freeformat at 640 kbps and foobar2000, possibilities? |
freeformat at 640 kbps and foobar2000, possibilities? |
 Nov 15 2005, 22:33
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 138 Joined: 27-July 04 Member No.: 15817  |
Is it possible to play freeformat mp3 at 640 kbps in foobar? If yes, how? If not, why?
I don't actually intend to use something like this, I'm just collecting some information for my college project. Many thanks. This post has been edited by Wintershade: Nov 15 2005, 22:35 -------------------- Only the best is good enough.
|
 |
 
|
 |
|
Dec 17 2006, 00:17
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4336 Joined: 23-June 06 Member No.: 32180 |
Firon's right. Not many people are going to claim that 320kbps does not offer transparency for average material. Anyway, while I don't see much use in that test, I agree with you that such a bitrate for MP3 is overkill; in fact, I'd say that it is so for any lossy format and recommend lossless instead.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2006, 12:20
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 65 Joined: 3-May 05 Member No.: 21842 |
QUOTE (dv1989 @ Dec 16 2006, 18:17)  Firon's right. Not many people are going to claim that 320kbps does not offer transparency for average material. Anyway, while I don't see much use in that test, I agree with you that such a bitrate for MP3 is overkill; in fact, I'd say that it is so for any lossy format and recommend lossless instead. The use I see is that it proves that 640k mp3 is not going to be a viable format as a standard. The filesize is way too larger for that you get vs 320k. The differences are not that great as to be able to 100% say oh yes, 640k is better. |
|
|
|
Wintershade freeformat at 640 kbps and foobar2000 Nov 15 2005, 22:33
kalmark Yes, IIRC. foo_mad, IIRC.
Edit: Garf probably kno... Nov 15 2005, 22:34 Garf Not possible. Nov 15 2005, 23:11 JWolf QUOTE (Wintershade @ Nov 15 2005, 16:33) ... Nov 28 2006, 06:17 Canar At 640kbps, there is no sensible reason to use MP3... Nov 28 2006, 06:32
Gabriel QUOTE (Canar @ Nov 28 2006, 06:32) Freefo... Nov 28 2006, 10:23 JWolf I just compared 320k and 640k from an LPCM 16-bit ... Nov 28 2006, 06:56 digital QUOTE (JWolf @ Nov 28 2006, 00:56) I just... Nov 28 2006, 08:36 JWolf QUOTE (digital @ Nov 28 2006, 02:36) QUOT... Dec 1 2006, 02:20 hlloyge QUOTE (JWolf @ Nov 28 2006, 07:56) I just... Nov 28 2006, 08:53 JWolf QUOTE (hlloyge @ Nov 28 2006, 02:53) QUOT... Dec 1 2006, 02:07 hlloyge QUOTE (JWolf @ Dec 1 2006, 03:07) I forgo... Dec 1 2006, 08:53 JWolf QUOTE (hlloyge @ Dec 1 2006, 02:53) QUOTE... Dec 1 2006, 20:52 evereux QUOTE (JWolf @ Dec 1 2006, 19:52) I can... Dec 1 2006, 21:35 JWolf QUOTE (evereux @ Dec 1 2006, 15:35) QUOTE... Dec 16 2006, 20:29 HbG If it is compliant, does that mean it is in theory... Nov 28 2006, 13:01 robert Freeformat is CBR by nature. Nov 28 2006, 13:24 Klyith QUOTE (HbG @ Nov 28 2006, 07:01) If it is... Nov 28 2006, 18:17 Canar Thanks for the correction, Gabriel. Nov 29 2006, 00:51 JWolf 640k mp3 vs. 320k mp3 round 1
QUOTE foo_abx 1.3.1... Dec 16 2006, 21:47 Firon The correct way to interpret that is that you were... Dec 16 2006, 21:50 dv1989 As far as I know, ABX testing is intended to prove... Dec 18 2006, 12:48 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 08:08 |
