foobar2000 0.9.5 and Windows 2000? |
foobar2000 Tech Support Forum RulesPlease read foobar2000 Tech Support Forum Rules before posting and comply with all the points.
Failure to provide all the information pointed out in the above document in your post is considered wasting other people's time and in extreme cases will lead to your topic getting locked without a reply.
See also: Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service.
foobar2000 0.9.5 and Windows 2000? |
 Oct 20 2007, 19:42
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 22-January 04 Member No.: 11445  |
Could someone give me a technical explaination as to why Windows 2000 is no longer supported? Maybe this great app should be renamed to FoobarXP
 (What is going to happen to us win2k users now? I presume there won't be two branches maintained, one that will work on win2k and one more 'fancy pants' one. Are we left by the roadside?) |
 |
 
|
 |
|
Oct 25 2007, 10:48
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 43 Joined: 12-May 04 Member No.: 14052 |
Let us hope for a charitative soul (or an interested one too
 ) to port 9.5 to win2k in case the main developers no longer care about supporting it.I understand the challenge that implies having to support an increasing number of platforms made by people (or an evil corporation ) that don't care much about keeping things compatible or backporting certain capabilities. But, I must ask. Is it really necessary to ditch support for a "fine" (comparatively) and perfectly valid platform like windows 2000 to add whatever new features the new foobar has?When talking about microsoft's OS's there are many bad things to expect when upgrading to a new "version". Personally I have become pretty confident in my dominion over this particular version (2000 pro), and find myself able to FIGHT it's attempts to fuck my system, and also it's weaknesses againts the outside world. If I should switch to XP or whatever, this will surely change and possibly cause some havoc. This idea is not very pleasing considering what I have now and that I really don't feel like I need any of XP's innovations... if it weren't for so many programs' new versions that now are ditching "old" w2k in favor of newer OS's, like foobar2000, which I absolutelly love! I'm grateful for everything I got FOR FREE so far, but, again, żis this change absolutely necessary? This post has been edited by radorn: Oct 25 2007, 11:31 |
|
|
|
Cryton foobar2000 0.9.5 and Windows 2000? Oct 20 2007, 19:42
Squeller foobar2000 0.95 and Windows 2000 - What kind of pr... Oct 20 2007, 21:06 David Nordin QUOTE (Cryton @ Oct 20 2007, 20:42) (What... Oct 21 2007, 08:39 Melchior First of I love this program, I have been able to ... Oct 22 2007, 02:07 radorn It won't run on win2k anymore? so cruel
I g... Oct 22 2007, 12:13 Corelian I would also like to know the reason(s) for droppi... Oct 23 2007, 12:10
Egor QUOTE (Corelian @ Oct 23 2007, 18:10) I w... Oct 23 2007, 12:40 Corelian QUOTE (Egor @ Oct 23 2007, 13:40) Limited... Oct 23 2007, 17:21 molnart I'm rather interested what do i need to instal... Oct 24 2007, 07:07 Egor QUOTE (molnart @ Oct 24 2007, 13:07) I... Oct 24 2007, 07:43 reil one possible reason i'm guessing is that fooba... Oct 24 2007, 07:33 vasya_pupkin I have a question... Will I be able to make future... Oct 25 2007, 07:25 Jipcy QUOTE (vasya_pupkin @ Oct 25 2007, 02:25)... Oct 26 2007, 14:43 shakey_snake A Win2k version is probably as likely as Linux and... Oct 25 2007, 21:18 Early QUOTE (shakey_snake @ Oct 25 2007, 14:18)... Oct 26 2007, 01:44 Slotos QUOTE (Early @ Oct 26 2007, 03:44) I migh... Oct 26 2007, 04:05 Egor QUOTE (shakey_snake @ Oct 26 2007, 03:18)... Oct 26 2007, 04:48 shakey_snake QUOTE (Egor @ Oct 25 2007, 23:48) QUOTE (... Oct 26 2007, 20:36 Egor QUOTE (shakey_snake @ Oct 27 2007, 02:36)... Oct 26 2007, 20:54 Lyx When an application drops OS support, then it typi... Oct 25 2007, 21:40 Squeller QUOTE (Lyx @ Oct 25 2007, 22:40) When an ... Oct 26 2007, 18:39 molnart QUOTE (Lyx @ Oct 25 2007, 22:40) Last tim... Oct 26 2007, 19:37 Slotos QUOTE (molnart @ Oct 26 2007, 21:37) 1) I... Oct 26 2007, 20:37 shakey_snake QUOTE It is easy to say this if you can afford a n... Oct 25 2007, 22:37 thuan Experiences and preferences with OSs differs from ... Oct 26 2007, 07:28 chaosblade I've seen quite a few applications that do not... Oct 26 2007, 19:50 shakey_snake ...who should upgrade.
Please don't partial... Oct 26 2007, 21:06 Canar QUOTE (shakey_snake @ Oct 26 2007, 13:06)... Oct 26 2007, 21:15 Mike Giacomelli QUOTE (Canar @ Oct 26 2007, 13:15) QUOTE ... Oct 27 2007, 00:06 Lyx If someone really wants a justification for someth... Oct 26 2007, 21:16 bubbleguuum The funny thing is that fb 0.95 worls under Linux ... Oct 26 2007, 21:49 chaosblade Wine 'emulates' the needed parts in XP, Pr... Oct 26 2007, 22:05 bubbleguuum QUOTE (chaosblade @ Oct 26 2007, 23:05) W... Oct 26 2007, 22:22 Zao QUOTE (bubbleguuum @ Oct 26 2007, 23:22) ... Oct 26 2007, 22:31 Slotos QUOTE (bubbleguuum @ Oct 27 2007, 00:22) ... Oct 27 2007, 02:48 TrNSZ QUOTE (Slotos @ Oct 26 2007, 21:48) QUOTE... Oct 27 2007, 03:37 Egor QUOTE (Mike Giacomelli @ Oct 27 2007, 06... Oct 27 2007, 09:54 user I think not mentioned yet:
Though I can generally... Oct 27 2007, 10:30 Slotos QUOTE (Egor @ Oct 27 2007, 11:54) I belie... Oct 27 2007, 15:51 Zao QUOTE (shakey_snake @ Oct 26 2007, 22:06)... Oct 26 2007, 22:20 FrozenSpoon The actual dependencies on XP-only features seems ... Oct 27 2007, 01:05 chaosblade No one should encourage people to use outdated sof... Oct 27 2007, 11:19 aliendesaster Don't touch a running system. Even if microsof... Oct 27 2007, 11:46 joen The comparison with older versions of Windows like... Oct 27 2007, 12:26 chaosblade Comparing the code base of Windows 2000, XP and Vi... Oct 27 2007, 13:09 DocBeard I don't use Windows 2000 (in fact, I don't... Oct 27 2007, 15:01 Peter Windows 2000 support is gone because maintaining i... Oct 27 2007, 20:09 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 22:52 |
