Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: aoTuV beta4 released (Read 64936 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #25 –
Thanks, john33!

Btw, to make it short, Aoyumi's tuning in b4 is basically for -q ... to -q ... ?
I just wanna know about this...

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #26 –
Excellent job, Aoyumi!

Thanks for compiles, John33!

I think it is time to do some testing…
Infrasonic Quartet + Sennheiser HD650 + Microlab Solo 2 mk3. 

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #27 –
Great job Aoyumi, Guruboolez and John33!
Ogg Vorbis for music and speech [q-2.0 - q6.0]
FLAC for recordings to be edited
Speex for speech

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #28 –
Quote
Anyway, is it OK to use the P3/AMD compile on a Pentium II system?
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=307180"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


These compiles work stable on my AMD K6-2 & K7 (win98se,nt4.0) if this helps anyone.

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #29 –
Quote
Anyway, is it OK to use the P3/AMD compile on a Pentium II system?[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=307180"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Yes

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #30 –
Quote
Just a small note on transient blurring: I did not test your encoder nor I had a look at the current source code. But I guess it's a good idea to tell you about the idea I had that does temporal noise shaping.

The portion which blurring produces fundamentally is micro atack, and is the pattern with which long block is used. In order to improve this problem more by the realistic bit rate, together with noise shaping, improvement of block switching is needed. However, I hesitate to improve this from the description about patent in "envelope.c"...

Quote
Btw, to make it short, Aoyumi's tuning in b4 is basically for -q ... to -q ... ?
I just wanna know about this...

There is some change which influences all bit rates and sampling rates.
Probably, change will be large also especially in it at the low bit rate.

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #31 –
[span style='font-size:8pt;line-height:100%']@rjamorim[/span]
I've tested it myself, but thanks anyway.
(and I think u knew this already... )

[span style='font-size:8pt;line-height:100%']@Aoyumi[/span]
Ok, thanks for clearing things up.
I always use the -q 4 setting for local playback.

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #32 –
The aoTuV beta4 was merged with libvorbis1.1.1.
There is a difference from the previous release version, only when the maximum and/or minimum of the bit rate are specified and offered in Quality mode.

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #33 –
Quote
The aoTuV beta4 was merged with libvorbis1.1.1.
There is a difference from the previous release version, only when the maximum and/or minimum of the bit rate are specified and offered in Quality mode.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=311803"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

New RareWares compiles, John33?
"ONLY THOSE WHO ATTEMPT THE IMPOSSIBLE WILL ACHIEVE THE ABSURD"
        - Oceania Association of Autonomous Astronauts

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #34 –
Quote
New RareWares compiles, John33?
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=311806"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

I think Aoyumi meant that 1.1.1 was merged with b4, not that b4 has been merged with the Vorbis trunk (chance would be a fine thing!).

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #35 –
Quote
Quote
New RareWares compiles, John33?
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=311806"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

I think Aoyumi meant that 1.1.1 was merged with b4, not that b4 has been merged with the Vorbis trunk (chance would be a fine thing!).
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=311807"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

As for beta4 (and also beta3) released first, libvorbis1.1.0 is the foundation.
And this version includes change of 1.1.1. 

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #36 –
Quote
Quote
The aoTuV beta4 was merged with libvorbis1.1.1.
There is a difference from the previous release version, only when the maximum and/or minimum of the bit rate are specified and offered in Quality mode.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=311803"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

New RareWares compiles, John33?
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=311806"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Now available at Rarewares.

These, of course, now include the updates of oggenc2 to 2.6 and oggdropXPd to 1.8.5 for these libraries.

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #37 –
Quick question, how much and what sort of testing would be needed to update the recommended encoder to 1.1.1 based aotuv b4?
Veni Vidi Vorbis.

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #38 –
Aoyumi, do you have an interest in adding channel coupling to multichannel encoding? its really missing in vorbis 
I know, that I know nothing (Socrates)

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #39 –
This is not really a useful post, but I just wanted to mention that I am thoroughly impressed with everything Aoyumi has contributed to Ogg Vorbis. Remember that the original aoTuV already won Roberto's latest 128kbps test. And now aoTuV beta 4 has won guruboolez's personal 80kbps test. Awesome work.
Over thinking, over analyzing separates the body from the mind.

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #40 –
I'd just like to chime in with thanks too.  Great work!  It's nice to see this kind of progress in Vorbis.

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #41 –
Now can someone help me get aoTuV set up to work with Foobar?

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #42 –
Quote
This is not really a useful post, but I just wanted to mention that I am thoroughly impressed with everything Aoyumi has contributed to Ogg Vorbis. Remember that the original aoTuV already won Roberto's latest 128kbps test. And now aoTuV beta 4 has won guruboolez's personal 80kbps test. Awesome work.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=312367"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Yeah, domo arigatous to aoyumi for his great work on vorbis!

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #43 –
Quote
Now can someone help me get aoTuV set up to work with Foobar?
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=313439"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


in the parameter box of the diskwriter setup use:

-qXX - -o %d

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #44 –
Quote
Aoyumi, do you have an interest in adding channel coupling to multichannel encoding? its really missing in vorbis.


I second you on that one  . I would guess that would really needs to be done is that there needs to be an some additional submapping tweaks? I think the residue values just need to coupled to or something along those lines for each channel  .
budding I.T professional

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #45 –
Quote
Quote
Now can someone help me get aoTuV set up to work with Foobar?
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=313439"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


in the parameter box of the diskwriter setup use:

-qXX - -o %d
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=313452"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
When I try to encode from FLAC files, it fails.

If I toy around with the settings, such as using temp files, then it seems I can get 1 file to encode before failing.
 

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #47 –
Quote
Aoyumi, do you have an interest in adding channel coupling to multichannel encoding? its really missing in vorbis 
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=312361"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

I do not have the test environment of a multichannel. Therefore, I cannot do the work.
Moreover, probably it is fairly serious work.

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #48 –
Quote
Quote
Aoyumi, do you have an interest in adding channel coupling to multichannel encoding? its really missing in vorbis 
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=312361"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

I do not have the test environment of a multichannel. Therefore, I cannot do the work.
Moreover, probably it is fairly serious work.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=314089"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

sad to hear that. what test environment would you need?
I know, that I know nothing (Socrates)

aoTuV beta4 released

Reply #49 –
Quote
Anyway, is it OK to use the P3/AMD compile on a Pentium II system?
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


No that won't work, because of the use of SSE instructions
But the P4 compiles work like a charm on my AMD Athlon64 system 
Maybe that fact could be added in the descriptions on rarewares.org or something like:
generic, MMX, SSE, SSE2

I guess the Cpus that are compatible with different compiles can be described the way it is done on the [a href="http://www.moox.ws/tech/mozilla/mdefs.htm]Moox[/url] site with Firefox compiles.