High bitrate MP3 vs. Lossless ABX Tests?, Are there any studies...? |
High bitrate MP3 vs. Lossless ABX Tests?, Are there any studies...? |
Jun 2 2005, 00:10
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 23 Joined: 25-February 05 Member No.: 20147 |
Hi All,
I've been corrected before on this site for making the statement: "I can tell the difference between an MP3 and lossless". I've never ABX'ed myself but I was wondering if there has been a statistically significant (with regard to population) ABX study done with (say) Lame insane vs. Lossless? Clearly for myself it makes more sense to do a personal ABX but I was wondering in general about the population. I searched manually through the posts in this forum (since search seems useless for the term 'mp3') and didn't see anything. Thanks for help, ss. This post has been edited by Street Samurai: Jun 2 2005, 01:02 -------------------- http://www.informationaddiction.com
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Jun 2 2005, 19:09
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 3353 Joined: 6-July 03 From: Sachsen (DE) Member No.: 7609 |
Why make it complicated:
Comparing lossy VS lossless is common practive when ABXing. This is because a lossy sample is usually compared against the original(which is lossless). So, what you are asking about is not an exception but just normal standard practice in almost every ABX-test. Concerning numbers: taking high-bitrate ABXes on only this forum into account, they would total in hundreds if not come near thousand. So yes, statistical evidence(for non-transparency in everyday-listening) after dozens of tests is quite low. Of course, it is always possible to find single fragments of music, where a difference can be heard. However, most people dont care if of 10 full CDs there may be 10seconds where a difference can be noticed when listening to the 10sec sample in a loop a dozen times! The background noisefloor in your room in that case is a much bigger hazard. So, the evidence currently is low enough that one could ask "Is the background-noise in your room(a room is almost never absolutely silent) a problem to you? If no, then properly encoded high-bitrate lossy audio should be transparent to you during everyday-listening." - Lyx Edit: notice that you are asking the question the wrong way around: It is not possible to prove that something doesn't exist with absolute certainity. It is only possible to prove that something DOES exist. So, the question should not be if there are enough negative ABXes, but instead if there are enough positive ABXes under conditions which can be applied to normal listening. Thus, you cannot ask others to prove non-existence - the burden is on the one who claims that there IS a difference. This post has been edited by Lyx: Jun 2 2005, 19:33 -------------------- I am arrogant and I can afford it because I deliver.
|
|
|
|
Street Samurai High bitrate MP3 vs. Lossless ABX Tests? Jun 2 2005, 00:10
Defsac You couldn't do an accurate statistically sign... Jun 2 2005, 03:23
Cyaneyes QUOTE (Defsac @ Jun 1 2005, 10:23 PM)You coul... Jun 2 2005, 03:46
Defsac QUOTE (Cyaneyes @ Jun 2 2005, 12:46 PM)And th... Jun 2 2005, 07:05
Shade[ST] QUOTE (Street Samurai @ Jun 1 2005, 05:10 PM)... Jun 2 2005, 03:30
skamp QUOTE (Street Samurai @ Jun 2 2005, 12:10 AM)... Jun 2 2005, 07:42
Street Samurai QUOTE (skamp @ Jun 1 2005, 11:42 PM)"los... Jun 2 2005, 18:43
Shade[ST] QUOTE (Street Samurai @ Jun 2 2005, 11:43 AM)... Jun 2 2005, 19:25
Street Samurai QUOTE I've done the search I referred to you, ... Jun 2 2005, 19:59
indybrett I believe that all of the listening tests compare ... Jun 2 2005, 20:58
Shade[ST] Basically, any codec that is transparent versus th... Jun 2 2005, 21:14
Jebus To summarize:
a) A "lossless to high-bitrate... Jun 2 2005, 21:32
Zurman QUOTE (Jebus @ Jun 2 2005, 12:32 PM)To summar... Jun 2 2005, 22:01
Lyx QUOTE (Zurman @ Jun 2 2005, 11:01 PM)True....... Jun 2 2005, 22:45
Jebus QUOTE (Zurman @ Jun 2 2005, 01:01 PM)QUOTE (J... Jun 2 2005, 23:12
stephanV QUOTE (Jebus @ Jun 3 2005, 12:12 AM)Okay, fai... Jun 2 2005, 23:22
Pensive I'm new, hi everyone, i want to make a suggest... Jun 3 2005, 00:11
Jebus QUOTE (Pensive @ Jun 2 2005, 03:11 PM)I'm... Jun 3 2005, 00:15

Pensive QUOTE (Jebus @ Jun 3 2005, 12:15 AM)QUOTE (Pe... Jan 29 2006, 00:39

William QUOTE (Pensive @ Jan 28 2006, 11:39 PM)For go... Jan 29 2006, 02:39

Pensive QUOTE Prove it with ABX results.
Okay, my post wa... Jan 29 2006, 12:21

William QUOTE (Pensive @ Jan 29 2006, 11:21 AM)Supply... Jan 29 2006, 16:34
Lyx QUOTE (Pensive @ Jun 3 2005, 01:11 AM)When i ... Jun 3 2005, 00:16
legg Related to the first posts...
Without the intentio... Jun 2 2005, 23:16
Jebus yes yes, but what is the point of that? Okay, MP3 ... Jun 3 2005, 00:13
Woodinville Hmm, there's a bit of confusion in this thread... Jun 4 2005, 23:56
Lyx QUOTE (Woodinville @ Jun 5 2005, 12:56 AM)So,... Jun 5 2005, 02:14
Woodinville QUOTE (Lyx @ Jun 4 2005, 05:14 PM)The most so... Jun 5 2005, 02:26
Lyx QUOTE (Woodinville @ Jun 5 2005, 03:26 AM)Non... Jun 5 2005, 02:40
2Bdecided Woodinville,
I'm not quite sure what you... Jun 6 2005, 11:54
Woodinville QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Jun 6 2005, 02:54 AM)Howev... Jun 6 2005, 18:46
ff123 A few things to note about Roberto's tests:
1... Jun 6 2005, 20:24
Zoom QUOTE (Pensive @ Jan 28 2006, 06:39 PM)For go... Jan 29 2006, 02:29
Pio2001 In case you don't browse the forum using the s... Jan 30 2006, 02:19
ff123 QUOTE (Pio2001 @ Jan 29 2006, 05:19 PM)I... Jan 30 2006, 04:23![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 16:45 |