What resampler would you recommend besides SSRC v1.30?, (as SSRC won't work in my file) |
![]() ![]() |
What resampler would you recommend besides SSRC v1.30?, (as SSRC won't work in my file) |
Mar 27 2007, 01:01
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 96 Joined: 8-May 04 Member No.: 13957 |
A long time ago and after some careful lurking, I collected some adequate settings to use in SSRC:
CODE ssrc.exe --rate 48000 --twopass --dither 1 --pdf 1 input.wav output.wav if further processing is needed, I'd add --bits 24 to it. Now, the File I currently have to work on has a sample rate of 11026Hz as a result of slightly altering the framerate of its corresponding video. As expected, SSRC chokes on it. I wanted to know if you could recommend me something at least as good as SSRC with these settings for a case like this. |
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 01:30
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 484 Joined: 8-January 06 From: Earth Member No.: 26978 |
As expected, SSRC chokes on it. I would say that is unexpected Try just ssrc --rate 48000 in.wav out.wav edit: I tried this 11026->48000, and indeed it did choke. I would go get the audio off the original un-altered video and go from there. And always a good choice: foobar2000 This post has been edited by gameplaya15143: Mar 29 2007, 23:59 -------------------- Vorbis-q0-lowpass99
lame3.93.1-q5-V9-k-nspsytune |
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 04:55
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 96 Joined: 8-May 04 Member No.: 13957 |
As expected, SSRC chokes on it. I would say that is unexpected Try just ssrc --rate 48000 in.wav out.wav I would go get the audio off the original un-altered video and go from there. And always a good choice: foobar2000 I seem to recall a few threads in this forum where it was said SSRC can't deal with too big upsamples (like, say, 8x) or weird source rates like the 11026Hz of this file. Just to be certain, I tried your suggested settings, but those too didn't work. |
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 06:11
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 25 Joined: 23-July 02 From: Las Vegas, NV Member No.: 2762 |
Did you try dBpoweramp? Make sure to turn on the professional SRC option. It's worth a shot.
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 13:02
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 96 Joined: 8-May 04 Member No.: 13957 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 13:17
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 580 Joined: 4-January 03 From: Scotland Member No.: 4415 |
It's expensive, it's not real time, but it's the best. Voxengo R8Brain Pro - as recommended by Bob Katz :-p
http://www.voxengo.com/product/r8brainpro/ -------------------- http://www.animarecordings.com/
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 14:01
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81 |
-------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 14:31
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 31 Joined: 5-May 06 Member No.: 30424 |
Take a look at sox:
http://sox.sourceforge.net/ This document analyses the diffrent resample algorithms of sox: http://leute.server.de/wilde/resample.html |
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 14:41
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 211 Joined: 1-October 01 From: Lisbon, Portugal Member No.: 127 |
Another vote for SRC (the one rjamorim linked). You can read more about it here: http://www.mega-nerd.com/SRC/
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 21:43
Post
#10
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 96 Joined: 8-May 04 Member No.: 13957 |
It's good to read that it's a good replacement for SSRC. I was kinda wary to use it since (at least the Drop version) doesn't have much in the way of customization, but I fully trust you guys. Thanks for the advice
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 19:07 |