FLAC 1.2.1 released |
![]() ![]() |
FLAC 1.2.1 released |
Sep 17 2007, 02:10
Post
#1
|
|
|
FLAC Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1526 Joined: 27-February 02 Member No.: 1408 |
FLAC 1.2.1 is out, the major addition being support for all RIFF/AIFF metadata, including Broadcast Wave Format (BWF) via the new --keep-foreign-metadata option. There are many other small improvements and bug fixes; see the changelog entry for complete details.
|
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 02:15
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 232 Joined: 20-January 06 Member No.: 27228 |
Thanks Josh! I hope a Universal Mac version is due out soon
|
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 04:45
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 139 Joined: 23-December 05 Member No.: 26599 |
FLAC becomes better and better - compression rate and speed is growing, additional RIFF/AIFF metadata can be stored. For de'facto standard lossless codec (at least in open source world) it is great.
Good work, Josh, thank you very much. BTW, it's time to update wiki page of "Lossless comparison" and remove 'unable to support RIFF chunks' from cons. |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 06:35
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 204 Joined: 26-March 06 From: Edmonton, Canada Member No.: 28860 |
|
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 09:18
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 4-July 02 Member No.: 2477 |
Is the new option --keep-foreign-metadata recommended for files generated by EAC? I think it is only needed for WAV files with metainformation such as timestamp points etc used by Wavelab and other Sound-Editting apps.
|
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 10:32
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 63 Joined: 13-August 04 Member No.: 16237 |
Great work! For my purposes FLAC really is the most complete lossless codec available, thanks jcoalsen.
(a really minor gripe though: could the windows installer please ask me if I would like to have a desktop icon?) |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 11:50
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 826 Joined: 29-September 04 Member No.: 17374 |
|
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 12:26
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 560 Joined: 1-December 02 From: India Member No.: 3948 |
Thanks for the great work Josh!
However, I am not too sure what SF# 1764105 - "Fixed bug where importing non-CDDA cuesheets would cause an invalid lead-out track number" means. Can someone please tell me what this means in plain English? Also, is this a serious enough bug to warrant a trancode of all my FLAC images from v1.1.4 to v1.2.1? I am totally confused |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 12:49
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1150 Joined: 4-May 04 From: France Member No.: 13875 |
Read this post. Previously, when embedding a cue sheet in a flac file that was created from non-CD audio, the lead-out track number would be incorrect. Starting with this new version of FLAC, the lead-out track number for non-CD audio will always be 255.
You don't have to transcode anything unless you have such files. In other words, if your FLAC images are CD-DA rips (44.1 kHz, 16 bit, stereo), you're fine. This post has been edited by skamp: Sep 17 2007, 12:53 -------------------- caudec -c lossyTAK -q S *.flac
|
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 15:56
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 742 Joined: 27-May 02 From: Oslo, Norway Member No.: 2133 |
|
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 15:57
Post
#11
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 232 Joined: 20-January 06 Member No.: 27228 |
I wasn't sure what your URL for downloads of the Mac version was, but just found it in your profile:
http://homepage.mac.com/krmathis/ Thanks! Downloaded it... This post has been edited by goodnews: Sep 17 2007, 15:59 |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 16:54
Post
#12
|
|
|
FLAC Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1526 Joined: 27-February 02 Member No.: 1408 |
just got a report that if you use "flac --replay-gain" but no padding option, the resulting file will have a very small padding block. I'll upload a new installer soon, or the workaround is to use a -P option with your preferred amount of padding.
|
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 19:11
Post
#13
|
|
|
FLAC Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1526 Joined: 27-February 02 Member No.: 1408 |
uploaded new installer with --replay-gain fix here:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/flac/flac-1.2.1b.exe |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 19:50
Post
#14
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 57 Joined: 11-July 06 Member No.: 32807 |
Thanks for the new version.
Seems the problems reading WAVE_FORMAT_EXTENSIBLE headers by STDIN, repported in this post, are solved. |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 19:53
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 742 Joined: 27-May 02 From: Oslo, Norway Member No.: 2133 |
Josh. Is this a fix at source code level or part of the MS Windows installer package only?
Meaning, will we see a new source code tarball? By the way. I appreciate the work you put into this. Thanks! |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 21:25
Post
#16
|
|
|
FLAC Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1526 Joined: 27-February 02 Member No.: 1408 |
Josh. Is this a fix at source code level or part of the MS Windows installer package only? haven't decided on that yet, full releases are quite a pain. if other urgent bugs pop up I might. in the meantime you can pick up all urgent fixes to 1.2.1 via the maintenance branch, i.e. check out by branch tag FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1_MAINTENANCE_BRANCH
Meaning, will we see a new source code tarball? |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 21:30
Post
#17
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 232 Joined: 20-January 06 Member No.: 27228 |
Josh. Is this a fix at source code level or part of the MS Windows installer package only? haven't decided on that yet, full releases are quite a pain. if other urgent bugs pop up I might. in the meantime you can pick up all urgent fixes to 1.2.1 via the maintenance branch, i.e. check out by branch tag FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1_MAINTENANCE_BRANCHMeaning, will we see a new source code tarball? Josh, these releases might "be a pain", but having several 1.2.1 versions with different code branches and possible problems should not be allowed. I recommend you make the fixes 1.2.2 and not 1.2.1 branch. People need to rely on a version, and having bugs causes people to be leery to use that version I believe. Just my opinion. |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 22:05
Post
#18
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 742 Joined: 27-May 02 From: Oslo, Norway Member No.: 2133 |
haven't decided on that yet, full releases are quite a pain. if other urgent bugs pop up I might. in the meantime you can pick up all urgent fixes to 1.2.1 via the maintenance branch, i.e. check out by branch tag FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1_MAINTENANCE_BRANCH I see..WIll check out the maintenance branch, and follow closely in case you decide to put out a 1.2.1b tarball. |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2007, 05:21
Post
#19
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 139 Joined: 23-December 05 Member No.: 26599 |
|
|
|
|
Sep 18 2007, 11:44
Post
#20
|
|
![]() A/V Moderator Group: Moderator Posts: 1668 Joined: 30-April 02 From: Slovenia Member No.: 1922 |
--keep-foreign-metadata seems to be fine:
046335deef981b35f3227f0315cc9bc8 *file.wav 046335deef981b35f3227f0315cc9bc8 *file_decoded.wav a. should i expect any problems? b. what exactly is the latest cmd version? (i have extracted one from installer flac-1.2.1b.exe, is that the latest?) tnx -------------------- PANIC: CPU 1: Cache Error (unrecoverable - dcache data) Eframe = 0x90000000208cf3b8
NOTICE - cpu 0 didn't dump TLB, may be hung |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2007, 12:15
Post
#21
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 826 Joined: 29-September 04 Member No.: 17374 |
a. should i expect any problems? b. what exactly is the latest cmd version? (i have extracted one from installer flac-1.2.1b.exe, is that the latest?) a. This release is considered to be stable, so expect no problems b. Yes, the one from the installer is the latest. By the way, the only difference is a really small fix (use of the --replay-gain option caused no padding). |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2007, 12:45
Post
#22
|
|
![]() A/V Moderator Group: Moderator Posts: 1668 Joined: 30-April 02 From: Slovenia Member No.: 1922 |
egor, tnx, the problems with '--keep-foreign-metadata' is the question?
This post has been edited by smok3: Sep 18 2007, 12:45 -------------------- PANIC: CPU 1: Cache Error (unrecoverable - dcache data) Eframe = 0x90000000208cf3b8
NOTICE - cpu 0 didn't dump TLB, may be hung |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2007, 16:49
Post
#23
|
|
![]() Group: Banned Posts: 139 Joined: 21-March 07 Member No.: 41686 |
Thank you, Josh
|
|
|
|
Sep 18 2007, 17:08
Post
#24
|
|
![]() Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 2372 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 3 |
FLAC 1.2.1 is out, the major addition being support for all RIFF/AIFF metadata, including Broadcast Wave Format (BWF) via the new --keep-foreign-metadata option. There are many other small improvements and bug fixes; see the changelog entry for complete details. Not only thanks for your work on FLAC, this is also a textbook example of a good news post. I would like to see more news submissions like that from other people; brief and to the point. and remove 'unable to support RIFF chunks' from cons. Done. |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2007, 17:42
Post
#25
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 230 Joined: 21-February 05 Member No.: 20022 |
"RIFF/AIFF metadata, including Broadcast Wave Format (BWF) via the new --keep-foreign-metadata"
So can I use FLAC to compress wav files used in multitrack projects in programs like SONAR, Cubase, Pro Tools etc and maintain the time position data and stuff like that? This would be really great |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th June 2013 - 12:06 |