AAC vs. MP3 tests @128 - Test #1 |
AAC vs. MP3 tests @128 - Test #1 |
Sep 25 2001, 18:33
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 2797 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 6 |
Hey Ivan, just started doing your AAC vs. MP3 @128 Test #1. For those who dont know, below is the test announcement. But, anyway, it seems that 16 samples to evaluate (12 different) is a bit too much even for me to evaluate "correctly"..
Are you really going to include this many samples in test #2 also and 30sec samples? How many results you have got so far? Just did the first part of the test, second one to go... QUOTE Ivan Dimkovic wrote:[b]
Hi All Ok, WavRate is almost finished, only thing that needs to be done is multiple test analysis (but project file is already compatible with that). What's new: - Better look&feel Small glitches corrected, like playback info - Automatic randomization of the items prior to testing - Slider selection of the range of playback - Automatic encryption of the output files (security purposes) You can download wavrate from: http://www.psytel-research.co.yu/downloads/wavrate.exe Ok, so first test iteration will be castanets test: http://www.audiocoding.com/listening_tests...tanets_test.zip Codec info for the Test #1 could be found here: http://www.psytel-research.co.yu/downlods/...s_codecinfo.zip This zip file is enrypted - I will supply everyone with the password when listening test #1 is finished. Please unpack those LPAC files into the same directory and open those .wrf files from the wavrate. You can rank each codec with mark ranging from 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent) in 0.1 increments. Please perform those tests carefully, and comment your results for each item as much as you can - tell me what do you think what's wrong with particular test item and why you think it deserves particular mark. Please send saved results (File/Save...) to: listening_tests@psytel-research.co.yu - subject "Castanets Test" Next test will incorporate larger sample (30 seconds) -------------------- Juha Laaksonheimo
|
|
|
|
JohnV AAC vs. MP3 tests @128 - Test #1 Sep 25 2001, 18:33
Ivan Dimkovic Maybe I will reduce number of codecs to 6, with hi... Sep 25 2001, 18:38
JohnV Hmm, pretty long way to go until 30 people has don... Sep 25 2001, 19:11
Ivan Dimkovic As soon as I figure out what went wrong with the e... Sep 26 2001, 07:53
TrNSZ Have you looked into using pgplib? It's portable ... Sep 26 2001, 09:37
Ivan Dimkovic I'll take a look at pgplib - actually, I used MD5 ... Sep 26 2001, 11:50
ff123 Well, I peered into the test a bit (after I took i... Sep 26 2001, 17:31
Ivan Dimkovic Hmm... deviations between listeners are quite big.... Sep 26 2001, 22:52
ff123 QUOTE Hmm... deviations between listeners are quit... Sep 26 2001, 23:14
YouriP I downloaded wavrate and tried the listening test,... Sep 26 2001, 23:37
ff123 You have to unpac the files first. At least this ... Sep 27 2001, 03:45
YouriP Yup, you are correct ff123. It seems to work fine ... Sep 28 2001, 17:22
JohnV Ok, I submitted my results also. Well, in the end ... Sep 28 2001, 17:35
Garf Nice utilty. I had to figure out I had to decompre... Sep 29 2001, 23:38
ff123 Ivan,
How is the test coming along?
ff123 Oct 8 2001, 08:08
Ivan Dimkovic Ok, castanets test is over and it seems that FhG A... Oct 9 2001, 09:51
Ivan Dimkovic ...CASTANETS 128 TEST...
FRIEDMAN version 1.10 (S... Oct 9 2001, 21:13
ff123 Too bad only nine listeners.
Which wav files corr... Oct 9 2001, 21:47
Ivan Dimkovic Ah.. yes...
5006933F-DCCD-4c82-A7EF-E9E9BE22A78D ... Oct 9 2001, 22:00
layer3maniac QUOTE Critical significance of Fisher's LSD analys... Oct 9 2001, 22:16
Dibrom QUOTE Originally posted by ff123
Hmmm. How ... Oct 10 2001, 12:08
jianxin yan hi, ivan
when do you want to end the test?
now, ... Oct 10 2001, 16:48![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 08:14 |