Same CD and different CUE files? |
![]() ![]() |
Same CD and different CUE files? |
Apr 5 2005, 22:11
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 18-June 03 Member No.: 7253 |
I rip my CDs with EAC and save them as an image. I do this always twice to verify the CRC, however, I realized that the CUE files are sometimes different. For the same CD i get ...
CODE TRACK 01 AUDIO INDEX 01 00:00:00 TRACK 02 AUDIO INDEX 00 02:59:49 INDEX 01 02:59:50 TRACK 03 AUDIO INDEX 00 05:22:04 INDEX 01 05:22:05 ... or only ... CODE TRACK 01 AUDIO INDEX 01 00:00:00 TRACK 02 AUDIO INDEX 01 02:59:50 TRACK 03 AUDIO INDEX 01 05:22:05 .. and sometimes I even have the same ISRC for two different tracks. Is this something I should worry about if I want to have an accurate copy of my CDs? And should I start to create the CUE files more than once to compare them? Thanks Kasper |
|
|
|
Apr 5 2005, 23:33
Post
#2
|
|
|
Burrrn developer Group: Developer Posts: 917 Joined: 25-November 01 From: Bratislava, Slovakia Member No.: 534 |
This is most likely related to the "Gap/Index retrieval method" selected. I had this problem too on my Lite-On. Method A or B would be sometimes off by 1 frame. Only method C works accurately with my drive. Also note that changing "Detection Accuracy" doesn't solve it, you have to rather find the correct detection method for your drive.
-------------------- Burrrn - http://www.burrrn.net/
MPEG Audio Collection - http://mac.sourceforge.net/ |
|
|
|
Apr 5 2005, 23:38
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 543 Joined: 19-March 04 From: Alberta, Canada Member No.: 12841 |
Aw hell... now I've gotta re-rip three hundred rare, and very scratched up discs.
I'm guessing that the cuesheets that plextools pro XL generates using a decent plextor drive *would* be accurate, because it'll be using the correct method. EAC is frickin' slow at reading the pregaps too... sometimes it takes about ten minutes, or even more. I usually have to try different methods until one works within the time frame that I have to live. |
|
|
|
Apr 5 2005, 23:44
Post
#4
|
|
|
Burrrn developer Group: Developer Posts: 917 Joined: 25-November 01 From: Bratislava, Slovakia Member No.: 534 |
Well, you should find the right method and stick with it. For example, on my drive, method A is the fastest but not accurate (less than a second per track), method B is painfully slow and also not accurate and finally method C is accurate and acceptable fast (below 2 seconds per track).
-------------------- Burrrn - http://www.burrrn.net/
MPEG Audio Collection - http://mac.sourceforge.net/ |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2005, 06:21
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 543 Joined: 19-March 04 From: Alberta, Canada Member No.: 12841 |
But... how do you actually know what is accurate?
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2005, 08:26
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2525 Joined: 25-July 02 From: South Korea Member No.: 2782 |
Pregaps shouldn't be as short as 1-frame.
-------------------- http://blacksun.ivyro.net/vorbis/vorbisfaq.htm
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2005, 20:37
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 543 Joined: 19-March 04 From: Alberta, Canada Member No.: 12841 |
Uhm... I'm not understanding kjoonlee... you you saying that if you see a 1-frame pregap, there is something wrong?
I find that when they exist at all, they are usually around 2 seconds, although I have seen all kinds of numbers. This post has been edited by Supacon: Apr 6 2005, 20:37 |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2005, 12:42
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 18-June 03 Member No.: 7253 |
Now I get with ...
Method A: CODE TRACK 03 AUDIO TITLE "Some Of Us" PERFORMER "Starsailor" ISRC GBAYE0301039 INDEX 01 05:22:05 CODE TRACK 03 AUDIO TITLE "Some Of Us" PERFORMER "Starsailor" ISRC GBAYE0301038 INDEX 01 05:22:05 (Track 02 has the ISRC GBAYE0301038) Method B: ... same as with method A. Method C: CODE TRACK 03 AUDIO TITLE "Some Of Us" PERFORMER "Starsailor" INDEX 01 05:22:05 Should I care about the ISRC? Method C does not detect it, and the indices are with all methods the same now ... Or should I buy a new drive before i start to rip the next 300 CDs? |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 21:58 |