Mpc Quality Settings For Dolby 2.1 Streams, Is the default --quality 5 insufficient? |
Mpc Quality Settings For Dolby 2.1 Streams, Is the default --quality 5 insufficient? |
Oct 28 2002, 19:03
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 28 Joined: 28-October 02 From: London, UK Member No.: 3644 |
Not sure whether this has been addressed before. Had a look through the forums, but could not find anything at first glance.
Something I picked up quite some time ago with MP3 was that the surround channel in a Dolby 2.1 (is that the correct term?) stream contained severe artifacts even with fairly high quality settings. I experimented with MPC, and found this to also be true to for --quality 5. --quality 6 is significantly better, but I lack the equipment and expertise to truly compare the original with varying quality settings. My question is: is this reasonable cause for encoding albums at --quality 6 or higher? In my opinion, yes. I have seen mention of other parameters (--ms?) that could possibly provide better stereo encoding (which is where the surround channel data really lives, isn't it?). Can anyone maybe confirm my findings and comment on whether I'm just being paranoid, or whether it is more appropriate to use other parameters for such streams, in stead of --quality 6? Note that many albums (especially live shows) seem to have this type of surround channel information; I believe it's either intentional or a side-effect of the way 2.1 decoding interprets the audio. |
|
|
|
atom Mpc Quality Settings For Dolby 2.1 Streams Oct 28 2002, 19:03
atom Have done some more reading and testing. A fairly... Oct 29 2002, 21:46
smok3 some rumble:
very interesting, did you test any ot... Oct 29 2002, 23:14
floyd QUOTE (atom @ Oct 28 2002 - 12:03 PM)Note tha... Oct 29 2002, 23:31
atom A good example of an album with fairly strong surr... Oct 30 2002, 17:37
Gecko MPC is designed and tuned only for normal stereo l... Oct 30 2002, 19:14
floyd QUOTE (atom @ Oct 30 2002 - 10:37 AM)My probl... Oct 30 2002, 22:15
atom Another happy customer :-) Thanks, Gecko. Your c... Oct 31 2002, 02:05
Trelane I've been using a "poor man's surroun... Nov 3 2002, 06:51
Dibrom QUOTE (atom @ Oct 30 2002 - 06:05 PM)The funn... Nov 3 2002, 07:01
CiTay QUOTE (Dibrom @ Nov 3 2002 - 07:01 AM)Maybe s... Nov 3 2002, 14:45
user Adding --ms 15 in generally to --quality 5 ... 8 ?... Nov 30 2002, 15:19
liekloo Yes this is a very interesting topic.
I do think ... Nov 30 2002, 16:58
CiTay We surely shouldn't generally append this swit... Nov 30 2002, 17:53
user I hope, my words above are not misunderstood, plea... Nov 30 2002, 18:03
CiTay Got an email from Frank Klemm (you too, user, thx)... Nov 30 2002, 23:20
ssamadhi97 i don't like the term "stereo imaging... Nov 30 2002, 23:42
CiTay You are right, "surround information" th... Nov 30 2002, 23:46
user yes, you are right. I don't know, if Frank has... Nov 30 2002, 23:47
user Adding --ms 15 does not cause artefacts or worse s... Dec 1 2002, 19:00
atom Hi folks. As is implied in my earlier tests, I DI... Dec 4 2002, 02:49
floyd hmmm, i have about 15 gigs of mpcs (mostly), and n... Dec 4 2002, 07:42
ProtectYaNeck36 please correct me if i am wrong but, just because ... Dec 4 2002, 08:04
David Nordin Uhm..
Dolby Surround is just 2 channels where you ... Dec 4 2002, 08:38
floyd QUOTE (ProtectYaNeck36 @ Dec 4 2002 - 01:04 A... Dec 4 2002, 23:34
Mr. Superbad I believe NIN's broken was made with DPL in mi... Dec 5 2002, 00:04
atom After considerably more searching than I anticipat... Dec 5 2002, 02:59
floyd I agree with you there. Movie soundtracks likely ... Dec 5 2002, 03:40
user QUOTE (floyd @ Dec 4 2002 - 11:34 PM)QUOTE (P... Dec 5 2002, 09:24
atom QUOTE (user @ Dec 5 2002 - 12:24 AM)hmm, have... Dec 9 2002, 03:27![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 07:38 |