Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92, Audible differences with APS? |
Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92, Audible differences with APS? |
  Jan 16 2003, 16:03
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 524 Joined: 7-November 02 From: Gloucester, UK Member No.: 3716  |
oops, I always thought I had been using 3.90.2, but upon actually opening my eyes and checking, it seems I am using 3.92. I have swapped to 3.90.2, although I cannot tell one little difference whatsoever.
Is there any difference, audibly? -------------------- http://www.megalev.co.uk
|
 |
 
|
 |
|
Jan 16 2003, 17:02
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 723 Joined: 29-November 01 Member No.: 563 |
Apparently the developpers have screwed something up; 3.92 and later I believe use the wrong noiseshaping with APS.
I personally would recommend 3.90.2 for the VBR presets, and 3.93.1 for the ABR & CBR presets. |
|
|
|
Lev Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92 Jan 16 2003, 16:03
RIV@NVX 3.92 is newer, 3.90.2 is older... I don't know... Jan 16 2003, 16:10 dev0 There should be no audible difference, but maybe a... Jan 16 2003, 16:26 Gabriel QUOTE Apparently the developpers have screwed some... Jan 16 2003, 17:07 Lev What does the '???' mean?
Wrong noise sha... Jan 16 2003, 17:22 Daffy QUOTE (NeoRenegade @ Jan 16 2003 - 11:02 AM)A... Jan 16 2003, 17:23 Gabriel Noise shaping is the same between 3.90.2, 3.91, 3.... Jan 16 2003, 17:37 LordofStars 'tis only 3.93 that comes unreccomended. Jan 16 2003, 18:19
dev0 We've been through this so many times...
The d... Jan 16 2003, 18:24 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 14:20 |
