3.90.3 versus 3.96.1, ...it's not what it seems |
3.90.3 versus 3.96.1, ...it's not what it seems |
Mar 6 2005, 05:05
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 168 Joined: 27-February 05 Member No.: 20208 |
Take the two LAME versions: 3.90.3 and 3.96.1
Now I'm not going to ask which has been more tested -- the answer is simple. However, I would like to know why you personally choose 3.90.3 or 3.96.1 To me, it makes no difference but I grabbed 3.96.1, I'm too lazy to switch back, no problems here, I'm not too paranoid, and newer just sounds cooler (not to say its better). Others? I know this thread sounds rather peculiar |
|
|
|
![]() |
Apr 9 2005, 10:35
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 434 Joined: 31-October 03 From: Europe, CZ Member No.: 9571 |
QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 09:09 PM) I'm sorry, but I still don't understand what do you mean by that... Do you mean the discussion about 3.96.1. vs. 3.90.3 ??? QUOTE (LadFromDownUnder @ Mar 6 2005, 02:46 AM) I switched from 3.90.3 to 3.96.1 for a bit, and noticed an easily discernable degradation when encoding some Strauss and some live Springsteen tracks (and I did ABX checks to confirm my suspicions). I've since switched back, I'm happy enough with the 3.90.3 encoding times. I used APS for both encoders. Can you post us your ABX results? I'm still considering switching over to 3.96.1 , later 3.97 stable... -------------------- Sorry for my poor English, I'm trying to get better... ;)
"The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled, was convincing the world he didn't exist." |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2005, 10:43
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 3474 Joined: 7-November 01 From: Strasbourg (France) Member No.: 420 |
|
|
|
|
Apr 9 2005, 11:46
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 434 Joined: 31-October 03 From: Europe, CZ Member No.: 9571 |
Unfortunately, when I was posting my first post to this thread I've read only the first page so there are my reactions...
I'm still using Lame 3.90.3 and considering to step further so I'm following similar discussions for a quite while... QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Mar 7 2005, 12:54 AM) I think this thread should be a poll, and should have some bearing on the HA recommended version. As it appears thus far that the majority are using 3.96.1, isn't it a little wrong to be recommending 3.90.3?! Very good point! QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Mar 7 2005, 12:54 AM) Whether it is less tested or not, if the majority of the community are using it then surely that is the implied recommendation of that community? A very good point again! QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Mar 7 2005, 12:54 AM) Unfortunately my support is of little benefit, compared to the those great souls who actually conduct the ABX tests which let me make my informed decisions, but it's a camaraderie thing. Unfortunately me too! QUOTE (VCSkier @ Mar 7 2005, 08:50 AM) I know a lot of work was put into 3.90.3, and it is undisputedly amazing what Dibrom and others have done with lame. I think that one of the reasons why are people sticking with 3.90.3 is that Dibrom, the founder of HydrogenAudio.org, was heavily contributing to the development while on the later not... QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Mar 7 2005, 11:48 AM) ...if the majority of the members of this forum are using 3.96.1 how we can credibly tell new members that 3.90.3 is the codec we'd recommend? This forum is its members, and should reflect their choices (whether they are right or wrong). We are Hydrogen Audio. Yeah! QUOTE (LoFiYo @ Mar 7 2005, 09:31 PM) Rather, I would love to see 3.90.3 overthrown by blind-testing 3.96.1 (or whatever the latest stable version) and found it better than 3.90.3, which is the hardest and the most time-consuming (but true to the original HA principles) option. Yes, exactly! QUOTE (guruboolez @ Mar 12 2005, 02:27 AM) I wonder how many people on this board, using lame 3.90.3 --preset standard, have really tested it. To be honest, I think the problem is that not so many HA members have sufficient equipment and hearing to contribute on those tests, anyway that's the reason why I'm not a part... QUOTE (guruboolez @ Apr 9 2005, 01:43 AM) QUOTE (k.eight.a @ Apr 9 2005, 10:35 AM) Do you mean the discussion about 3.96.1. vs. 3.90.3 ??? No, the encoder itself. 3.90.3 is a dead branch. Nobody's working on it. Thanks for explanation guruboolez! -------------------- Sorry for my poor English, I'm trying to get better... ;)
"The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled, was convincing the world he didn't exist." |
|
|
|
earphiler 3.90.3 versus 3.96.1 Mar 6 2005, 05:05
smz sounds like violating TOS#8, in this form... Mar 6 2005, 05:08
earphiler this isn't violation of #8 as stated --
8. A... Mar 6 2005, 05:14
smz QUOTE (earphiler @ Mar 6 2005, 05:05 AM)... a... Mar 6 2005, 05:23
rjamorim 3.96.1. 3.90.3 is effete. Mar 6 2005, 06:09
p0wder QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 10:09 PM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 08:24
boojum QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 09:09 PM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 08:50
AtaqueEG QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 11:09 PM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 21:15

Turing QUOTE (AtaqueEG @ Mar 6 2005, 10:15 PM)QUOTE ... Mar 6 2005, 21:48
music_man_mpc QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 09:09 PM)3.96.1... Mar 7 2005, 05:09
earphiler QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 6 2005, 12:09 AM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 06:14
linus 3.96.1 Mar 6 2005, 08:50
Teqnilogik 3.96.1 here because its faster and there is no qua... Mar 6 2005, 08:52
Acid Orange Juice QUOTE (Teqnilogik @ Mar 6 2005, 01:52 AM)3.96... Mar 6 2005, 21:27
VCSkier wow! im suprised. ive been using 3.90.3, and... Mar 6 2005, 11:01
Turing QUOTE (VCSkier @ Mar 6 2005, 12:01 PM)wow... Mar 6 2005, 11:42
Lyx QUOTE (VCSkier @ Mar 6 2005, 12:01 PM)wow... Mar 6 2005, 20:44
Turing QUOTE (Lyx @ Mar 6 2005, 09:44 PM)QUOTE (VCSk... Mar 6 2005, 21:36
LadFromDownUnder I switched from 3.90.3 to 3.96.1 for a bit, and no... Mar 6 2005, 11:46
Turing QUOTE (LadFromDownUnder @ Mar 6 2005, 12:46 P... Mar 6 2005, 11:48
LadFromDownUnder QUOTE (Turing @ Mar 6 2005, 11:48 PM)QUOTE (L... Mar 6 2005, 11:55
Jojo another vote for LAME 3.96.1 . Overall, lower bitr... Mar 6 2005, 20:26
Madrigal 3.96.1 -V1 --scale x.xxxx (as calculated by WaveGa... Mar 6 2005, 22:45
AtaqueEG QUOTE (Madrigal @ Mar 6 2005, 03:45 PM)3.96.1... Mar 6 2005, 23:07
Megaman From http://dictionary.reference.com
effete ... Mar 6 2005, 23:06
earphiler I have to say I'm surprised. I would've th... Mar 7 2005, 00:45
WarChild Right now 3.97a7 it's faster and have noticed ... Mar 7 2005, 00:54
westgroveg Thanks to the wonderful dev0 we have a 3.90.3 vs. ... Mar 7 2005, 01:19
smz QUOTE (westgroveg @ Mar 7 2005, 01:19 AM)Than... Mar 7 2005, 01:25
timcupery QUOTE (westgroveg @ Mar 6 2[I)005, 07:19 PM] ... Mar 10 2005, 22:23
Jebus Been using 3.96.1 to encode about 50% of my librar... Mar 7 2005, 01:48
kindofblue Call me an unreconstructed, hidebound traditionali... Mar 7 2005, 02:50
AtaqueEG QUOTE (kindofblue @ Mar 6 2005, 07:50 PM)Call... Mar 7 2005, 04:02
DreamTactix291 I use 3.96.1 when I need to make mp3s because I ho... Mar 7 2005, 05:19
Synthetic Soul I use 3.96.1 -V5 --athaa-sensitivity 1, as per mus... Mar 7 2005, 09:54
Lev QUOTE I postulate that Roberto invokes a thesaurus... Mar 7 2005, 11:40
guruboolez QUOTE (Lev @ Mar 7 2005, 11:40 AM)This discus... Mar 7 2005, 11:47

rjamorim QUOTE (guruboolez @ Mar 7 2005, 07:47 AM)The ... Mar 7 2005, 16:22
Mac QUOTE (Lev @ Mar 7 2005, 10:40 AM)QUOTE I pos... Mar 9 2005, 19:50
VCSkier as said earlier, get a poll for perfered lame enco... Mar 7 2005, 17:50
Turing I understand why HA can only recommend 3.90.3 beca... Mar 7 2005, 17:56
freakngoat 3.96.1 -V1
For me, best compromise between qualit... Mar 7 2005, 20:15
Lyx Polls - suprisingly - only show whats popular. It ... Mar 7 2005, 20:27
Synthetic Soul QUOTE (Lyx @ Mar 7 2005, 07:27 PM)Polls - sup... Mar 7 2005, 20:48
Polar Most of you will have noticed by now, but I'd ... Mar 8 2005, 01:31
Lyx QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Mar 7 2005, 09:48 PM)... Mar 8 2005, 14:50
kindofblue QUOTE (AtaqueEG @ Mar 6 2005, 07:02 PM)What w... Mar 8 2005, 03:22
guruboolez QUOTE (kindofblue @ Mar 8 2005, 03:22 AM)I... Mar 8 2005, 08:11
LoFiYo I use both for different purposes.
I understand t... Mar 8 2005, 06:31
Gabriel QUOTE But since HA is a separate entity from the L... Mar 8 2005, 09:20
Ollie QUOTE (Gabriel @ Mar 8 2005, 06:20 PM)But let... Mar 12 2005, 11:53
kindofblue QUOTE (guruboolez @ Mar 7 2005, 11:11 PM)QUOT... Mar 8 2005, 09:40
schonenberg I'm no programmer, but could Lame 3.90.3 be fu... Mar 8 2005, 13:30
Gabriel QUOTE I'm no programmer, but could Lame 3.90.3... Mar 8 2005, 13:33
Synthetic Soul @Lyx
Thanks for the comprehensive reply. I was u... Mar 8 2005, 15:15
john33 Well, just to upset everybody(!! ), I ten... Mar 8 2005, 15:22
OldSkoOL QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 8 2005, 08:22 AM)I tend t... Mar 8 2005, 17:45
schuberth One more vote for 3.90.3. Yes I'm interested i... Mar 8 2005, 21:29
larswes I use Lame 3.96.1 @ -V 4
For me, that's perfec... Mar 9 2005, 12:13
Yaztromo When I do use MP3. I use 3.90.3. Because I only ev... Mar 10 2005, 23:15
Jojo QUOTE (Yaztromo @ Mar 10 2005, 02:15 PM)When ... Mar 12 2005, 21:29
AtaqueEG QUOTE (Yaztromo @ Mar 10 2005, 04:15 PM)From ... Mar 13 2005, 05:44
miscellanea QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 8 2005, 11:22 PM)Well, ju... Mar 12 2005, 11:24
guruboolez QUOTE (miscellanea @ Mar 12 2005, 11:24 AM)Th... Mar 12 2005, 11:27
miscellanea QUOTE (guruboolez @ Mar 12 2005, 07:27 PM)Wha... Mar 12 2005, 13:10
guruboolez QUOTE (miscellanea @ Mar 12 2005, 01:10 PM)Ye... Mar 13 2005, 14:35

evereux QUOTE (guruboolez @ Apr 9 2005, 09:43 AM)QUOT... Apr 9 2005, 11:09
LadFromDownUnder QUOTE (k.eight.a @ Apr 9 2005, 10:35 PM)QUOTE... Apr 9 2005, 12:25
VCSkier QUOTE (LadFromDownUnder @ Apr 9 2005, 07:25 A... Apr 9 2005, 13:45
odious malefactor ef·fete
Pronunciation: e-'fEt, i-
Function: a... Apr 9 2005, 11:51
dev0 3.97 will become the new recommended version once ... Apr 9 2005, 14:36![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 18:33 |