IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3.90.3 versus 3.96.1, ...it's not what it seems
earphiler
post Mar 6 2005, 05:05
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 168
Joined: 27-February 05
Member No.: 20208



Take the two LAME versions: 3.90.3 and 3.96.1

Now I'm not going to ask which has been more tested -- the answer is simple. However, I would like to know why you personally choose 3.90.3 or 3.96.1

To me, it makes no difference but I grabbed 3.96.1, I'm too lazy to switch back, no problems here, I'm not too paranoid, and newer just sounds cooler (not to say its better).

Others? I know this thread sounds rather peculiar laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
k.eight.a
post Apr 9 2005, 10:35
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 434
Joined: 31-October 03
From: Europe, CZ
Member No.: 9571



QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 09:09 PM)
3.96.1. 3.90.3 is effete.
*

I'm sorry, but I still don't understand what do you mean by that...
Do you mean the discussion about 3.96.1. vs. 3.90.3 ???
QUOTE (LadFromDownUnder @ Mar 6 2005, 02:46 AM)
I switched from 3.90.3 to 3.96.1 for a bit, and noticed an easily discernable degradation when encoding some Strauss and some live Springsteen tracks (and I did ABX checks to confirm my suspicions).  I've since switched back, I'm happy enough with the 3.90.3 encoding times.  I used APS for both encoders.
*

Can you post us your ABX results?
I'm still considering switching over to 3.96.1 , later 3.97 stable...


--------------------
Sorry for my poor English, I'm trying to get better... ;)
"The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled, was convincing the world he didn't exist."
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LadFromDownUnder
post Apr 9 2005, 12:25
Post #3





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 90
Joined: 30-July 03
From: New Zealand
Member No.: 8083



QUOTE (k.eight.a @ Apr 9 2005, 10:35 PM)
QUOTE (LadFromDownUnder @ Mar 6 2005, 02:46 AM)
I switched from 3.90.3 to 3.96.1 for a bit, and noticed an easily discernable degradation when encoding some Strauss and some live Springsteen tracks (and I did ABX checks to confirm my suspicions).  I've since switched back, I'm happy enough with the 3.90.3 encoding times.  I used APS for both encoders.
*

Can you post us your ABX results?
I'm still considering switching over to 3.96.1 , later 3.97 stable...
*



Typically I discard ABX results after proving the point to myself (I used to keep them but realised I was never referring to them afterward), and this particular comparison is no exception. However, as the ABX results were for my ears, equipment, and environment, they would be unsuitable for another listener.

I am working with the 3.97 alpha releases, and am pleased with what I'm hearing.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VCSkier
post Apr 9 2005, 13:45
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 447
Joined: 26-January 05
From: LynchburgVA(US)
Member No.: 19325



QUOTE (LadFromDownUnder @ Apr 9 2005, 07:25 AM)
Typically I discard ABX results after proving the point to myself (I used to keep them but realised I was never referring to them afterward), and this particular comparison is no exception.  However, as the ABX results were for my ears, equipment, and environment, they would be unsuitable for another listener.

I am working with the 3.97 alpha releases, and am pleased with what I'm hearing.
*

would you consider giving the abx another shot and posting the new results. im curious. smile.gif


--------------------
a windows-free, linux user since 1/31/06.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- earphiler   3.90.3 versus 3.96.1   Mar 6 2005, 05:05
- - smz   sounds like violating TOS#8, in this form...   Mar 6 2005, 05:08
- - earphiler   this isn't violation of #8 as stated -- 8. A...   Mar 6 2005, 05:14
- - smz   QUOTE (earphiler @ Mar 6 2005, 05:05 AM)... a...   Mar 6 2005, 05:23
- - rjamorim   3.96.1. 3.90.3 is effete.   Mar 6 2005, 06:09
|- - p0wder   QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 10:09 PM)3.96.1...   Mar 6 2005, 08:24
|- - boojum   QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 09:09 PM)3.96.1...   Mar 6 2005, 08:50
|- - AtaqueEG   QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 11:09 PM)3.96.1...   Mar 6 2005, 21:15
||- - Turing   QUOTE (AtaqueEG @ Mar 6 2005, 10:15 PM)QUOTE ...   Mar 6 2005, 21:48
|- - music_man_mpc   QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 09:09 PM)3.96.1...   Mar 7 2005, 05:09
- - earphiler   QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 6 2005, 12:09 AM)3.96.1...   Mar 6 2005, 06:14
- - linus   3.96.1   Mar 6 2005, 08:50
- - Teqnilogik   3.96.1 here because its faster and there is no qua...   Mar 6 2005, 08:52
|- - Acid Orange Juice   QUOTE (Teqnilogik @ Mar 6 2005, 01:52 AM)3.96...   Mar 6 2005, 21:27
- - VCSkier   wow! im suprised. ive been using 3.90.3, and...   Mar 6 2005, 11:01
|- - Turing   QUOTE (VCSkier @ Mar 6 2005, 12:01 PM)wow...   Mar 6 2005, 11:42
|- - Lyx   QUOTE (VCSkier @ Mar 6 2005, 12:01 PM)wow...   Mar 6 2005, 20:44
|- - Turing   QUOTE (Lyx @ Mar 6 2005, 09:44 PM)QUOTE (VCSk...   Mar 6 2005, 21:36
- - LadFromDownUnder   I switched from 3.90.3 to 3.96.1 for a bit, and no...   Mar 6 2005, 11:46
|- - Turing   QUOTE (LadFromDownUnder @ Mar 6 2005, 12:46 P...   Mar 6 2005, 11:48
|- - LadFromDownUnder   QUOTE (Turing @ Mar 6 2005, 11:48 PM)QUOTE (L...   Mar 6 2005, 11:55
- - Jojo   another vote for LAME 3.96.1 . Overall, lower bitr...   Mar 6 2005, 20:26
- - Madrigal   3.96.1 -V1 --scale x.xxxx (as calculated by WaveGa...   Mar 6 2005, 22:45
|- - AtaqueEG   QUOTE (Madrigal @ Mar 6 2005, 03:45 PM)3.96.1...   Mar 6 2005, 23:07
- - Megaman   From http://dictionary.reference.com effete ...   Mar 6 2005, 23:06
- - earphiler   I have to say I'm surprised. I would've th...   Mar 7 2005, 00:45
- - WarChild   Right now 3.97a7 it's faster and have noticed ...   Mar 7 2005, 00:54
- - westgroveg   Thanks to the wonderful dev0 we have a 3.90.3 vs. ...   Mar 7 2005, 01:19
|- - smz   QUOTE (westgroveg @ Mar 7 2005, 01:19 AM)Than...   Mar 7 2005, 01:25
|- - timcupery   QUOTE (westgroveg @ Mar 6 2[I)005, 07:19 PM] ...   Mar 10 2005, 22:23
- - Jebus   Been using 3.96.1 to encode about 50% of my librar...   Mar 7 2005, 01:48
- - kindofblue   Call me an unreconstructed, hidebound traditionali...   Mar 7 2005, 02:50
|- - AtaqueEG   QUOTE (kindofblue @ Mar 6 2005, 07:50 PM)Call...   Mar 7 2005, 04:02
- - DreamTactix291   I use 3.96.1 when I need to make mp3s because I ho...   Mar 7 2005, 05:19
- - Synthetic Soul   I use 3.96.1 -V5 --athaa-sensitivity 1, as per mus...   Mar 7 2005, 09:54
- - Lev   QUOTE I postulate that Roberto invokes a thesaurus...   Mar 7 2005, 11:40
|- - guruboolez   QUOTE (Lev @ Mar 7 2005, 11:40 AM)This discus...   Mar 7 2005, 11:47
||- - rjamorim   QUOTE (guruboolez @ Mar 7 2005, 07:47 AM)The ...   Mar 7 2005, 16:22
|- - Mac   QUOTE (Lev @ Mar 7 2005, 10:40 AM)QUOTE I pos...   Mar 9 2005, 19:50
- - VCSkier   as said earlier, get a poll for perfered lame enco...   Mar 7 2005, 17:50
- - Turing   I understand why HA can only recommend 3.90.3 beca...   Mar 7 2005, 17:56
- - freakngoat   3.96.1 -V1 For me, best compromise between qualit...   Mar 7 2005, 20:15
- - Lyx   Polls - suprisingly - only show whats popular. It ...   Mar 7 2005, 20:27
- - Synthetic Soul   QUOTE (Lyx @ Mar 7 2005, 07:27 PM)Polls - sup...   Mar 7 2005, 20:48
|- - Polar   Most of you will have noticed by now, but I'd ...   Mar 8 2005, 01:31
|- - Lyx   QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Mar 7 2005, 09:48 PM)...   Mar 8 2005, 14:50
- - kindofblue   QUOTE (AtaqueEG @ Mar 6 2005, 07:02 PM)What w...   Mar 8 2005, 03:22
|- - guruboolez   QUOTE (kindofblue @ Mar 8 2005, 03:22 AM)I...   Mar 8 2005, 08:11
- - LoFiYo   I use both for different purposes. I understand t...   Mar 8 2005, 06:31
- - Gabriel   QUOTE But since HA is a separate entity from the L...   Mar 8 2005, 09:20
|- - Ollie   QUOTE (Gabriel @ Mar 8 2005, 06:20 PM)But let...   Mar 12 2005, 11:53
- - kindofblue   QUOTE (guruboolez @ Mar 7 2005, 11:11 PM)QUOT...   Mar 8 2005, 09:40
- - schonenberg   I'm no programmer, but could Lame 3.90.3 be fu...   Mar 8 2005, 13:30
- - Gabriel   QUOTE I'm no programmer, but could Lame 3.90.3...   Mar 8 2005, 13:33
- - Synthetic Soul   @Lyx Thanks for the comprehensive reply. I was u...   Mar 8 2005, 15:15
- - john33   Well, just to upset everybody(!! ), I ten...   Mar 8 2005, 15:22
|- - OldSkoOL   QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 8 2005, 08:22 AM)I tend t...   Mar 8 2005, 17:45
- - schuberth   One more vote for 3.90.3. Yes I'm interested i...   Mar 8 2005, 21:29
|- - larswes   I use Lame 3.96.1 @ -V 4 For me, that's perfec...   Mar 9 2005, 12:13
- - Yaztromo   When I do use MP3. I use 3.90.3. Because I only ev...   Mar 10 2005, 23:15
|- - Jojo   QUOTE (Yaztromo @ Mar 10 2005, 02:15 PM)When ...   Mar 12 2005, 21:29
|- - AtaqueEG   QUOTE (Yaztromo @ Mar 10 2005, 04:15 PM)From ...   Mar 13 2005, 05:44
- - miscellanea   QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 8 2005, 11:22 PM)Well, ju...   Mar 12 2005, 11:24
|- - guruboolez   QUOTE (miscellanea @ Mar 12 2005, 11:24 AM)Th...   Mar 12 2005, 11:27
- - miscellanea   QUOTE (guruboolez @ Mar 12 2005, 07:27 PM)Wha...   Mar 12 2005, 13:10
|- - guruboolez   QUOTE (miscellanea @ Mar 12 2005, 01:10 PM)Ye...   Mar 13 2005, 14:35
- - k.eight.a   QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 5 2005, 09:09 PM)3.96.1...   Apr 9 2005, 10:35
|- - guruboolez   QUOTE (k.eight.a @ Apr 9 2005, 10:35 AM)QUOTE...   Apr 9 2005, 10:43
||- - evereux   QUOTE (guruboolez @ Apr 9 2005, 09:43 AM)QUOT...   Apr 9 2005, 11:09
||- - k.eight.a   Unfortunately, when I was posting my first post to...   Apr 9 2005, 11:46
|- - LadFromDownUnder   QUOTE (k.eight.a @ Apr 9 2005, 10:35 PM)QUOTE...   Apr 9 2005, 12:25
|- - VCSkier   QUOTE (LadFromDownUnder @ Apr 9 2005, 07:25 A...   Apr 9 2005, 13:45
- - odious malefactor   ef·fete Pronunciation: e-'fEt, i- Function: a...   Apr 9 2005, 11:51
- - dev0   3.97 will become the new recommended version once ...   Apr 9 2005, 14:36


Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th April 2014 - 00:45