Speex For Music: Send Your Comments. |
Speex For Music: Send Your Comments. |
Aug 30 2002, 00:04
Post
#1
|
|
|
Xiph.org Speex developer Group: Developer Posts: 431 Joined: 21-August 02 Member No.: 3134 |
In the last Speex version (0.8.0), I added a new 42.2 kbps wideband mode which I'd qualify as the first non-catastrophic mode for music. I'd like to have feedback on music quality using that mode, let's say on a scale between "You call that music?" and "Almost as good as MP3". To try that mode, use the --quality 10 option *without* using --vbr. The file needs to be sampled at 16 kHz. The idea of this mode is to be able to encode occasional music segments in a mostly-voice recording (e.g. Internet radio). So what are the opinions?
BTW, Speex source code is available here and there are Windows binaries on RareWares. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Aug 30 2002, 10:43
Post
#2
|
|
![]() xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
QUOTE (PatchWorKs @ Aug 30 2002, 09:42 AM) I noticed that a 22 KHz, mono source is really comprensible, even for music. Try to use Soundprobe's expander & normalization before compressing... the sound can benefit from them !!! I think if you compare an ogg created using '-q -1', downmix to mono and resample to 22050, you will get output at approx 16kbps which sounds somewhat better than the speex equivalent. At least it does to my ears!! -------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
jmvalin Speex For Music: Send Your Comments. Aug 30 2002, 00:04
PatchWorKs I noticed that a 22 KHz, mono source is really com... Aug 30 2002, 09:42
jmvalin QUOTE (john33 @ Aug 30 2002, 04:43 AM)I think... Aug 30 2002, 14:56
techno_check QUOTE (jmvalin @ Aug 30 2002, 04:34) In t... Oct 13 2012, 11:02![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 15:05 |