IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

10 Pages V  « < 8 9 10  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
List of recommended LAME compiles, Discussion
magic75
post Mar 11 2004, 09:59
Post #226





Group: Members
Posts: 511
Joined: 2-December 02
Member No.: 3959



Well, 3.95 is faster than 3.90 so that observation is fully correct. Using presets with the 3.90 dll is difficult, you may need a special build for that. Don't really know much about that, but the nice thing with 3.95 is that the presets have been set so that they are used by default. For instance you can access the VBR presets with the -V option. Do a search and you will find the info.

There isn't really any "issues" with using the presets with other versions than 3.90.3. But as far as we know (yet) 3.90.3 is the recommended/best version. If you for some reason need to use another version, the presets are still the way to go.

BTW, have you tried dbpoweramp? It uses the dll and it can access the presets from what I can see. Don't know how it works though.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john33
post Mar 11 2004, 10:13
Post #227


xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 3726
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Bracknell, UK
Member No.: 111



The lame_enc.dll included in the standard 3.90.3 download at Rarewares supports all the usual presets, including the medium presets. The only issue is whether the application that uses the dll also allows use of them.


--------------------
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
leif
post Mar 12 2004, 06:32
Post #228





Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 23-February 04
Member No.: 12220



thanks all, Hard Disk Ogg is the only recorder I've found with a good range of presets and the author says it works well with the 3.95.1 dll - on the Pentium 111-600 I use for recording the 3.95.1 dll also uses less than 50% CPU compared to over 80% with 3.90.1 dll with the standard preset (100% with extreme).

So I guess I'll record with 3.95.1 but use the recommended 3.90.3 lame.exe with alt-preset standard for other encoding ... I assume there's no problem putting both the 3.95.1 dll and the 3.90.3 exe together in the system32 directory (hope that's not a dumb question)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
OCedHrt
post Jun 24 2004, 23:16
Post #229





Group: Members
Posts: 57
Joined: 7-January 04
Member No.: 11015



QUOTE (RyanVM @ Jan 12 2004, 11:47 PM)
I'm getting the following error when trying to replaygain:
file info update failure on pipes3951.wav

and similar for all files I'm trying to replaygain

A bit late now, but even if it gives you the error the replay gain is still in effect at least for that foobar session. I can run replay-gain on a cd and then convert it to mp3 and have the replay gain in effect. Obviously it can't update the cd.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rjamorim
post Aug 13 2004, 01:24
Post #230


Rarewares admin


Group: Members
Posts: 7515
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Brazil
Member No.: 81



Hello.

I would like to ask that the link at the first post in this thread be replaced with this one:
http://www.rarewares.org/dancer/dancer.php?f=1

That will help load the balance evenly among RareWares' mirrors.

Thank-you.

Regards;

Roberto.

This post has been edited by rjamorim: Aug 13 2004, 01:31


--------------------
Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter
post Aug 13 2004, 01:46
Post #231





Group: Admin
Posts: 3269
Joined: 30-September 01
Member No.: 84



Done.


--------------------
This job would be great if it wasn't for the users.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Garf
post Sep 25 2004, 12:09
Post #232


Server Admin


Group: Admin
Posts: 4853
Joined: 24-September 01
Member No.: 13



Given that one of the other sticky threads lists 3.96.1 as recommended for low to mid bitrate VBR, which is important for many people, I fail to understand why this thread has no 3.96.1 compile in the first post.

(And yes, I was too lazy to read the entire discussion, it just makes no sense to me)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
shafff
post Oct 5 2005, 19:06
Post #233





Group: Members
Posts: 36
Joined: 27-May 03
From: Kiev, Ukraine
Member No.: 6844



Encspot says that 3.97 -V0 encoded file has 58% ss (joint stereo) blocks, when the same file, but 3.96 ape encoded, has 73%
3.97 -V2 and -V1 gives only 7%-10% ss blocks on that file (Madonna - Secret).

Is it OK?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
beto
post Oct 5 2005, 19:16
Post #234





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 713
Joined: 8-July 04
From: Sao Paulo
Member No.: 15173



Yes, if you don't hear any obvious problem with the samples. And i think that ss stands for stereo frames rather than joint stereo, but I believe that should be confirmed by someone else that's more used to encspot than me...


--------------------
http://volutabro.blogspot.com
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
shafff
post Oct 5 2005, 19:54
Post #235





Group: Members
Posts: 36
Joined: 27-May 03
From: Kiev, Ukraine
Member No.: 6844



joint stereo = ss + ms

actually i cant hear any difference on my PC even between 160 and 192 smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
echo
post Jun 9 2006, 23:34
Post #236





Group: Members
Posts: 165
Joined: 31-January 04
Member No.: 11670



The recommended compile at http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=Lame_Compiles is currently lame 3.97b2, but the linux compile from the same page identifies itself as lame 3.97b1. Is there any 3.97b2 linux compile available? I didn't find anything on the rarewares page either.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

10 Pages V  « < 8 9 10
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th April 2014 - 08:15