Burrrn 1.13 released, new version of the Audio CD burner Options

[Gambit]

I wanted to have more changes in this version, but I've been busy with other things. And I couldn't/didn't want to wait any longer, so here it is. If nothing else, the annoying P4 bugfix is a good reason for the release.

Changes from 1.12:
- fixed problems running on fast P4 machines
- added an "Add" button
- fixed some bugs (sorry I can't remember, it's been too long )
- donations are now accepted

http://www.burrrn.net/

[tcgabor]

Thanks for pointing out these principles (TOS) to me to 'separate fact from fiction' :-)
However, I seriously think there is a very big difference between non-sense audiophile concerns and audible differences in sound (which I do believe exist!)...otherwise I think the guidelines are just fine and you have a point there...

Cheers

This post has been edited by tcgabor: Jun 27 2005, 19:43

[jaybeee]

If you could do some listening tests with different types of blank CDs and upload your results for all to see we'd be most grateful. If you actually hear a diff between different CDRs then that would be useful for all to know. However, I would be very surprised if you'll hear a difference.

[tcgabor]

If you could do some listening tests with different types of blank CDs and upload your results for all to see we'd be most grateful.  If you actually hear a diff between different CDRs then that would be useful for all to know.  However, I would be very surprised if you'll hear a difference.

Sorry pal, I don't really know what you mean, besides I'm not very good at stuff like that (analysing results and posting them). So, how can I post my results if what you hear can be utterly subjective, nobody can doubt that. And if I write down what I heard while listening to different kinds of media would provoke nothing but loud laughter from your part to say the least. It needs some explanation: I think and believe that what you actually hear is not what you measure with different test programs. That is why posting something that cannot be justified only experinced on a highly subjective basis is not what would seem a good enough evidence. What you mean maybe is to post my measured results which guarantee nothing about what you hear only what can be measured. For the sake of avoiding subjective off-the-forum-principles posts, I suggest that we take my note about choosing media and all a side-track which has nothing to do with the basic inspiration for my posting. If, however, I still have questions about Burrrn, I will continue to ask them here.

G

[Triza]

If you could do some listening tests with different types of blank CDs and upload your results for all to see we'd be most grateful.  If you actually hear a diff between different CDRs then that would be useful for all to know.  However, I would be very surprised if you'll hear a difference.

Sorry pal, I don't really know what you mean, besides I'm not very good at stuff like that (analysing results and posting them). So, how can I post my results if what you hear can be utterly subjective, nobody can doubt that. And if I write down what I heard while listening to different kinds of media would provoke nothing but loud laughter from your part to say the least. It needs some explanation: I think and believe that what you actually hear is not what you measure with different test programs. That is why posting something that cannot be justified only experinced on a highly subjective basis is not what would seem a good enough evidence. What you mean maybe is to post my measured results which guarantee nothing about what you hear only what can be measured. For the sake of avoiding subjective off-the-forum-principles posts, I suggest that we take my note about choosing media and all a side-track which has nothing to do with the basic inspiration for my posting. If, however, I still have questions about Burrrn, I will continue to ask them here.

G

Gabor,

Good conclusion. Imagine that everybody would post untestable nonsense. This would turn this site as useless as any other hifi sites, which are full of bull***t and useless statements. This is why this site is different. If you cannot back up your claims, which are indeed laughable because if I rip those CD-s they become bit identical, then you probably want to keep quiet about them.

Triza

This post has been edited by Triza: Jun 27 2005, 22:46