NSTL WMA Pro listening test, MS claims test proves WMA Pro > HE-AAC |
NSTL WMA Pro listening test, MS claims test proves WMA Pro > HE-AAC |
 Jan 11 2006, 21:40
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1559 Joined: 24-June 02 From: Catalunya(Spain) Member No.: 2383  |
QUOTE (gameplaya15143 @ Jan 11 2006, 03:32 AM) i think they are 'supposed' to represent a % quality.. but they are just high-to-low (or should it say low-to-lower... uh oh.. i better watch out for tos8)  Have you heard problems with a ~240Kbps VBR (Q98) wma 9.1 file to say it is low quality? |
 |
 
|
 |
|
Jan 12 2006, 01:01
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1354 Joined: 9-January 05 From: JJ's office. Member No.: 18957 |
QUOTE ([JAZ] @ Jan 11 2006, 12:40 PM) QUOTE (gameplaya15143 @ Jan 11 2006, 03:32 AM) i think they are 'supposed' to represent a % quality.. but they are just high-to-low (or should it say low-to-lower... uh oh.. i better watch out for tos8) Have you heard problems with a ~240Kbps VBR (Q98) wma 9.1 file to say it is low quality? How about this new report (DBT and all) on WMA Pro quality? http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsme...Comparison.aspx -------------------- -----
J. D. (jj) Johnston |
|
|
|
|
Jan 13 2006, 04:57
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 484 Joined: 8-January 06 From: Earth Member No.: 26978 |
QUOTE (singaiya @ Jan 12 2006, 03:49 PM) "NSTL is the leading independent information technology testing organization for the computer industry, dedicated to providing high quality services and test tools...." .... they forgot to add "maybe"  I didn't know they were using some new wma 10+ codec... just have to wait till it's available to see how it really fares 
-------------------- Vorbis-q0-lowpass99
lame3.93.1-q5-V9-k-nspsytune |
|
|
|
 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 17:49 |
