 1 2005, 10:17 PM)I can... Mar 10 2005, 00:28 kindofblue QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 15 2005, 07:34 AM)LAME 4.... Mar 16 2005, 05:04 OldSkoOL At first its amazingly fast but then the fun ends. Mar 16 2005, 15:34 manuelator i tried the lame 4 alpha 14, and it's really f... Aug 18 2005, 01:37 Roobar I decided to use Lame4.0a14 to re-rip and encode G... Apr 10 2006, 00:16 skelly831 QUOTE (Roobar @ Apr 9 2006, 04:16 PM) I d... Apr 10 2006, 00:27 Roobar QUOTE (skelly831 @ Apr 10 2006, 09:27 AM)... Apr 10 2006, 05:45 odyssey Does anyone have en idea of when lame 4.0 MIGHT be... Apr 10 2006, 13:18 DigitalDictator QUOTE Not entirely happy with the 3.97b2 encode us... Apr 10 2006, 13:37 AtaqueEG QUOTE (DigitalDictator @ Apr 10 2006, 06... Apr 10 2006, 13:49 Roobar QUOTE (DigitalDictator @ Apr 10 2006, 10... Apr 10 2006, 14:57 guruboolez It would be nice to have more details. You said th... Apr 10 2006, 13:50 dev0 It's not a matter of being mean, but of provin... Apr 10 2006, 15:15 woody_woodward QUOTE (dev0 @ Apr 10 2006, 06:15 AM) It... Apr 10 2006, 17:30 Jebus QUOTE (woody_woodward @ Apr 10 2006, 08:3... Apr 10 2006, 17:59 woody_woodward QUOTE (Jebus @ Apr 10 2006, 08:59 AM) QUO... Apr 10 2006, 20:13 AtaqueEG QUOTE (woody_woodward @ Apr 10 2006, 01:1... Apr 11 2006, 04:15 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 05:55 |
