Nero AAC - Lower fractional quality values not really lower, e.g., q 0.2185955271124839644 > q 0.22 |
Nero AAC - Lower fractional quality values not really lower, e.g., q 0.2185955271124839644 > q 0.22 |
Oct 30 2007, 21:42
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 8-October 07 Member No.: 47674 |
I have found that some actually lower quality values produce higher bitrates in Nero Digital Audio Reference MPEG-4 & 3GPP Audio Encoder (Version: 1.1.34.2, Build date: Aug 6 2007)
I was just trying to get the lowest possible quality while not introducing any crosstalk between the channels in a test sample, when I found that the bitrates where not decreasing. The -help switch says that the value of -q "is a floating-point number in 0...1 range". 0.2185955271124839644 is a floating-point number, it's lower than 0.22, and it's producing bigger files in all cases I tested. So... there's something bad there May I be doing something wrong? Or is this a problem in the encoder? Thanks for the attention, I hope it can be fixed. And sorry for my poor English! EDIT: BTW, "target quality" mode is the highest quality/smallest file mode available, isn't it? Or may two-pass target bitrate mode be better in some cases? This post has been edited by Unown: Oct 30 2007, 21:48 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 31 2007, 07:33
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Nero MPEG4 developer Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 1218 Joined: 11-October 01 From: LA Member No.: 267 |
For different expected bitrate ranges the encoder uses different parameters that produce different results. On the switch between parameter sets there might be "glitches" in the bitrate. I already explained before that in the last version we brought the gaps between the sets together much closer, apparently in some cases even too close... The old encoder made jumps of ~10kbps between sets, that was also not good (although for some reason less people complained
|
|
|
|
Unown Nero AAC - Lower fractional quality values not really lower Oct 30 2007, 21:42
pdq Isn't it possible that the larger file is of l... Oct 30 2007, 21:46
Unown QUOTE (pdq @ Oct 30 2007, 17:46) Isn... Oct 30 2007, 21:54
Mike Giacomelli QUOTE (Unown @ Oct 30 2007, 13:54) QUOTE ... Oct 31 2007, 00:20
kornchild2002 Just curious but why would someone use -q 0.218595... Oct 31 2007, 01:19
Unown So... there are quality values that produce bigger... Oct 31 2007, 01:34
Mike Giacomelli QUOTE (Unown @ Oct 30 2007, 17:34) So... ... Oct 31 2007, 05:11
Unown QUOTE (Mike Giacomelli @ Oct 31 2007, 01... Oct 31 2007, 05:23
pdq Why would you need any kind of stereo for your cel... Oct 31 2007, 02:14
Unown QUOTE (pdq @ Oct 30 2007, 22:14) Why woul... Oct 31 2007, 02:37
Unown Thanks for the info. I understand now.
In that ca... Oct 31 2007, 21:00
menno Yes for finding these mapping tables 2 decimals ar... Oct 31 2007, 21:14
Unown Thanks a lot! Oct 31 2007, 21:17![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 19:05 |