Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92, Audible differences with APS? |
Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92, Audible differences with APS? |
  Jan 16 2003, 16:03
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 524 Joined: 7-November 02 From: Gloucester, UK Member No.: 3716  |
oops, I always thought I had been using 3.90.2, but upon actually opening my eyes and checking, it seems I am using 3.92. I have swapped to 3.90.2, although I cannot tell one little difference whatsoever.
Is there any difference, audibly? -------------------- http://www.megalev.co.uk
|
 |
 
|
 |
|
Jan 16 2003, 16:26
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Developer Posts: 1679 Joined: 23-December 01 From: Germany Member No.: 731 |
There should be no audible difference, but maybe a small one in bitrate, since 3.92 uses different compilerflags.
dev0 -------------------- "To understand me, you'll have to swallow a world." Or maybe your words.
|
|
|
|
Lev Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92 Jan 16 2003, 16:03
RIV@NVX 3.92 is newer, 3.90.2 is older... I don't know... Jan 16 2003, 16:10 NeoRenegade Apparently the developpers have screwed something ... Jan 16 2003, 17:02 Gabriel QUOTE Apparently the developpers have screwed some... Jan 16 2003, 17:07 Lev What does the '???' mean?
Wrong noise sha... Jan 16 2003, 17:22 Daffy QUOTE (NeoRenegade @ Jan 16 2003 - 11:02 AM)A... Jan 16 2003, 17:23 Gabriel Noise shaping is the same between 3.90.2, 3.91, 3.... Jan 16 2003, 17:37 LordofStars 'tis only 3.93 that comes unreccomended. Jan 16 2003, 18:19
dev0 We've been through this so many times...
The d... Jan 16 2003, 18:24 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 17:03 |
