Nero AAC, listening test :-) |
Nero AAC, listening test :-) |
 Nov 27 2002, 13:19
Post
#1
|
|
|
Nero MPEG4 developer Group: Developer Posts: 1466 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 8  |
Hi, - before releasing final version I would like to hear audiophiles opinion about two noise allocation strategies we can use.
These two versions will be called "build_a" and "build_b" I've packed some of the essential "codec killers" samples in build_a.zip and build_b.zip - originals could be easily found on hydrogenaduio and mp3dev  http://www.psytel-research.co.yu/test/ BUILD A: http://www.psytel-research.co.yu/test/build_a.zip BUILD B: http://www.psytel-research.co.yu/test/build_b.zip Which one is better, and for which samples? Files are CBR - 80, 96 and 128 kbps - 32 and 44.1 kHz sampling rate - ADIF AAC format This post has been edited by Ivan Dimkovic: Nov 27 2002, 13:21 |
 |
 
|
 |
|
Jun 4 2003, 19:47
Post
#2
|
|
 Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81 |
QUOTE (ff123 @ Jun 4 2003 - 03:23 PM) What's this test all about? Obviously I know that it's an AAC test. Is it about Ivan's original request for listening responses or is it something else? Just curious. Since AAC has been getting quite some news coverage lately (Apple, AOL, iRiver...), some people and I thought it would be interesting to do a test to see what codec performs better at 128kbps (whch seems to be a good compromise for portable usage and DSL streaming). Besides, I plan to take the winner and throw it against Vorbis, Lame, MPC and FhG MP3 in another test. (Maybe including WMA and/or Atrac3 also) -------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
|
|
|
Ivan Dimkovic Nero AAC, listening test :-) Nov 27 2002, 13:19
Dibrom I moved the thread to the news section.. it'll... Nov 27 2002, 15:23 Dibrom Result So Far:
Castanets - 44.1khz@128kbps - Buil... Nov 27 2002, 15:33 SK1 OH YEAH!
OK, starting to test. This thread wil... Nov 27 2002, 17:57 guruboolez ··· gURuBoOleZZ results (work in progress) ···
I... Nov 27 2002, 18:40 SK1 Forget ABXing, what's the use?? It's not l... Nov 27 2002, 19:07 guruboolez QUOTE (SK1 @ Nov 27 2002 - 07:07 PM)Forget AB... Nov 27 2002, 19:13 SK1 Fair enough ... Nov 27 2002, 19:14 Mac I wish I could help more, I don't have the ear... Nov 28 2002, 11:55 JohnV What bothers me is the NIN-becoming sample and its... Nov 28 2002, 13:08 Mac I noticed the start of the NIN sample was horrible... Nov 28 2002, 16:15 wildboar The beginning of the NIN clip should have a consta... Nov 28 2002, 18:45 JohnV QUOTE (Mac @ Nov 28 2002 - 05:15 PM)I noticed... Nov 28 2002, 22:21 smok3 44 khz/128 kbit:
-----------
velvet_44khz_128_aac... Dec 1 2002, 03:45 JohnV As Ivan said, all the originals can be found in th... Dec 1 2002, 04:19 smok3 tnx johnV i found most, which one is 41_30s ? (thi... Dec 1 2002, 04:32 JohnV QUOTE (smok3 @ Dec 1 2002 - 05:32 AM)tnx john... Dec 1 2002, 07:58 Ivan Dimkovic Ok, attack issues with NIN_becoming.wav should be... Dec 10 2002, 15:42 Phobos OHH BOY, THOSE NEW SAMPLES ARE MAD!!! ... Dec 10 2002, 20:14 guruboolez It's hard to find a difference between 2.30 sa... Dec 10 2002, 20:57 Ivan Dimkovic There is a big difference, at least with NIN_beco... Dec 10 2002, 21:32 guruboolez I will try.
I tried again velved, properly decoded... Dec 10 2002, 21:43 guruboolez Confirmed. (I'm not dreaming : there is no NIN... Dec 10 2002, 23:13 menno QUOTE (guruboolez @ Dec 10 2002 - 09:43 PM)Th... Dec 10 2002, 23:15 guruboolez I downloaded this file :
http://www.inf.ufpr.br/~... Dec 10 2002, 23:27 menno Yes, everything is affected. I'll make sure Ro... Dec 10 2002, 23:32 guruboolez Thanks.
I used CoolEdit for one practical reason. ... Dec 10 2002, 23:56 menno Ok, new CoolEdit filter is now available from Rare... Dec 11 2002, 09:30 ak QUOTE (menno @ Dec 11 2002 - 10:30 AM)I also ... Dec 11 2002, 10:16 guruboolez Thanks, it works fine now.
Glad to see that I... Dec 11 2002, 14:03 ff123 QUOTE (guruboolez @ Dec 11 2002 - 05:03 AM)Th... Dec 11 2002, 16:45 rjamorim I'm going through a similar problem here. Only... Jun 3 2003, 01:42 ff123 rjamorim,
Regarding your recent inquiry (2 June 0... Jun 3 2003, 15:40 rjamorim I did another test.
This time, I used another sam... Jun 3 2003, 21:44 ff123 QUOTE (rjamorim @ Jun 3 2003 - 12:44 PM)I did... Jun 3 2003, 22:04 rjamorim QUOTE (ff123 @ Jun 3 2003 - 06:04 PM)P.S., if... Jun 3 2003, 22:16 ff123 roberto,
I got your file.
I verified that when I... Jun 4 2003, 05:22 rjamorim Great news, ff123. Thanks a lot for taking a look ... Jun 4 2003, 05:37 ff123 QUOTE (rjamorim @ Jun 3 2003 - 08:37 PM)Great... Jun 4 2003, 05:52 ff123 BTW, it looks like that field is redundant, and th... Jun 4 2003, 06:00 rjamorim QUOTE (ff123 @ Jun 4 2003 - 01:52 AM)The prob... Jun 4 2003, 06:08 menno Hello ff123,
Yes FAAD2 used to have a little bug ... Jun 4 2003, 09:55 rjamorim QUOTE (menno @ Jun 4 2003 - 05:55 AM)But of c... Jun 4 2003, 18:21 ff123 QUOTE (rjamorim @ Jun 4 2003 - 09:21 AM)If th... Jun 4 2003, 19:23 ff123 Cool. How many samples are you going to try? Sou... Jun 4 2003, 20:16 rjamorim QUOTE (ff123 @ Jun 4 2003 - 04:16 PM)Cool.... Jun 4 2003, 20:31 Tripwire If you take WMA9, be sure to use both Std and Pro. Jun 4 2003, 21:33 rjamorim QUOTE (Tripwire @ Jun 4 2003 - 05:33 PM)If yo... Jun 4 2003, 21:39 spoon How do Codecs with VBR fit in with 128Kbps? to be ... Jun 4 2003, 22:25 rjamorim QUOTE (spoon @ Jun 4 2003 - 06:25 PM)How do C... Jun 4 2003, 22:33 guruboolez QUOTE (rjamorim @ Jun 4 2003 - 09:39 PM)QUOTE... Jun 4 2003, 22:41 rjamorim QUOTE (guruboolez @ Jun 4 2003 - 06:41 PM)The... Jun 4 2003, 22:52 spoon The profile options for WMApro are 2 channel only ... Jun 4 2003, 23:04
ff123 QUOTE (rjamorim @ Jun 4 2003 - 01:52 PM)QUOTE... Jun 4 2003, 23:13 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 18:26 |
