Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Can't compile foo_input_raw from 0.9 SDK (Read 5250 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Can't compile foo_input_raw from 0.9 SDK

Got such error


I'm lazy in VC++ options, please PROVIDE COMPLIEABLE sample in SDK

Thanx!

Can't compile foo_input_raw from 0.9 SDK

Reply #1 –
Ok, fixed using foobar2000_component_client
Anyway I believe SDK must contain 100% working compileable samples (wich does not reques additional tweaks before) - just open solution and compile...

Can't compile foo_input_raw from 0.9 SDK

Reply #2 –
How about reading the readme doc before trying to use the SDK?
Microsoft Windows: We can't script here, this is bat country.

Can't compile foo_input_raw from 0.9 SDK

Reply #3 –
Quote
How about reading the readme doc before trying to use the SDK?
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=372853"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

As I said before it's my fault. Sorry...

Anycase why not include 100% compilable VS2005 solution in SDK?


And Yet another question. I'm planning to write input plugin to be able play audio stream from avisynth scripts. There are open() entry point but no close() entry point. Does it mean I must place all close/cleanup code in destructor?


And Yet another question 2. I'm planning to write wrapper around BASS library for WMA input. Unfortunally current BASS library architecture reques global initialization/finalization. Any suggestion how I can implement it?

Thanx!

Can't compile foo_input_raw from 0.9 SDK

Reply #4 –
Quote
And Yet another question. I'm planning to write input plugin to be able play audio stream from avisynth scripts. There are open() entry point but no close() entry point. Does it mean I must place all close/cleanup code in destructor?
Yes.
Quote
And Yet another question 2. I'm planning to write wrapper around BASS library for WMA input. Unfortunally current BASS library architecture reques global initialization/finalization. Any suggestion how I can implement it?[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=372857"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
WMA support is on todo list for 0.9.1, so perhaps you should skip that for now. I would personally implement that using global instance counter (protected by a critical section), initializing the library when first instance is created and deinitializing when last one is destroyed.
Microsoft Windows: We can't script here, this is bat country.

Can't compile foo_input_raw from 0.9 SDK

Reply #5 –
Quote
Quote
And Yet another question. I'm planning to write input plugin to be able play audio stream from avisynth scripts. There are open() entry point but no close() entry point. Does it mean I must place all close/cleanup code in destructor?
Yes.

Thanx.

Quote
Quote
And Yet another question 2. I'm planning to write wrapper around BASS library for WMA input. Unfortunally current BASS library architecture reques global initialization/finalization. Any suggestion how I can implement it?[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=372857"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
WMA support is on todo list for 0.9.1, so perhaps you should skip that for now. I would personally implement that using global instance counter (protected by a critical section), initializing the library when first instance is created and deinitializing when last one is destroyed.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=372861"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Is'nt InterlockedIncrement/InterlockedDecrement better for this pupose? How about tracker music support (IT/XM/MOD/FT)?
Anyway thanx a lot.

PS. Does You have any plans to publish something like "Best prectics for plugin development" document?
PS2. Seems like you use some special format for  source code commenting to allow automatic documentation generation (something like JavaDoc). Is it possible to provide generated documentation too?

Can't compile foo_input_raw from 0.9 SDK

Reply #6 –
Quote
Is'nt InterlockedIncrement/InterlockedDecrement better for this pupose?
No, because it will explode if a new instance is created while global cleanup call is still in progress.
Quote
PS. Does You have any plans to publish something like "Best prectics for plugin development" document?
Not at the moment.
Quote
PS2. Seems like you use some special format for  source code commenting to allow automatic documentation generation (something like JavaDoc). Is it possible to provide generated documentation too?
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=372874"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Comments are in doxygen format. However, current version of doxygen software had limitations that prevented it from working correctly last time we tried (crippled namespace handling). We might switch to another format when we find software that meets our requirements.
Microsoft Windows: We can't script here, this is bat country.

Can't compile foo_input_raw from 0.9 SDK

Reply #7 –
Quote
How about tracker music support (IT/XM/MOD/FT)?
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

[a href="http://kode54.foobar2000.org/]http://kode54.foobar2000.org/[/url]

Can't compile foo_input_raw from 0.9 SDK

Reply #8 –
Quote
Quote
Is'nt InterlockedIncrement/InterlockedDecrement better for this pupose?
No, because it will explode if a new instance is created while global cleanup call is still in progress.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=372875"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Oh thanx. I was a stupid