Transform coding versus Subband Coding |
Transform coding versus Subband Coding |
Dec 16 2002, 12:39
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 1245 Joined: 16-December 02 From: Australia Member No.: 4097 |
Hi everyone, I'm a newbie here so hope these (2) questions aren't too stupid.
I've read here that Ogg Vorbis uses transform coding (MDCT) so it is in the family of coders such as JPEG (for images) and MPEG (for video). First question (a bit off the point): Can't seem to find a definite answer for this but is mp3 technically a subband coder, pseudo-subband coder, or pseudo-transform coder? Second question: Do you think transform coding is better than subband coding in audio? I myself dabble a bit in the area of image coding and read that the distortions incurred tend to be different between the two. Is this the case for audio as well? In this respect, does Ogg Vorbis being a transform coder have an advantage/disadvantage over the various subband audio coders out there? I'm a newbie so no laughing please |
|
|
|
QuantumKnot Transform coding versus Subband Coding Dec 16 2002, 12:39
tangent JPEG (and MPEG video, I believe) use DCT, not MDCT... Dec 16 2002, 13:17
QuantumKnot Thanks for the correction. I've never delved... Dec 17 2002, 10:56
petracci QUOTE (QuantumKnot @ Dec 17 2002 - 11:56 AM)T... Dec 17 2002, 11:15
QuantumKnot Oh now I remember glancing at a paper about lapped... Dec 17 2002, 11:25
floyd The only way to find out either way is to test som... Dec 17 2002, 11:31
QuantumKnot A few weeks ago, I had the privilege of attending ... Apr 2 2003, 06:35
superdumprob Interesting stuff QuantumKnot. Apr 25 2003, 14:42![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 17:31 |