Why no Vorbis 2-pass? |
  |
Why no Vorbis 2-pass? |
 Aug 25 2006, 01:27
Post
#51
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 484 Joined: 8-January 06 From: Earth Member No.: 26978  |
2pass encoding is only usefull to speed up the process of getting the most quality out of a given file size (I say 'speed up' because trial & error is the alternative method).
I have yet to see any circumstance where 2pass audio encoding is more usefull than 1pass vbr  Does anybody know of any at all? For video encoding 2pass is very usefull, since the trial & error method is extremely time consuming. -------------------- Vorbis-q0-lowpass99
lame3.93.1-q5-V9-k-nspsytune |
 |
 
|
|
Aug 25 2006, 02:00
Post
#52
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 289 Joined: 12-May 03 From: The Hague Member No.: 6555 |
What about listening tests where a specific average bitrate for the collection of samples may be desired?
-------------------- Veni Vidi Vorbis.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 25 2006, 08:21
Post
#53
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 58 Joined: 24-October 05 Member No.: 25326 |
QUOTE (gameplaya15143 @ Aug 24 2006, 18:27)  I have yet to see any circumstance where 2pass audio encoding is more usefull than 1pass vbr Does anybody know of any at all? Rehuff can be used only with a two pass encoding (altought this is not the same two pass of video encoding, this is really a two pass). More infos on rehuff: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev...ust/018522.html |
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 22:53 |
