3.90.3 versus 3.96.1, ...it's not what it seems |
3.90.3 versus 3.96.1, ...it's not what it seems |
Mar 6 2005, 05:05
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 168 Joined: 27-February 05 Member No.: 20208 |
Take the two LAME versions: 3.90.3 and 3.96.1
Now I'm not going to ask which has been more tested -- the answer is simple. However, I would like to know why you personally choose 3.90.3 or 3.96.1 To me, it makes no difference but I grabbed 3.96.1, I'm too lazy to switch back, no problems here, I'm not too paranoid, and newer just sounds cooler (not to say its better). Others? I know this thread sounds rather peculiar |
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 8 2005, 03:22
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 175 Joined: 16-January 03 Member No.: 4600 |
QUOTE (AtaqueEG @ Mar 6 2005, 07:02 PM) What will stop you from being a "traditionalist" then? Sorry, I meant to say I'm being conservative in my choice of lame version, at least for now. I've actually been thinking of switching to 3.96.1 when I came across some posts here saying it had a few problems with highly tonal music. Yes, I know that most people can't tell between 3.96.1 and 3.90.3 in most cases, but then about the same time excitement began bubbling over hereabouts with testing of the 3.97 alphas (not to mention the news about work being done on LAME 4). I gathered from the alpha testing thread that 3.97 looks quite promising and even trumps 3.96.1 in some cases (and 3.90.3 IIRC), so I've decided to wait for 3.97 instead. Actually, I can't wait to try it out, so I guess I'm not as hidebound as my post implied after all, because I do want LAME to get even better. QUOTE (AtaqueEG @ Mar 6 2005, 07:02 PM) 3.97 won't be tested as much as 3.90.2 was. At some point, as many of us did, you will have to take a leap of faith. It looks like many have indeed. I seem to be the only one who voted for the recommended version so far. cheers This post has been edited by kindofblue: Mar 8 2005, 03:24 -------------------- WavPack 4.31 / LAME 3.98 alpha 3 -V9 -vbr-new
|
|
|
|
earphiler 3.90.3 versus 3.96.1 Mar 6 2005, 05:05
smz sounds like violating TOS#8, in this form... Mar 6 2005, 05:08
earphiler this isn't violation of #8 as stated --
8. A... Mar 6 2005, 05:14
smz QUOTE (earphiler @ Mar 6 2005, 05:05 AM)... a... Mar 6 2005, 05:23
rjamorim 3.96.1. 3.90.3 is effete. Mar 6 2005, 06:09
p0wder QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 10:09 PM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 08:24
boojum QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 09:09 PM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 08:50
AtaqueEG QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 11:09 PM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 21:15

Turing QUOTE (AtaqueEG @ Mar 6 2005, 10:15 PM)QUOTE ... Mar 6 2005, 21:48
music_man_mpc QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 09:09 PM)3.96.1... Mar 7 2005, 05:09
earphiler QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 6 2005, 12:09 AM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 06:14
linus 3.96.1 Mar 6 2005, 08:50
Teqnilogik 3.96.1 here because its faster and there is no qua... Mar 6 2005, 08:52
Acid Orange Juice QUOTE (Teqnilogik @ Mar 6 2005, 01:52 AM)3.96... Mar 6 2005, 21:27
VCSkier wow! im suprised. ive been using 3.90.3, and... Mar 6 2005, 11:01
Turing QUOTE (VCSkier @ Mar 6 2005, 12:01 PM)wow... Mar 6 2005, 11:42
Lyx QUOTE (VCSkier @ Mar 6 2005, 12:01 PM)wow... Mar 6 2005, 20:44
Turing QUOTE (Lyx @ Mar 6 2005, 09:44 PM)QUOTE (VCSk... Mar 6 2005, 21:36
LadFromDownUnder I switched from 3.90.3 to 3.96.1 for a bit, and no... Mar 6 2005, 11:46
Turing QUOTE (LadFromDownUnder @ Mar 6 2005, 12:46 P... Mar 6 2005, 11:48
LadFromDownUnder QUOTE (Turing @ Mar 6 2005, 11:48 PM)QUOTE (L... Mar 6 2005, 11:55
Jojo another vote for LAME 3.96.1 . Overall, lower bitr... Mar 6 2005, 20:26
Madrigal 3.96.1 -V1 --scale x.xxxx (as calculated by WaveGa... Mar 6 2005, 22:45
AtaqueEG QUOTE (Madrigal @ Mar 6 2005, 03:45 PM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 23:07
Megaman From http://dictionary.reference.com
effete ... Mar 6 2005, 23:06
earphiler I have to say I'm surprised. I would've th... Mar 7 2005, 00:45
WarChild Right now 3.97a7 it's faster and have noticed ... Mar 7 2005, 00:54
westgroveg Thanks to the wonderful dev0 we have a 3.90.3 vs. ... Mar 7 2005, 01:19
smz QUOTE (westgroveg @ Mar 7 2005, 01:19 AM)Than... Mar 7 2005, 01:25
timcupery QUOTE (westgroveg @ Mar 6 2[I)005, 07:19 PM] ... Mar 10 2005, 22:23
Jebus Been using 3.96.1 to encode about 50% of my librar... Mar 7 2005, 01:48
kindofblue Call me an unreconstructed, hidebound traditionali... Mar 7 2005, 02:50
AtaqueEG QUOTE (kindofblue @ Mar 6 2005, 07:50 PM)Call... Mar 7 2005, 04:02
DreamTactix291 I use 3.96.1 when I need to make mp3s because I ho... Mar 7 2005, 05:19
Synthetic Soul I use 3.96.1 -V5 --athaa-sensitivity 1, as per mus... Mar 7 2005, 09:54
Lev QUOTE I postulate that Roberto invokes a thesaurus... Mar 7 2005, 11:40
guruboolez QUOTE (Lev @ Mar 7 2005, 11:40 AM)This discus... Mar 7 2005, 11:47

rjamorim QUOTE (guruboolez @ Mar 7 2005, 07:47 AM)The ... Mar 7 2005, 16:22
Mac QUOTE (Lev @ Mar 7 2005, 10:40 AM)QUOTE I pos... Mar 9 2005, 19:50
VCSkier as said earlier, get a poll for perfered lame enco... Mar 7 2005, 17:50
Turing I understand why HA can only recommend 3.90.3 beca... Mar 7 2005, 17:56
freakngoat 3.96.1 -V1
For me, best compromise between qualit... Mar 7 2005, 20:15
Lyx Polls - suprisingly - only show whats popular. It ... Mar 7 2005, 20:27
Synthetic Soul QUOTE (Lyx @ Mar 7 2005, 07:27 PM)Polls - sup... Mar 7 2005, 20:48
Polar Most of you will have noticed by now, but I'd ... Mar 8 2005, 01:31
Lyx QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Mar 7 2005, 09:48 PM)... Mar 8 2005, 14:50
guruboolez QUOTE (kindofblue @ Mar 8 2005, 03:22 AM)I... Mar 8 2005, 08:11
LoFiYo I use both for different purposes.
I understand t... Mar 8 2005, 06:31
Gabriel QUOTE But since HA is a separate entity from the L... Mar 8 2005, 09:20
Ollie QUOTE (Gabriel @ Mar 8 2005, 06:20 PM)But let... Mar 12 2005, 11:53
kindofblue QUOTE (guruboolez @ Mar 7 2005, 11:11 PM)QUOT... Mar 8 2005, 09:40
schonenberg I'm no programmer, but could Lame 3.90.3 be fu... Mar 8 2005, 13:30
Gabriel QUOTE I'm no programmer, but could Lame 3.90.3... Mar 8 2005, 13:33
Synthetic Soul @Lyx
Thanks for the comprehensive reply. I was u... Mar 8 2005, 15:15
john33 Well, just to upset everybody(!! ), I ten... Mar 8 2005, 15:22
OldSkoOL QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 8 2005, 08:22 AM)I tend t... Mar 8 2005, 17:45
schuberth One more vote for 3.90.3. Yes I'm interested i... Mar 8 2005, 21:29
larswes I use Lame 3.96.1 @ -V 4
For me, that's perfec... Mar 9 2005, 12:13
Yaztromo When I do use MP3. I use 3.90.3. Because I only ev... Mar 10 2005, 23:15
Jojo QUOTE (Yaztromo @ Mar 10 2005, 02:15 PM)When ... Mar 12 2005, 21:29
AtaqueEG QUOTE (Yaztromo @ Mar 10 2005, 04:15 PM)From ... Mar 13 2005, 05:44
miscellanea QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 8 2005, 11:22 PM)Well, ju... Mar 12 2005, 11:24
guruboolez QUOTE (miscellanea @ Mar 12 2005, 11:24 AM)Th... Mar 12 2005, 11:27
miscellanea QUOTE (guruboolez @ Mar 12 2005, 07:27 PM)Wha... Mar 12 2005, 13:10
guruboolez QUOTE (miscellanea @ Mar 12 2005, 01:10 PM)Ye... Mar 13 2005, 14:35
k.eight.a QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 09:09 PM)3.96.1... Apr 9 2005, 10:35
guruboolez QUOTE (k.eight.a @ Apr 9 2005, 10:35 AM)QUOTE... Apr 9 2005, 10:43

evereux QUOTE (guruboolez @ Apr 9 2005, 09:43 AM)QUOT... Apr 9 2005, 11:09

k.eight.a Unfortunately, when I was posting my first post to... Apr 9 2005, 11:46
LadFromDownUnder QUOTE (k.eight.a @ Apr 9 2005, 10:35 PM)QUOTE... Apr 9 2005, 12:25
VCSkier QUOTE (LadFromDownUnder @ Apr 9 2005, 07:25 A... Apr 9 2005, 13:45
odious malefactor ef·fete
Pronunciation: e-'fEt, i-
Function: a... Apr 9 2005, 11:51
dev0 3.97 will become the new recommended version once ... Apr 9 2005, 14:36![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 18:07 |