Sampling rates higher than 44.1Khz? |
Sampling rates higher than 44.1Khz? |
Feb 5 2006, 01:10
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 110 Joined: 3-November 03 Member No.: 9637 |
I recently met a musician who claims he can quite easily hear the difference between 44.1KHz and 96KHz.
This shocked me a little because I'd always been told that the human ear cannot hear any higher quality than CD (44.1KHz) quality. So... was this guy just lying (or fooled by his senses), or was I being lied to when I was told the human ear cannot hear any higher quality than CD? This post has been edited by Grand Dizzy: Feb 5 2006, 01:11 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Feb 9 2006, 18:17
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 1317 Joined: 20-March 04 From: Göttingen (DE) Member No.: 12875 |
QUOTE (Grand Dizzy @ Feb 8 2006, 11:06 PM) This thread is fascinating! But most of it is too techy for me unfortunately. Could anyone try again to explain how these byproduct tones/beats come about? And what is the low pass filter's involvement in this? (What is a low pass filter anyway?) Fascinating? Hmm.... May seem so. But I think that some posts here are actually a bit misleading/misinformed. QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 7 2006, 10:27 PM) QUOTE (SebastianG @ Feb 7 2006, 04:29 PM) [...] Mathematically, cos(32KHz)+cos(30KHz) = 2*cos(31KHz)*cos(1KHz). Add the time in equation and you have a 1 KHz harmonic with a variable intensity of 2*cos(31KHz*t). [...] So what ? Just because there's suddenly a cos(1kHz*t) in a product you think you should be able to hear this one? Do you realize that you can also interpret your formula as a 31 kHz sinusoid with an amplitude modulation at a rate of 1 kHz ? Truth is: It does not matter whether a product representation contains usually audible signals. The first form (cos(32kHz)+cos(30kHz)) is the really interesting one. Why ? Because we've a bunch of filters in our inner ear (hair + hair cell) seperating frequencies -- every hair (depending on its location/length) has a certain resonance frequency and acts like a bandpass filter. From signal theory we know such filters are linear and time-invariant (LTI system theory, please check the linearity property on this site). The linearity suggests that if you can't hear a single tone at 30 or 32 kHz, you also cannot hear anything when cos(30kHz*t)+cos(32kHz*t) is "in the air". QUOTE (mandel @ Feb 7 2006, 11:51 PM) That's really interesting actually. I just created a 96khz wav file with a 30k and a 32k tone and could hear a beat frequency as you say. Though at 2khz not 1khz This is likely due to one of these things: - improper anti alias filtering of your sound reproduction system - non-linear distortions of your sound reproduction system (including clipping) edit: typos HTH, Sebi This post has been edited by SebastianG: Feb 9 2006, 18:22 |
|
|
|
Grand Dizzy Sampling rates higher than 44.1Khz? Feb 5 2006, 01:10
AndyH-ha The most profound differences are not higher frequ... Feb 5 2006, 03:34
gameplaya15143 call him/her on it... make em prove it to you
it ... Feb 5 2006, 03:38
Grand Dizzy Andy, I didn't realise antialiasing filters we... Feb 5 2006, 21:48
AndyH-ha MOST audio players (as part of the DAC) use anti-a... Feb 6 2006, 03:17
Grand Dizzy Duhh... sorry, that all went completely over my he... Feb 6 2006, 13:49
krabapple QUOTE (Grand Dizzy @ Feb 6 2006, 07:49 AM)Duh... Feb 7 2006, 17:48
hdante QUOTE (krabapple @ Feb 7 2006, 02:48 PM)QUOTE... Feb 7 2006, 18:06
SebastianG QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 7 2006, 06:06 PM)[...] Fo... Feb 7 2006, 19:29
hdante QUOTE (SebastianG @ Feb 7 2006, 04:29 PM)QUOT... Feb 7 2006, 22:27
mandel QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 7 2006, 10:27 PM)QUOTE (S... Feb 7 2006, 23:51
RockFan QUOTE (mandel @ Feb 7 2006, 02:51 PM)That... Feb 8 2006, 00:07

krabapple QUOTE (RockFan @ Feb 7 2006, 06:07 PM)QUOTE (... Feb 8 2006, 00:27
hdante QUOTE (mandel @ Feb 7 2006, 08:51 PM)That... Feb 8 2006, 00:48

mandel QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 8 2006, 12:48 AM)QUOTE (m... Feb 8 2006, 01:04

WmAx QUOTE (mandel @ Feb 7 2006, 08:04 PM)Here is ... Feb 8 2006, 01:15


mandel QUOTE (WmAx @ Feb 8 2006, 01:15 AM)QUOTE (man... Feb 8 2006, 01:28


ChiGung QUOTE (mandel @ Feb 7 2006, 08:04 PM)Here is ... Feb 8 2006, 04:39


WmAx QUOTE (mandel @ Feb 7 2006, 08:28 PM)-
Here w... Feb 9 2006, 06:22


bug80 QUOTE (WmAx @ Feb 9 2006, 07:22 AM)Did you no... Feb 9 2006, 10:48


WmAx QUOTE (bug80 @ Feb 9 2006, 05:48 AM)QUOTE (Wm... Feb 9 2006, 15:32

hdante QUOTE (mandel @ Feb 7 2006, 10:04 PM)Same res... Feb 8 2006, 15:41

mandel QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 8 2006, 03:41 PM)QUOTE (m... Feb 8 2006, 18:12
WmAx QUOTE (mandel @ Feb 7 2006, 06:51 PM)Why do y... Feb 8 2006, 00:57
enry2k I know that oversampling in A/D and D/A converters... Feb 6 2006, 14:06
Hollunder QUOTE (Grand Dizzy @ Feb 6 2006, 01:49 PM)Duh... Feb 6 2006, 15:53
Grand Dizzy Oh I think I get it.
It's a lot like picture ... Feb 6 2006, 23:40
Hollunder right, it's principialy the same
I found a ni... Feb 7 2006, 12:58
RockFan QUOTE (Grand Dizzy @ Feb 4 2006, 04:10 PM)I r... Feb 7 2006, 20:38
krabapple QUOTE (RockFan @ Feb 7 2006, 02:38 PM)Now as ... Feb 7 2006, 22:11

RockFan QUOTE (krabapple @ Feb 7 2006, 01:11 PM)Wrong... Feb 7 2006, 23:21

WmAx QUOTE (RockFan @ Feb 7 2006, 06:21 PM)You sim... Feb 7 2006, 23:45

RockFan QUOTE (RockFan @ Feb 7 2006, 02:21 PM)Of cour... Feb 7 2006, 23:51
hdante QUOTE (RockFan @ Feb 7 2006, 05:38 PM)On play... Feb 7 2006, 22:37

RockFan QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 7 2006, 01:37 PM)Again, I... Feb 7 2006, 23:40

krabapple QUOTE (RockFan @ Feb 7 2006, 05:40 PM)QUOTE (... Feb 8 2006, 00:00


RockFan QUOTE (krabapple @ Feb 7 2006, 03:00 PM)I loo... Feb 8 2006, 00:11


RockFan You bore me.
The last word is yours, please do sa... Feb 8 2006, 00:19

hdante QUOTE (RockFan @ Feb 7 2006, 08:40 PM)But man... Feb 8 2006, 00:22
WmAx QUOTE (RockFan @ Feb 7 2006, 03:38 PM)Please ... Feb 7 2006, 23:39
RockFan QUOTE (WmAx @ Feb 7 2006, 02:39 PM)By reading... Feb 7 2006, 23:44
sven_Bent @gangran dizzy
i hear alot of audiophiles around ... Feb 7 2006, 23:04
AndyH-ha QUOTE Why do you say the hi-res mix may be safely ... Feb 8 2006, 00:27
mandel QUOTE (AndyH-ha @ Feb 8 2006, 12:27 AM)Q... Feb 8 2006, 00:37
krabapple http://www.ioforums.net/forums/view_topic....rum_i... Feb 8 2006, 00:49
Grand Dizzy This thread is fascinating! But most of it is ... Feb 8 2006, 23:06
ChiGung QUOTE (Grand Dizzy @ Feb 8 2006, 10:06 PM)Thi... Feb 9 2006, 02:53
LoKi128 QUOTE (ChiGung @ Feb 8 2006, 08:53 PM)The que... Feb 9 2006, 04:26
ChiGung QUOTE (LoKi128 @ Feb 9 2006, 03:26 AM)The sou... Feb 9 2006, 13:53
LoKi128 Well, here is what little I can remember from RF t... Feb 9 2006, 02:31
Hollunder I guess the best way to proof that it has influenc... Feb 9 2006, 04:26
krabapple more on the 'beating' issue, from James Jo... Feb 9 2006, 18:13
hdante There's too much interpreting here. I've f... Feb 9 2006, 18:34
ChiGung QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 9 2006, 05:34 PM)QUOTE (m... Feb 9 2006, 19:00

SebastianG QUOTE (ChiGung @ Feb 9 2006, 07:00 PM)Unfortu... Feb 9 2006, 19:25


ChiGung Points well made sebG - seems you are cool
-Trie... Feb 9 2006, 19:40


hdante QUOTE (SebastianG @ Feb 9 2006, 04:25 PM)I co... Feb 9 2006, 19:42

hdante QUOTE (ChiGung @ Feb 9 2006, 04:00 PM) That i... Feb 9 2006, 19:39

bug80 QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 9 2006, 08:39 PM)Ok, I th... Feb 9 2006, 19:51

hdante QUOTE (bug80 @ Feb 9 2006, 04:51 PM)And how e... Feb 9 2006, 19:58

bug80 QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 9 2006, 08:58 PM)QUOTE (b... Feb 9 2006, 20:06

hdante QUOTE (bug80 @ Feb 9 2006, 05:06 PM)I did and... Feb 9 2006, 20:09

bug80 QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 9 2006, 09:09 PM)QUOTE (b... Feb 9 2006, 20:16

hdante QUOTE (bug80 @ Feb 9 2006, 05:16 PM)... yes? ... Feb 9 2006, 20:23


bug80 QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 9 2006, 09:23 PM)QUOTE (b... Feb 9 2006, 20:26


hdante QUOTE (bug80 @ Feb 9 2006, 05:26 PM)By now, d... Feb 9 2006, 21:19


bug80 QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 9 2006, 10:19 PM)QUOTE (b... Feb 9 2006, 21:51

ChiGung QUOTE (bug80 @ Feb 9 2006, 07:16 PM)QUOTE (hd... Feb 9 2006, 20:40

bug80 QUOTE (ChiGung @ Feb 9 2006, 09:40 PM)QUOTE (... Feb 9 2006, 20:45

ChiGung QUOTE (bug80 @ Feb 9 2006, 07:45 PM)QUOTE (Ch... Feb 9 2006, 20:56
mandel QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 9 2006, 06:34 PM)There... Feb 9 2006, 22:40
hdante QUOTE (SebastianG @ Feb 9 2006, 03:17 PM)So w... Feb 9 2006, 18:46
bug80 QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 9 2006, 07:46 PM)Remember... Feb 9 2006, 18:54
krabapple JJ again , at even greater length and detail, on h... Feb 9 2006, 18:45
bug80 Here is a little Matlab code for anyone who likes ... Feb 9 2006, 19:08
ChiGung QUOTE (bug80 @ Feb 9 2006, 06:08 PM)Here is a... Feb 9 2006, 19:11
bug80 QUOTE (ChiGung @ Feb 9 2006, 08:11 PM)QUOTE (... Feb 9 2006, 19:15
ChiGung QUOTE (bug80 @ Feb 9 2006, 06:15 PM)QUOTE (Ch... Feb 9 2006, 19:21
bug80 QUOTE (ChiGung @ Feb 9 2006, 08:21 PM)QUOTE (... Feb 9 2006, 19:25
hdante QUOTE (ChiGung @ Feb 9 2006, 04:21 PM)Ok, ill... Feb 9 2006, 19:45
ChiGung QUOTE (hdante @ Feb 9 2006, 06:45 PM)QUOTE (C... Feb 9 2006, 19:55
SebastianG It's a matter of time/frequency resolution. If... Feb 9 2006, 20:56
Pio2001 Oh no !
QUOTE (AndyH-ha @ Feb 5 2... Feb 10 2006, 00:48
ChiGung I think i can see that happening in the amp - that... Feb 10 2006, 01:53
Pio2001 QUOTE (mandel @ Feb 8 2006, 02:28 AM)Here whe... Feb 10 2006, 00:49
bug80 QUOTE (Pio2001 @ Feb 10 2006, 01:49 AM)QUOTE ... Feb 10 2006, 11:17
LoKi128 QUOTE (bug80 @ Feb 10 2006, 05:17 AM)Anyway, ... Feb 11 2006, 04:04
Rotareneg For an example of ultrasonic sound producing audib... Feb 10 2006, 07:18![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 16:53 |