Yalac - Comparisons, How the evaluation release compares to other compressors |
Yalac - Comparisons, How the evaluation release compares to other compressors |
Apr 10 2006, 07:30
Post
#1
|
|
|
TAK Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1043 Joined: 1-April 06 Member No.: 29051 |
Content
In this thread the testers should post comparisons of the preset modes of Yalac (Working name for "Yet another lossless audio compressor") with other lossless compressors. The results for specific variations of individual encoder options should go into the thread " Yalac – Evaluation and optimization". Guidelines Please post the exact version number of the compressors. Compression ratio should be specified in percent of the uncompressed file size. Speed figures should be specified as multiple of real time (duration of the test files). A specification of your test system, especially the CPU, would be helpful. Open end: Feel free to add more results later. What happened Bad timing of my introduction (April 1.) forced an early publication of an evaluation release of Yalac, to prove, that it really works. This are results of 8 forum members, who where so kind to test the experimental release for me. Many thanks! Goals Yalac should finally achieve compression ratios on par with Monkey's Audio High. Decoding speed should be at least two times higher than Monkey and never be significantly lower than with FLAC (possibly Yalac will later be integrated into FLAC). My next steps The first results i have received from the testers show me some weaknesses of the encoder. That's a good thing, because that means, that there definitely is a chance to increase the compression efficiency! Same is true for the speed; especially the decoder is not fully optimized yet. But it will take some time, before i will come up with an optimized release. Links to 24 bit files i have used I think, they are hard to find. CODE 44 KHz, 24 bit mytek_8X96_24bit_web.wav Mytek-stereo96adc_evans.wav Mytek-stereo96adc_ravel.wav Source: http://www.mytekdigital.com/compare/comparison1.htm 48 KHz, 24 bit McDougalsMen24bit_48kHz.wav sister24bit_48kHz.wav Source: http://ff123.net/samples.html Or make a better Google search. foosion shows you how: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....ndpost&p=381702 This post has been edited by TBeck: Apr 12 2006, 20:23 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Apr 29 2006, 11:18
Post
#2
|
|
|
TAK Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1043 Joined: 1-April 06 Member No.: 29051 |
V0.05 is done
Changes: - Preset FASTEST is gone. The new FAST preset achieves the same speed on my system and does this with only a small decrease in compression efficiency (maximum 25 percent of the difference between old FAST and FASTEST). - Preset HIGH is 40 percent faster on my system. - Preset HIGH activates the option "Bitcoder / Optimize choice". - Preset INSANE uses frame partition resolution 256 and the new encoder option "BitCoder / Optimize Partition". - Modification of the window function used by "Apply Window". Might help with some problem files... - Selection of a preset doesn't affect the debug options in the encoder options dialog anymore. - Select the new debug option "No output" to encode without generating files. - Redesign of the dialogue options for frame partitioning. - Error in BitCoder fixed, which sometimes generated errors in the file stream. - Working data of the decoder was not properly aligned. The fix can improve decoding performance on some systems. - Clean up of source code. Could give new errors... - File format changed! Not done: - Speed optimization of Frame Partition Calculator resolution 256, which is much slower than 128. Unfortunately my new algorithm didn't work well. Release: I hope to send the new version to the following testers within the next hours: Destroid guruboolez Josef Pohm Shade[ST] Synthetic Soul Only reason for this selection: I haven't heard from the other testers within the last 10 days and i don't want to fill their mail box with new versions they possibly currently don't need. Any of them can sent me an email anytime, and i will sent the current version. What could be tested: The performance of the new implementations of the presets FAST, HIGH and INSANE might have changed. Apply window should hurt less on the rare problem files. Plans for V 0.06: - Implementation of a simple command line version. - Possibly some further assembler optimization to speed up especially preset HIGH. All optimizations in V0.05 were algorithmic. - More clean ups of my source code. Not really interesting for the tests. Thomas This post has been edited by TBeck: Apr 29 2006, 11:20 |
|
|
|
TBeck Yalac - Comparisons Apr 10 2006, 07:30
Synthetic Soul My results can be found at the following address:
... Apr 11 2006, 18:05
onthejazz QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Apr 11 2006, 12:0... Apr 12 2006, 04:52
Destroid I had issues with the inability for Yalac to accep... Apr 12 2006, 03:22
Synthetic Soul Comparison now includes Yalac Fastest.Summary of e... Apr 12 2006, 22:09
Destroid These are benchmarks with Yalac 0.03 with two albu... Apr 13 2006, 21:54
TBeck QUOTE (Destroid @ Apr 13 2006, 10:54 PM) ... Apr 13 2006, 22:40
Destroid Test #3 - LP recorded to cassette, includes vinyl ... Apr 18 2006, 01:13
Shade[ST] Destroid's results prove that YALAC is the bes... Apr 18 2006, 01:21
Destroid QUOTE ' date='Apr 18 2006, 12:21 AM' p... Apr 18 2006, 02:56
Synthetic Soul Garf posted some suggestions for "presets... Apr 18 2006, 09:47
Destroid QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Apr 18 2006, 08:4... Apr 18 2006, 11:09
TBeck QUOTE (Destroid @ Apr 18 2006, 12:09 PM) ... Apr 18 2006, 11:23
Destroid QUOTE (TBeck @ Apr 18 2006, 10:23 AM) I a... Apr 18 2006, 11:49
pest QUOTE My channel decorrelation obviously needs som... Apr 18 2006, 12:23
vinnie97 I'm still waiting for something to beat LA... Apr 18 2006, 10:13
Firon I'm really impressed, the fast compression rat... Apr 18 2006, 11:40
TBeck QUOTE (Firon @ Apr 18 2006, 12:40 PM) I... Apr 18 2006, 11:47
JB_ Hello, its my 1st post here.
Have you guys know th... Apr 18 2006, 12:01
[proxima] QUOTE (JB_ @ Apr 18 2006, 01:01 PM) Have ... Apr 18 2006, 12:18
JB_ QUOTE TTA was considered in previous tests by guru... Apr 18 2006, 16:31
Synthetic Soul Following my comparison using 16bit 44.1KHz stereo... Apr 18 2006, 12:11
TBeck QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Apr 18 2006, 01:1... Apr 18 2006, 14:20
Synthetic Soul Not especially. Is there a compelling reason to i... Apr 18 2006, 16:42
Mo0zOoH TBeck,
Your compressor is actually a BOMB. Right ... Apr 18 2006, 18:20
Synthetic Soul Out of interest on my part TTA is now included whe... Apr 18 2006, 18:49
Shade[ST] QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Apr 18 2006, 01:4... Apr 18 2006, 19:13
Synthetic Soul Yes, that would be possible.
Another member previ... Apr 18 2006, 22:06
Shade[ST] That second method is evaluating the compresser... Apr 18 2006, 22:30
audiofreak QUOTE ' date='Apr 18 2006, 02:13 PM' p... Apr 19 2006, 00:43
Shade[ST] Good idea. Now make it Apr 19 2006, 01:19
audiofreak QUOTE ' date='Apr 18 2006, 08:19 PM' p... Apr 19 2006, 01:42
Synthetic Soul Well, OK, if anyone can suggest an algorithm that ... Apr 19 2006, 07:44
TBeck Current Progress
you may call it Tom's diary.... Apr 23 2006, 10:50
audiofreak Moderation: Removed unnecessary quote
This may so... Apr 23 2006, 15:19
TBeck QUOTE (audiofreak @ Apr 23 2006, 04:19 PM... Apr 24 2006, 02:43
Destroid At last, the first set of monural instrument track... Apr 24 2006, 18:11
TBeck Current Progress (V0.05)
In my last post i asked ... Apr 26 2006, 04:31
Synthetic Soul Cool, thanks for the update Thomas.
I thought I s... Apr 26 2006, 10:01
boombaard QUOTE (TBeck @ Apr 29 2006, 12:18 PM) V0.... Apr 29 2006, 22:58
guruboolez I have a question, related to the fact that I have... Apr 29 2006, 11:39
Destroid QUOTE (guruboolez @ Apr 29 2006, 10:39 AM... Apr 29 2006, 22:29
Supacon It's good to see that you're progressing r... Apr 29 2006, 18:41
TBeck QUOTE (Supacon @ Apr 29 2006, 07:41 PM) B... May 2 2006, 13:31
Shade[ST] Hello Thomas,
Do you think you could slightly int... May 2 2006, 15:07
TBeck QUOTE ' date='May 2 2006, 04:07 PM' po... May 2 2006, 15:38
Shade[ST] That should be fine.. if no filename is listed, ma... May 2 2006, 16:40
TBeck QUOTE ' date='May 2 2006, 05:40 PM' po... May 2 2006, 16:58
Shade[ST] Maybe add a target directory option, so that the d... May 2 2006, 18:23
Destroid The speed up in high mode is there.
CODE
Occult - ... Apr 30 2006, 03:07
TBeck QUOTE (Destroid @ Apr 30 2006, 04:07 AM) ... May 2 2006, 13:07
Destroid My $0.02 USD, I would like to avoid the wildc... May 2 2006, 22:28
Shade[ST] In that case, (infile | --all) (compression option... May 2 2006, 22:54
TBeck QUOTE (Destroid @ May 2 2006, 11:28 PM) M... May 2 2006, 22:55
Destroid QUOTE Would it be ok for now, if the file extensio... May 2 2006, 23:57

Synthetic Soul QUOTE (Destroid @ May 2 2006, 10:57 PM) T... May 3 2006, 09:55
Synthetic Soul QUOTE (TBeck @ May 2 2006, 09:55 PM) Quic... May 3 2006, 09:44
TBeck QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ May 3 2006, 10:44... May 3 2006, 14:25
TBeck Current Progress (V0.06)
Sorry if i should talk t... May 5 2006, 12:28
Shade[ST] Take your time if you should wish to, but I don... May 5 2006, 13:22
TBeck QUOTE ' date='May 5 2006, 02:22 PM' po... May 5 2006, 13:56
Synthetic Soul I'm not sure what the priority is for testing ... May 5 2006, 21:10
TBeck QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ May 5 2006, 10:10... May 5 2006, 22:18
Synthetic Soul QUOTE (TBeck @ May 5 2006, 10:18 PM) Henc... May 6 2006, 10:08

Shade[ST] @Synthetic soul : If you make your batch files ava... May 6 2006, 16:37
TBeck QUOTE (TBeck @ May 5 2006, 23:18) Most wo... May 10 2006, 13:21
TBeck V0.06 is done
Changes:
Compression efficiency an... May 12 2006, 15:37
Shade[ST] My exams are now done, I'd be glad to test the... May 12 2006, 16:31
Shade[ST] On SSE optimization :
CODE=== New test ===========... May 13 2006, 00:49
TBeck QUOTE ' date='May 13 2006, 01:49' post... May 13 2006, 01:33
Shade[ST] It seems my disk caching is quite unstable, then. ... May 13 2006, 01:48
TBeck QUOTE ' date='May 13 2006, 02:48' post... May 13 2006, 01:54
Shade[ST] These results are actually quite surprising, as th... May 13 2006, 02:06
TBeck QUOTE ' date='May 13 2006, 03:06' post... May 13 2006, 02:29
Shade[ST] Do the rounding errors mean that the encoding may ... May 13 2006, 02:38

TBeck QUOTE ' date='May 13 2006, 03:38' post... May 13 2006, 02:46
Hyp-X QUOTE (TBeck @ May 13 2006, 02:29) I am q... May 15 2006, 16:21
TBeck QUOTE (Hyp-X @ May 15 2006, 17:21) F... May 15 2006, 16:33
Destroid A quick comparison between the last two versions u... May 13 2006, 02:51
TBeck QUOTE (Destroid @ May 13 2006, 03:51) A q... May 13 2006, 03:03
Destroid Oops, keep forgetting the sustem specs. I fixed th... May 13 2006, 03:25
TBeck QUOTE (Destroid @ May 13 2006, 04:25) Oop... May 13 2006, 03:33
Synthetic Soul QUOTE (TBeck @ May 13 2006, 01:33) BTW: A... May 13 2006, 08:03
TBeck QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ May 13 2006, 09:0... May 13 2006, 12:52
Synthetic Soul I hacked the original comparison table to include ... May 15 2006, 11:09
TBeck QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ May 15 2006, 12:0... May 15 2006, 12:52
TBeck QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ May 15 2006, 12:0... May 15 2006, 13:41
Synthetic Soul QUOTE (TBeck @ May 15 2006, 13:41) Would ... May 15 2006, 15:26
TBeck QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ May 15 2006, 16:2... May 15 2006, 15:57
Synthetic Soul Yes, Fast is truely impressive. In the encoder se... May 15 2006, 16:09
TBeck QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ May 15 2006, 17:0... May 15 2006, 16:17
Synthetic Soul QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ May 15 2006, 16:0... May 15 2006, 18:35
Firon Fast mode is quite impressive in ratio and speed, ... May 15 2006, 18:53
TBeck QUOTE (Firon @ May 15 2006, 19:53) Fast m... May 15 2006, 19:45
Synthetic Soul I have just checked the MD5 hash of all decoded fi... May 15 2006, 22:20
audiofreak QUOTE (TBeck @ May 15 2006, 14:45) QUOTE ... May 16 2006, 03:14
TBeck QUOTE (audiofreak @ May 16 2006, 04:14) P... May 17 2006, 02:57
Shade[ST] QUOTE (TBeck @ May 16 2006, 21:57) BTW: W... May 17 2006, 05:58
Destroid I agree the speed aspect is a Yalac specialty.
Si... May 17 2006, 20:21![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 05:33 |