MPC VBR flaws (low volume & ringing), audible under specific conditions |
![]() ![]() |
MPC VBR flaws (low volume & ringing), audible under specific conditions |
Jul 15 2005, 11:57
Post
#101
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 6-November 01 Member No.: 419 |
QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Jul 12 2005, 11:53 AM) If you play nogap tracks out of sequence, you'll get clicking (even without ReplayGain). To avoid this, you should cross fade the tracks, or pay a DJ to do it for you! I'm sorry for the late reply.If you play nogap tracks in sequence, you'll get clicking only when using ReplayGain in Track mode. In this case, you could also avoid clicks by using a simple cross fade as above, but that overlaps the tracks and actually loses a bit of audio. Thank you for the detailed description. QUOTE (dev0) And it's certainly more elegant than the DSP/3rd RG-mode solution Klemm suggested. Hmm... Frank's idea is more complicated, but would solve not only clicks and sudden loudness jumps, but also help with very dynamic music, where some parts would have to be clipped to raise the avarage loudness to normal RG level. I think Frank had a very good idea. But I agree that 2Bdecided's proposed solution would be much easier to implement and would not change the general RG behaviour.QUOTE (guruboolez) A simple ath_gain -10 with classical lead to the same average value than --ath_gain -40 with the second group! Indeed. The relative difference is higher with classical music, too, when the ATH is lowered.(thinking loudly) If -14 dB with Q5 were enough and lowering the ATH for all profiles chosen as a temporary solution (using an additional switch, for instance), maybe it would be sufficient to lower the ATH in profiles > Q5 to that level only ? We know it's already being lowered with each profile. This way, the bitrate would not change as much beyond Q5. guruboolez, do you think the bitrate increases too much, when ATH is 14 dB lower ? Best regards, MTM -------------------- Marius the Mad
|
|
|
|
Jul 15 2005, 13:43
Post
#102
|
|
![]() ReplayGain developer Group: Developer Posts: 4615 Joined: 5-November 01 From: Yorkshire, UK Member No.: 409 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 15 2005, 13:49
Post
#103
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 6-November 01 Member No.: 419 |
Phew.
-------------------- Marius the Mad
|
|
|
|
Jul 17 2005, 13:53
Post
#104
|
|
![]() Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 3474 Joined: 7-November 01 From: Strasbourg (France) Member No.: 420 |
QUOTE (mtm @ Jul 15 2005, 11:57 AM) guruboolez, do you think the bitrate increases too much, when ATH is 14 dB lower ? In my opinion (and it's only mine), MPC --standard was mainly intersting for the quality/bitrate ratio: near-transparency a only 175...180 kbps (i.e. less than LAME --preset standard or Vorbis -q6). Current mppenc (1.15v) is less interesting than older release, due to the bitrate inflation (for classical, it's 7...10 kbps on average - sometimes 15...20 kbps with specific recordings). Now add 15...25 additional kbps with --ath_gain -14 command, and MPC --standard will clearly exceed 200 kbps. I let you imagine the gap between --radio and --standard. With such bitrate I would consider mpc --standard to my eyes as something less interesting than before. |
|
|
|
Jul 20 2005, 16:52
Post
#105
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 915 Joined: 22-October 01 From: the Netherlands Member No.: 335 |
QUOTE (mtm @ Jul 15 2005, 12:57 PM) Frank's idea is more complicated, but would solve not only clicks and sudden loudness jumps, but also help with very dynamic music, where some parts would have to be clipped to raise the avarage loudness to normal RG level. That idea actualy is more that of an advanced compressor. Replaygain is the more practical idea, thus easier to support on many formats and players. 2Bdecided's idea of a volume fade, from one RG value into the next, could be a player feature. (zZzZzZz?) -------------------- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 13:47 |