Yalac: Suggestions for an Alternative Name, Split from TopicID: 43289 |
![]() ![]() |
Yalac: Suggestions for an Alternative Name, Split from TopicID: 43289 |
Apr 4 2006, 08:01
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4732 Joined: 12-August 04 From: Exeter, UK Member No.: 16217 |
Please find below a list of all suggestions as of <see this post's last edit date>:
Suggested Names for Thomas Beck's New Audio Codec: TAK (Toms Audio K©ompression) - TBeck (here) YALAC (Yet Another Lossless Audio Compressor) - TBeck ATAK (Advanced...?) - towolf LAW (Lossless Audio Worker/Weapon/Wizard) - Latexx AP1 - foosion A1C - halb27 Crystal (Audio) *already taken* - kjoonlee YAA (Ye Audio Archiver) - Shade[ST] Diamond, Aquamarine - kjoonlee Clarity - jarsonic Talcum - towolf/foosion *.ION - archagon Sirena / *.SN, SODA, Aurora, Borealis - archagon Diamantine - pepoluan XLACS (Extreme Lossless Audio Compression Scheme) - MuncherOfSpleens Mozart('s Choice) - boombard/pepoluan TNT, Exploder - rutra80 Calf, Cala, Oidua Seyknom, Gorf Mitpo or COS (short for "Cedoc Oidua Sselssol") - elmar3rd HAc - boombaard YALE (Yet Another Lossless Encoder) - MuncherOfSpleens AFLA (April Fool's Lossless Audio) - Aspirant RELACS (Really Efficient Lossless Audio Compression Scheme) - lionalex YAC/YAK - kdo SAC (Superior Audio Compression) Null (Null: Ultimate LossLess), LaF (Lost and Found) - Cosmo Crystalline, AudioLattice, Kiite, Durova, and Llewella - kjoonlee Mozart, Bach, Beethoven, etc. - popoluan Mach *already taken* - stephanV Obsidian - Synthetic Soul BAA (Beck's Audio Archiver), Halcyon - senab The Beck's Experience - lazka TBEC (Thomas Beck's Experimental Codec), TBPAK, TBAA, TBAC - tycho TULAC (The User's Lossless Audio Codec) - Doktor Lorenz Sled (Simply a Lossless Encoder) - sh1leshk4 Zwip - sh1leshk4 Calia - Insolent SoundSqueeze or Songsqueeze, SonicSqueeze, SoniSqueeze /*.ssq, MusiComp - Supacon BACH (Brilliant Audio Compressor Handling), Amadeus - guruboolez BLA (Bitsquisher Lossless Audio) - slks SoundStuffer - Supacon Wavpress, Muzip, AudioZip/Auzip, HA1, Hydro - Badass01 Lyra, Terpsichore, Aria - cheerow Lambda - Insolent Lyracal - jido Gumbo / *.gum, Zapper / *.zap - kanak HELAC (High Efficiency Lossless Audio Compression/Codec), CAWAR (Compress Audio With Amazing Ratio) - jmartis Stenosound - foosion Pure Wave Touch - urak LACN (Lossless Audio Codec for the Needy), OLAC (Obsessed Lossless Audio Codec) - Madman2003 Optimized Audio / *.OA, Optimized Lossless Audio (Compression) *.OLAC - unfortunateson Gliste, Glissando - kjoonlee ClearSound, ClearAudio, Clair/Claire - kjoonlee Orchestra, Orkhestra, Orchestrion - monkey lord Thanks to Supacon for taking the time to compile the initial list. This post has been edited by Synthetic Soul: Jun 5 2006, 15:07 |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 08:15
Post
#2
|
|
|
TAK Developer Group: Developer Posts: 887 Joined: 1-April 06 Member No.: 29051 |
QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Apr 4 2006, 09:01 AM) Firstly, YALAC is a really bad name, because it sounds like an ALAC derivative. The acronym is cheesy as well. Even if this is a temporary name you may be unnecessarily confusing the issue. Secondly, wouldn't it be pretty easy to write a small app to simply remove the first 44 (header) bytes from a WAVE file? Or is it not that simple? I don't really understand the RIFF chunk thing, so maybe I'm just being dumb. It's been known. Anyway, I'm itching to take a look at your encoder. It will take a lot to drag me away from WavPack, but I'm always interested in seeing new apps. I've been following your other thread, and it seems you've impressed. Edit: BTW, if you are only looking for a few dedicated testers I'm probably not your man. I'm happy to wait for a more general release. Sorry, but I'm just too busy for some serious testing. I'm more than happy to encode a bunch of files and verify them using some provided tool though. Yes, it's not a good name. I didn't have time to think about a good one. It would be easy to write an app to remove (at least a simple) wave header. But actually i wanted some independent testers and you couldn't call them so if i provided the testing tools. Thanks for your interest Thomas |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 08:54
Post
#3
|
|
|
TAK Developer Group: Developer Posts: 887 Joined: 1-April 06 Member No.: 29051 |
QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Apr 4 2006, 09:01 AM) Firstly, YALAC is a really bad name, because it sounds like an ALAC derivative. The acronym is cheesy as well. Even if this is a temporary name you may be unnecessarily confusing the issue. You are so right. It's really a bad name! This wrong association to ALAC is a big mistake! I hope, that i will find a better name soon.... Thomas |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 12:12
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 57 Joined: 2-April 03 Member No.: 5795 |
QUOTE Yalac May I suggest ATAK as a working title? ‘A’ like Advanced, you know... |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 12:25
Post
#5
|
|
|
TAK Developer Group: Developer Posts: 887 Joined: 1-April 06 Member No.: 29051 |
QUOTE (towolf @ Apr 4 2006, 01:12 PM) Sounds really good! But sounds also a bit like ATTAC (Association pour une Taxation des Transactions financières pour l'Aide aux Citoyens). Sigh... It seems to be very hard to find some good sounding acronym, which isn't allready in use. But thanks Thomas |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 12:37
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 57 Joined: 2-April 03 Member No.: 5795 |
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 12:43
Post
#7
|
|
|
TAK Developer Group: Developer Posts: 887 Joined: 1-April 06 Member No.: 29051 |
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 13:21
Post
#8
|
|
|
A/V Moderator Group: Members Posts: 858 Joined: 12-May 03 From: Finland Member No.: 6557 |
How bout LAW, Lossless Audio Worker/Weapon/Wizard/WTF..
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 13:23
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Group: FB2K Moderator (Donating) Posts: 3809 Joined: 24-February 03 Member No.: 5153 |
Perhaps it isn't such a good idea to force yourself to find an acronym. Given the nature of the thing you are trying to name, you would probably end up using two or more of the letters T (from your name), A (from audio), L (from lossless) and C (from codec). There just isn't such a large variety of acronyms you can form from these without using unusual word orders. I think Tony Robinson deserves credit for not using an acronym to name his format (Shorten).
It might be worth to base the name on something that inspired you, or - this is not a totally serious suggestion Just hoping to loosen up your mind. This post has been edited by foosion: Apr 4 2006, 13:24 -------------------- http://foosion.foobar2000.org/ - my components for foobar2000
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 13:44
Post
#10
|
|
|
TAK Developer Group: Developer Posts: 887 Joined: 1-April 06 Member No.: 29051 |
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 13:47
Post
#11
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1744 Joined: 9-October 05 From: Dormagen, Germany Member No.: 25015 |
I like the April 1 idea.
How about A1C (April 1 codec)? -------------------- lossyWAV -P --altpreset | FLAC -8 (350 kbps)
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 14:03
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1334 Joined: 31-January 04 Member No.: 11664 |
|
|
|
|
Apr 5 2006, 06:39
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2519 Joined: 25-July 02 From: South Korea Member No.: 2782 |
There are many ways to name things.
-------------------- http://blacksun.ivyro.net/vorbis/vorbisfaq.htm
|
|
|
|
Apr 5 2006, 06:44
Post
#14
|
|
|
TAK Developer Group: Developer Posts: 887 Joined: 1-April 06 Member No.: 29051 |
|
|
|
|
Apr 5 2006, 06:49
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1182 Joined: 19-May 05 From: Montreal, Canada Member No.: 22144 |
Crystal is taken by more than one piece of software. Here's a trick : google "INSERT_NAME_HERE" download
YAA download is fine. Crystal download has VST instruments, GM patches and a video player... |
|
|
|
Apr 5 2006, 06:53
Post
#16
|
|
|
TAK Developer Group: Developer Posts: 887 Joined: 1-April 06 Member No.: 29051 |
|
|
|
|
Apr 5 2006, 06:54
Post
#17
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2519 Joined: 25-July 02 From: South Korea Member No.: 2782 |
I didn't know about that. Then how about Crystal Audio, Diamond, or Aquamarine?
-------------------- http://blacksun.ivyro.net/vorbis/vorbisfaq.htm
|
|
|
|
Apr 5 2006, 20:19
Post
#18
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 180 Joined: 30-September 01 From: C-ville, VA Member No.: 83 |
Call it "Clarity."
Crystal Audio is the name of some audio drivers and an audio chipset. This post has been edited by jarsonic: Apr 5 2006, 20:27 |
|
|
|
Apr 5 2006, 20:29
Post
#19
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1182 Joined: 19-May 05 From: Montreal, Canada Member No.: 22144 |
|
|
|
|
Apr 5 2006, 20:39
Post
#20
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 180 Joined: 30-September 01 From: C-ville, VA Member No.: 83 |
QUOTE Yes, but one is a band, one is a material for braces, and the only software (4 hits down) is teacher software for developing lesson plans and recording class attendance. I don't think there would be any confusion. This post has been edited by jarsonic: Apr 5 2006, 20:41 |
|
|
|
Apr 5 2006, 20:43
Post
#21
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1182 Joined: 19-May 05 From: Montreal, Canada Member No.: 22144 |
Diamond will be wayyyy overtaken. However, I really like Aquamarine, and that one seems free. Plus, it can make a nice logo.
[edit]Actually, ACrystal Encoder would look nice, too[/edit] This post has been edited by Shade[ST]: Apr 5 2006, 20:46 |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2006, 12:34
Post
#22
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 57 Joined: 2-April 03 Member No.: 5795 |
Perhaps it isn't such a good idea to force yourself to find an acronym. Given the nature of the thing you are trying to name, you would probably end up using two or more of the letters T (from your name), A (from audio), L (from lossless) and C (from codec). There just isn't such a large variety of acronyms you can form from these without using unusual word orders. I think Tony Robinson deserves credit for not using an acronym to name his format (Shorten). Here we go again: Talcum What ‘u’ and ‘m’ stand for is down to your discretion, maybe u = unpublished. In the end you’re not yet marketing a brand name, do you? Personally, I wouldn't call something I had written “Crystal”. But I would neither call my daughter “Lolita”. This post has been edited by towolf: Apr 6 2006, 12:35 |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2006, 04:06
Post
#23
|
|
![]() Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81 |
Call it "Clarity." Crystal Audio is the name of some audio drivers and an audio chipset. SonicFoundry (now Sony) already came up with a technology called Perfect Clarity Audio (PCA) - a lossless codec. -------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2006, 06:41
Post
#24
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 180 Joined: 30-September 01 From: C-ville, VA Member No.: 83 |
|
|
|
|
Apr 7 2006, 07:09
Post
#25
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 104 Joined: 27-February 05 From: Silicon Valley Member No.: 20184 |
*.ION, perhaps?
How about "Sirena"? (*.SN) (Russian for "siren") SODA, maybe? (Same Objective -- Different Algorithm) "Aurora?" "Borealis?" This post has been edited by archagon: Apr 7 2006, 07:25 |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd November 2009 - 03:00 |