foobar2000 0.9.5 and Windows 2000? |
Please read foobar2000 Tech Support Forum Rules before posting and comply with all the points.
Failure to provide all the information pointed out in the above document in your post is considered wasting other people's time and in extreme cases will lead to your topic getting locked without a reply.
See also: Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service.
foobar2000 0.9.5 and Windows 2000? |
Oct 20 2007, 19:42
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 22-January 04 Member No.: 11445 |
Could someone give me a technical explaination as to why Windows 2000 is no longer supported? Maybe this great app should be renamed to FoobarXP
(What is going to happen to us win2k users now? I presume there won't be two branches maintained, one that will work on win2k and one more 'fancy pants' one. Are we left by the roadside?) |
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 26 2007, 22:05
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 462 Joined: 30-March 04 From: Israel Member No.: 13133 |
Wine 'emulates' the needed parts in XP, Probably.
|
|
|
|
Oct 26 2007, 22:22
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Developer Posts: 1074 Joined: 13-November 05 Member No.: 25748 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2007, 02:48
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 272 Joined: 26-November 04 From: Kiev Member No.: 18348 |
More probably it merely tells fb2k: "hey I'm XP", to make it happy! It just provides all the API calls needed. Actually one can try replacing win2k dlls with xp ones according to the foobar2000 errors. Inuse tool might be helpful. This post has been edited by Slotos: Oct 27 2007, 02:48 -------------------- Sharing delusions since 1991.
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2007, 03:37
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Developer Posts: 717 Joined: 25-September 01 From: ... The Studio Member No.: 20 |
More probably it merely tells fb2k: "hey I'm XP", to make it happy! It just provides all the API calls needed.Actually one can try replacing win2k dlls with xp ones according to the foobar2000 errors. Inuse tool might be helpful. And this defeats the whole purpose anyway, does it not, replacing the components of your Windows 2000 installation with Windows XP components? Microsoft invented a pretty decent solution for this. It's called Setup on the Windows XP media and it works pretty well for such an upgrade. It was actually officially released six years ago today! (And configured here uses less RAM than Windows 2000 did on the same hardware and runs faster). XP Requires: Pentium 233Mhz, 800x600 SuperVGA, 64MB of RAM, 1.8GB hard disk space. 2K Requires: Pentium 133Mhz, 640x480 VGA, 64MB of RAM, 2.0GB hard disk space. If anyone is really stuck on Windows 2000 due to true hardware constraints, give me your e-mail address registered with Paypal and I'll consider donating the cash you need to bring your system up to 64MB of RAM and a VGA card that can do 800x600. I probably spend more money each week in fast food, and this will help my diet. |
|
|
|
Cryton foobar2000 0.9.5 and Windows 2000? Oct 20 2007, 19:42
Squeller foobar2000 0.95 and Windows 2000 - What kind of pr... Oct 20 2007, 21:06
David Nordin QUOTE (Cryton @ Oct 20 2007, 20:42) (What... Oct 21 2007, 08:39
Melchior First of I love this program, I have been able to ... Oct 22 2007, 02:07
radorn It won't run on win2k anymore? so cruel
I g... Oct 22 2007, 12:13
Corelian I would also like to know the reason(s) for droppi... Oct 23 2007, 12:10
Egor QUOTE (Corelian @ Oct 23 2007, 18:10) I w... Oct 23 2007, 12:40
Corelian QUOTE (Egor @ Oct 23 2007, 13:40) Limited... Oct 23 2007, 17:21
molnart I'm rather interested what do i need to instal... Oct 24 2007, 07:07
Egor QUOTE (molnart @ Oct 24 2007, 13:07) I... Oct 24 2007, 07:43
reil one possible reason i'm guessing is that fooba... Oct 24 2007, 07:33
vasya_pupkin I have a question... Will I be able to make future... Oct 25 2007, 07:25
Jipcy QUOTE (vasya_pupkin @ Oct 25 2007, 02:25)... Oct 26 2007, 14:43
radorn Let us hope for a charitative soul (or an interest... Oct 25 2007, 10:48
shakey_snake A Win2k version is probably as likely as Linux and... Oct 25 2007, 21:18
Early QUOTE (shakey_snake @ Oct 25 2007, 14:18)... Oct 26 2007, 01:44

Slotos QUOTE (Early @ Oct 26 2007, 03:44) I migh... Oct 26 2007, 04:05
Egor QUOTE (shakey_snake @ Oct 26 2007, 03:18)... Oct 26 2007, 04:48
shakey_snake QUOTE (Egor @ Oct 25 2007, 23:48) QUOTE (... Oct 26 2007, 20:36
Egor QUOTE (shakey_snake @ Oct 27 2007, 02:36)... Oct 26 2007, 20:54
Lyx When an application drops OS support, then it typi... Oct 25 2007, 21:40
Squeller QUOTE (Lyx @ Oct 25 2007, 22:40) When an ... Oct 26 2007, 18:39
molnart QUOTE (Lyx @ Oct 25 2007, 22:40) Last tim... Oct 26 2007, 19:37
Slotos QUOTE (molnart @ Oct 26 2007, 21:37) 1) I... Oct 26 2007, 20:37
shakey_snake QUOTE It is easy to say this if you can afford a n... Oct 25 2007, 22:37
thuan Experiences and preferences with OSs differs from ... Oct 26 2007, 07:28
chaosblade I've seen quite a few applications that do not... Oct 26 2007, 19:50
shakey_snake ...who should upgrade.
Please don't partial... Oct 26 2007, 21:06
Canar QUOTE (shakey_snake @ Oct 26 2007, 13:06)... Oct 26 2007, 21:15
Mike Giacomelli QUOTE (Canar @ Oct 26 2007, 13:15) QUOTE ... Oct 27 2007, 00:06
Lyx If someone really wants a justification for someth... Oct 26 2007, 21:16
bubbleguuum The funny thing is that fb 0.95 worls under Linux ... Oct 26 2007, 21:49
Zao QUOTE (bubbleguuum @ Oct 26 2007, 23:22) ... Oct 26 2007, 22:31
Egor QUOTE (Mike Giacomelli @ Oct 27 2007, 06... Oct 27 2007, 09:54
user I think not mentioned yet:
Though I can generally... Oct 27 2007, 10:30
Slotos QUOTE (Egor @ Oct 27 2007, 11:54) I belie... Oct 27 2007, 15:51
Zao QUOTE (shakey_snake @ Oct 26 2007, 22:06)... Oct 26 2007, 22:20
FrozenSpoon The actual dependencies on XP-only features seems ... Oct 27 2007, 01:05
chaosblade No one should encourage people to use outdated sof... Oct 27 2007, 11:19
aliendesaster Don't touch a running system. Even if microsof... Oct 27 2007, 11:46
joen The comparison with older versions of Windows like... Oct 27 2007, 12:26
chaosblade Comparing the code base of Windows 2000, XP and Vi... Oct 27 2007, 13:09
DocBeard I don't use Windows 2000 (in fact, I don't... Oct 27 2007, 15:01
Peter Windows 2000 support is gone because maintaining i... Oct 27 2007, 20:09![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 17:39 |