neroAacEnc.exe and 6ch encoding efficiency ... ? |
neroAacEnc.exe and 6ch encoding efficiency ... ? |
May 5 2006, 23:15
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 28 Joined: 17-April 04 Member No.: 13559 |
I have little ac3 6ch 448 Kbps. I make these convertions:
file wav 6 chanels 6ch.wav file wav 2 chanels 2ch.wav (default matrix 6ch->2ch conversion for BS) six files wav FR.wav, FL.wav, C.wav, LFE.wav, SR.wav and SL.wav 1) Convertion with neroAacEnc.exe I use this command line for all wav file neroAacEnc.exe -q 0.3 -lc -if input.wav -of output.mp4 and I find these size for each mp4 files 2ch done 2497 Ko and 114 Kbps 6h done 8764 Ko FL done 1574 Ko FR done 1569 Ko C done 1567 Ko LFE done 725 Ko SL done 1481 Ko SR done 1533 Ko well it's really curious: - same quality level for individual chanel done less bitrate than 6ch conversion (8.32 Mo vs 8.55 Mo) - for same quality level bitrate for 6ch and 2ch sould be simple scalling something like between x2.0-x2.5 ... here it's 3.5 2) Convertion with FAAC.exe I use this command line for all wav file faac.exe input.wav -o output.mp4 --tns -q 100 and I find these size for each mp4 files 2ch done 2552 Ko and 116 Kbps 6h done 6559 Ko FL done 1212 Ko FR done 1211 Ko C done 844 Ko LFE done 2497 Ko SL done 1233 Ko SR done 1240 Ko well here it's normal: - same quality level for individual chanel done more bitrate than 6ch conversion (7.00 Mo vs 6.40 Mo) - for same quality level bitrate for 6ch and 2ch sould be simple scaling something like between x2.0-x2.5 ... here it's 2.57 If quality level is the same for each encoding (1.0, 2.0, 5.1 ... etc) then bitrate for q 0.3 6ch file should be in 5000-6500 Ko interal. Chanel coupling seem work for 2.0 but not for 5.1. Bug for multichanel or different quality level ... ??? This post has been edited by Sagittaire: May 6 2006, 02:31 |
|
|
|
![]() |
May 6 2006, 00:44
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 56 Joined: 9-April 06 Member No.: 29317 |
-q 0.3 is almost 70kbs, and i faac q 100 is about 120kbs correct me if i wrong. 70 is to small for 5.1 encoding and 120 is is normal like you say. So for HE-AAC is only recommend to use 96-192 for LC 192-max. I think in that case and 2pass can't help with that small bitrates
This post has been edited by Dzamburu: May 6 2006, 01:05 |
|
|
|
Sagittaire neroAacEnc.exe and 6ch encoding efficiency ... ? May 5 2006, 23:15
kwanbis http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....ndpos... May 5 2006, 23:53
kwanbis QUOTE (kwanbis @ May 5 2006, 10:53 PM) ht... May 6 2006, 01:48
Sagittaire QUOTE (Dzamburu @ May 5 2006, 03:44 PM) -... May 6 2006, 01:06
Sagittaire Well I try with the old nero aac version (aac.dll ... May 6 2006, 02:22
Garf The reason is simply that the -q levels behave a ... May 6 2006, 08:48
benc QUOTE (Garf @ May 6 2006, 08:48 AM) The r... May 6 2006, 10:24
Garf Yes, that's probably the best thing to do (for... May 6 2006, 10:41
Dzamburu Old Nero 6/7 have most terrible quality in 5.1 enc... May 6 2006, 11:13
Sagittaire QUOTE Making these kind of crazy hypotheses each t... May 6 2006, 12:05
Dzamburu QUOTE You want my ac3 source ... lol
Be carefull L... May 6 2006, 12:12
Sagittaire QUOTE (Dzamburu @ May 6 2006, 03:12) QUOT... May 6 2006, 12:59![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 07:13 |