Plugin foo_dsp_src violates copyright |
Plugin foo_dsp_src violates copyright |
Aug 9 2005, 11:16
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 9-August 05 Member No.: 23796 |
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am the author and copyright owner of software known as "Secret Rabbit Code" which is released under the terms of the GNU General Public License. On Monday August 8th 2005, I was made aware of a web site: http://pelit.koillismaa.fi/plugins/dsp.php which contains a php redirect link http://pelit.koillismaa.fi/plugins/redir.php?id=494 which redirects to : http://sbougribate.free.fr/Files/Foobar2000/foo_dsp_src.zip which offers a binary derived from Secret Rabbit Code in direct violation of the GNU GPL [0]. I would like the people responsible for the above websites to do the following: Free.fr (sbougribate.free.fr / Proxad.net): Please remove the offending binary immediately. If the person who posted the binary wishes to comply with the GNU GPL they can contact me at the email address listed on the Secret Rabbit Code web page. koillismaa.fi: Please get the owner of the page: http://pelit.koillismaa.fi/plugins/dsp.php to remove the link to the binary as soons as possible and replace it with a statement that the link was removed because of copyright violation. I look forward to your swift reponse to this copyright violation. Regards, Erik |
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 22 2005, 23:32
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 498 Joined: 2-October 01 Member No.: 168 |
From FSF's Frequently Asked Questions about the GNU GPL:
QUOTE Can I release a non-free program that's designed to load a GPL-covered plug-in? It depends on how the program invokes its plug-ins. If the program uses fork and exec to invoke plug-ins, then the plug-ins are separate programs, so the license of the plug-in makes no requirements about the main program. If the program dynamically links plug-ins, and they make function calls to each other and share data structures, we believe they form a single program, which must be treated as an extension of both the main program and the plug-ins. In order to use the GPL-covered plug-ins, the main program must be released under the GPL or a GPL-compatible free software license, and that the terms of the GPL must be followed when the main program is distributed for use with these plug-ins. If the program dynamically links plug-ins, but the communication between them is limited to invoking the `main' function of the plug-in with some options and waiting for it to return, that is a borderline case. Hope it helps. |
|
|
|
m3ga Plugin foo_dsp_src violates copyright Aug 9 2005, 11:16
Gabriel Have you contacted the plugin author about source ... Aug 9 2005, 11:54
m3ga QUOTE (Gabriel @ Aug 9 2005, 08:54 PM)Have yo... Aug 9 2005, 12:29
Gabriel QUOTE GPL cannot be linked to closed source code. ... Aug 9 2005, 13:21
PoisonDan QUOTE (Gabriel @ Aug 9 2005, 02:21 PM)QUOTE G... Aug 9 2005, 13:40

m3ga QUOTE (PoisonDan @ Aug 9 2005, 10:40 PM)I don... Aug 9 2005, 14:40

rjamorim QUOTE (m3ga @ Aug 9 2005, 10:40 AM)I am now l... Aug 31 2005, 01:40


kode54 QUOTE (rjamorim @ Aug 30 2005, 05:40 PM)in_ma... Aug 31 2005, 15:18

m3ga QUOTE (m3ga @ Aug 9 2005, 23:40) I am now... Jun 6 2006, 09:41

OCedHrt Couldn't we consider Foobar2000 to be the ... Jun 6 2006, 10:04

TrNSZ Erik has been nice enough to provide his resampler... Jun 6 2006, 13:53
KarLKoX QUOTE (Gabriel @ Aug 9 2005, 04:21 AM)QUOTE G... Aug 9 2005, 14:19
rjamorim Weeeee. Somebody didn't do his licensing homew... Aug 31 2005, 01:14
rjamorim QUOTE (PatchWorKs @ Oct 22 2005, 08:32 PM)Fro... Oct 23 2005, 00:03
m3ga [quote=rjamorim,Oct 23 2005, 09:03 AM]
> First... Oct 23 2005, 09:05
rjamorim QUOTE (m3ga @ Oct 23 2005, 06:05 AM)> Firs... Oct 23 2005, 14:36
m3ga QUOTE (rjamorim @ Oct 23 2005, 11:36 PM)Calm ... Oct 23 2005, 19:04
rjamorim QUOTE (m3ga @ Oct 23 2005, 04:04 PM)Noone can... Oct 23 2005, 21:30

Otto42 QUOTE (rjamorim @ Oct 23 2005, 03:30 PM)But I... Oct 27 2005, 01:34

rjamorim QUOTE (Otto42 @ Oct 26 2005, 10:34 PM)> 3.... Oct 27 2005, 02:07

iStormy [removed] Dec 12 2005, 08:49
kode54 QUOTE (m3ga @ Oct 23 2005, 11:04 AM)Some time... Oct 24 2005, 15:01
rjamorim Now that I think about it, I should urge John33 to... Oct 24 2005, 15:19
kjoonlee Um, you're taking this too far. the GPL specif... Oct 24 2005, 16:55
rjamorim QUOTE (kjoonlee @ Oct 24 2005, 01:55 PM)Um, y... Oct 24 2005, 20:25
Lyx I know that licences and laws aren't about it,... Oct 24 2005, 21:00
kjoonlee IANAL.
rjamorim, aren't you verging way off-... Oct 24 2005, 21:01
rjamorim QUOTE (Lyx @ Oct 24 2005, 06:00 PM)But concer... Oct 24 2005, 22:16
Kadavro We're about to have a brand new law here on ne... Dec 12 2005, 06:47
Lyx QUOTE (Kadavro @ Dec 12 2005, 06:47 AM)We... Dec 12 2005, 12:57

anza QUOTE (Lyx @ Dec 12 2005, 01:57 PM)ROFLMAO - ... Dec 12 2005, 13:47


Lyx QUOTE (anza @ Dec 12 2005, 01:47 PM)You can p... Dec 12 2005, 14:20

Kadavro QUOTE (Lyx @ Dec 12 2005, 01:57 PM)ROFLMAO - ... Dec 13 2005, 15:39
ssamadhi97 QUOTE (Kadavro @ Dec 12 2005, 06:47 AM)Since ... Dec 13 2005, 23:15
Sandman2012 I was never interested in this plugin until there ... Dec 13 2005, 00:00
klez QUOTE It would make sense to be respectful of the ... Jun 7 2006, 13:28
saivert The GPL license was made to protect free and open ... Aug 6 2006, 12:21
Enig123 Sorry to take this old thread up. I'm wonderin... Sep 18 2008, 15:34
Yirkha $ure. Sep 18 2008, 15:56![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 12:48 |