Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Evidence that LAME is the best mp3 encoder (Read 3637 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Evidence that LAME is the best mp3 encoder

I know LAME is the best, but I'm after some evidence (listening tests/results etc) that I can reference for some work I'm doing. 

I know about Roberto's MP3 at 128kbps public listening test and 64kbps public listening test of course.  But I can't seem to find any others that compares LAME with Blade, FhG etc.  I know the aforementioned two tests are evidence enough, but I just wondered if there was anymore? I expect these tests to have taken place quite a while ago, so maybe that's why it's harder to locate them?

This evidence is simply gonna be used to explain why LAME is the best.

Thanks

Evidence that LAME is the best mp3 encoder

Reply #2 –
Quote
On Rarewares you have:

*
http://www.rjamorim.com/test/128extension/results.html
There you have Lame and Blade

*
http://www.rjamorim.com/test/mp3-128/presentation.html
mp3 @ 128

On ff123.net you have:

*
http://ff123.net/dogies/dogies_plots.html
There you have Lame against Xing

*
http://ff123.net/128test/interim.html
There you have Lame against Xing
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Unfortunately, I can't access rarewares from my work PC  . Gets blocked cos the blocking software thinks it's a Music download site!!

Anyway, the second ref refers to the [a href="http://www.rjamorim.com/test/mp3-128/results.html]results[/url] section that I posted above.

Thanks for the other two.

That'll do.