3.90.3 versus 3.96.1, ...it's not what it seems |
3.90.3 versus 3.96.1, ...it's not what it seems |
Mar 6 2005, 05:05
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 168 Joined: 27-February 05 Member No.: 20208 |
Take the two LAME versions: 3.90.3 and 3.96.1
Now I'm not going to ask which has been more tested -- the answer is simple. However, I would like to know why you personally choose 3.90.3 or 3.96.1 To me, it makes no difference but I grabbed 3.96.1, I'm too lazy to switch back, no problems here, I'm not too paranoid, and newer just sounds cooler (not to say its better). Others? I know this thread sounds rather peculiar |
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 7 2005, 20:48
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4887 Joined: 12-August 04 From: Exeter, UK Member No.: 16217 |
QUOTE (Lyx @ Mar 7 2005, 07:27 PM) Polls - suprisingly - only show whats popular. It doesn't tell you anything about the reasons why people did choose something nor does it tell you which one overally is better. Polls are just a popularity-meter... not more, not less. I basically agree - but what I'm saying is, rightly or wrongly, if the majority of the members of this forum are using 3.96.1 how we can credibly tell new members that 3.90.3 is the codec we'd recommend? This forum is its members, and should reflect their choices (whether they are right or wrong). If I were asked personally what version someone should use I would say 3.96.1, because that's what I use, and I feel that I have made an informed decision in choosing my encoder. Someone may say, quite rightly, that I am not as informed as the senior members of this forum. However, when the majority of the members say the same thing, that person can't say that we are all imbeciles and voting against the ideals of Hydrogen Audio... we are Hydrogen Audio. Edit: I am very aware that there have been 1849 views on this thread, and only 38 replies. A formal poll, in contradiction to the minor response so far, may reflect a huge majority for 3.90.3 - in which case I would gladly see it remain as the recommended codec (well, I could understand it anyway). I am also aware that 3.97 may not be too far off, and perhaps that version will be the one to finally take the throne. I just think we've raised some interesting questions here. This post has been edited by Synthetic Soul: Mar 7 2005, 21:03 -------------------- I'm on a horse.
|
|
|
|
Mar 8 2005, 01:31
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 266 Joined: 12-February 04 Member No.: 11970 |
Most of you will have noticed by now, but I'd like to invite you to place your votes in this preferred MP3 codec poll.
|
|
|
|
earphiler 3.90.3 versus 3.96.1 Mar 6 2005, 05:05
smz sounds like violating TOS#8, in this form... Mar 6 2005, 05:08
earphiler this isn't violation of #8 as stated --
8. A... Mar 6 2005, 05:14
smz QUOTE (earphiler @ Mar 6 2005, 05:05 AM)... a... Mar 6 2005, 05:23
rjamorim 3.96.1. 3.90.3 is effete. Mar 6 2005, 06:09
p0wder QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 10:09 PM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 08:24
boojum QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 09:09 PM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 08:50
AtaqueEG QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 11:09 PM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 21:15

Turing QUOTE (AtaqueEG @ Mar 6 2005, 10:15 PM)QUOTE ... Mar 6 2005, 21:48
music_man_mpc QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 09:09 PM)3.96.1... Mar 7 2005, 05:09
earphiler QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 6 2005, 12:09 AM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 06:14
linus 3.96.1 Mar 6 2005, 08:50
Teqnilogik 3.96.1 here because its faster and there is no qua... Mar 6 2005, 08:52
Acid Orange Juice QUOTE (Teqnilogik @ Mar 6 2005, 01:52 AM)3.96... Mar 6 2005, 21:27
VCSkier wow! im suprised. ive been using 3.90.3, and... Mar 6 2005, 11:01
Turing QUOTE (VCSkier @ Mar 6 2005, 12:01 PM)wow... Mar 6 2005, 11:42
Lyx QUOTE (VCSkier @ Mar 6 2005, 12:01 PM)wow... Mar 6 2005, 20:44
Turing QUOTE (Lyx @ Mar 6 2005, 09:44 PM)QUOTE (VCSk... Mar 6 2005, 21:36
LadFromDownUnder I switched from 3.90.3 to 3.96.1 for a bit, and no... Mar 6 2005, 11:46
Turing QUOTE (LadFromDownUnder @ Mar 6 2005, 12:46 P... Mar 6 2005, 11:48
LadFromDownUnder QUOTE (Turing @ Mar 6 2005, 11:48 PM)QUOTE (L... Mar 6 2005, 11:55
Jojo another vote for LAME 3.96.1 . Overall, lower bitr... Mar 6 2005, 20:26
Madrigal 3.96.1 -V1 --scale x.xxxx (as calculated by WaveGa... Mar 6 2005, 22:45
AtaqueEG QUOTE (Madrigal @ Mar 6 2005, 03:45 PM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 23:07
Megaman From http://dictionary.reference.com
effete ... Mar 6 2005, 23:06
earphiler I have to say I'm surprised. I would've th... Mar 7 2005, 00:45
WarChild Right now 3.97a7 it's faster and have noticed ... Mar 7 2005, 00:54
westgroveg Thanks to the wonderful dev0 we have a 3.90.3 vs. ... Mar 7 2005, 01:19
smz QUOTE (westgroveg @ Mar 7 2005, 01:19 AM)Than... Mar 7 2005, 01:25
timcupery QUOTE (westgroveg @ Mar 6 2[I)005, 07:19 PM] ... Mar 10 2005, 22:23
Jebus Been using 3.96.1 to encode about 50% of my librar... Mar 7 2005, 01:48
kindofblue Call me an unreconstructed, hidebound traditionali... Mar 7 2005, 02:50
AtaqueEG QUOTE (kindofblue @ Mar 6 2005, 07:50 PM)Call... Mar 7 2005, 04:02
DreamTactix291 I use 3.96.1 when I need to make mp3s because I ho... Mar 7 2005, 05:19
Synthetic Soul I use 3.96.1 -V5 --athaa-sensitivity 1, as per mus... Mar 7 2005, 09:54
Lev QUOTE I postulate that Roberto invokes a thesaurus... Mar 7 2005, 11:40
guruboolez QUOTE (Lev @ Mar 7 2005, 11:40 AM)This discus... Mar 7 2005, 11:47

rjamorim QUOTE (guruboolez @ Mar 7 2005, 07:47 AM)The ... Mar 7 2005, 16:22
Mac QUOTE (Lev @ Mar 7 2005, 10:40 AM)QUOTE I pos... Mar 9 2005, 19:50
VCSkier as said earlier, get a poll for perfered lame enco... Mar 7 2005, 17:50
Turing I understand why HA can only recommend 3.90.3 beca... Mar 7 2005, 17:56
freakngoat 3.96.1 -V1
For me, best compromise between qualit... Mar 7 2005, 20:15
Lyx Polls - suprisingly - only show whats popular. It ... Mar 7 2005, 20:27
Lyx QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Mar 7 2005, 09:48 PM)... Mar 8 2005, 14:50
kindofblue QUOTE (AtaqueEG @ Mar 6 2005, 07:02 PM)What w... Mar 8 2005, 03:22
guruboolez QUOTE (kindofblue @ Mar 8 2005, 03:22 AM)I... Mar 8 2005, 08:11
LoFiYo I use both for different purposes.
I understand t... Mar 8 2005, 06:31
Gabriel QUOTE But since HA is a separate entity from the L... Mar 8 2005, 09:20
Ollie QUOTE (Gabriel @ Mar 8 2005, 06:20 PM)But let... Mar 12 2005, 11:53
kindofblue QUOTE (guruboolez @ Mar 7 2005, 11:11 PM)QUOT... Mar 8 2005, 09:40
schonenberg I'm no programmer, but could Lame 3.90.3 be fu... Mar 8 2005, 13:30
Gabriel QUOTE I'm no programmer, but could Lame 3.90.3... Mar 8 2005, 13:33
Synthetic Soul @Lyx
Thanks for the comprehensive reply. I was u... Mar 8 2005, 15:15
john33 Well, just to upset everybody(!! ), I ten... Mar 8 2005, 15:22
OldSkoOL QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 8 2005, 08:22 AM)I tend t... Mar 8 2005, 17:45
schuberth One more vote for 3.90.3. Yes I'm interested i... Mar 8 2005, 21:29
larswes I use Lame 3.96.1 @ -V 4
For me, that's perfec... Mar 9 2005, 12:13
Yaztromo When I do use MP3. I use 3.90.3. Because I only ev... Mar 10 2005, 23:15
Jojo QUOTE (Yaztromo @ Mar 10 2005, 02:15 PM)When ... Mar 12 2005, 21:29
AtaqueEG QUOTE (Yaztromo @ Mar 10 2005, 04:15 PM)From ... Mar 13 2005, 05:44
miscellanea QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 8 2005, 11:22 PM)Well, ju... Mar 12 2005, 11:24
guruboolez QUOTE (miscellanea @ Mar 12 2005, 11:24 AM)Th... Mar 12 2005, 11:27
miscellanea QUOTE (guruboolez @ Mar 12 2005, 07:27 PM)Wha... Mar 12 2005, 13:10
guruboolez QUOTE (miscellanea @ Mar 12 2005, 01:10 PM)Ye... Mar 13 2005, 14:35
k.eight.a QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 09:09 PM)3.96.1... Apr 9 2005, 10:35
guruboolez QUOTE (k.eight.a @ Apr 9 2005, 10:35 AM)QUOTE... Apr 9 2005, 10:43

evereux QUOTE (guruboolez @ Apr 9 2005, 09:43 AM)QUOT... Apr 9 2005, 11:09

k.eight.a Unfortunately, when I was posting my first post to... Apr 9 2005, 11:46
LadFromDownUnder QUOTE (k.eight.a @ Apr 9 2005, 10:35 PM)QUOTE... Apr 9 2005, 12:25
VCSkier QUOTE (LadFromDownUnder @ Apr 9 2005, 07:25 A... Apr 9 2005, 13:45
odious malefactor ef·fete
Pronunciation: e-'fEt, i-
Function: a... Apr 9 2005, 11:51
dev0 3.97 will become the new recommended version once ... Apr 9 2005, 14:36![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 03:52 |